Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

  • Moderation Lead
Posted

Whatever anyone’s feelings towards Leeds, nobody can deny they deserved the win last night and they’re where they are on merit. 

The city centre is great, I may be biased as I went to uni there, but I’ve always been a fan!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, K-Hod said:

Whatever anyone’s feelings towards Leeds, nobody can deny they deserved the win last night and they’re where they are on merit. 

The city centre is great, I may be biased as I went to uni there, but I’ve always been a fan!

They beat a poor weak Derby side but did have a good goal wrongly disallowed and at least 1, maybe 2, decent penalty shouts turned down.

Leeds by far the better team throughout the game.

Scott Carson played well for Leeds and had an assist in both goals ...... oh hang on a minute ........

Derby's best effort was the penalty they should have been awarded when the Leeds keeper deliberately put his foot/studs into a Derby face and was not even spoken to.

Edited by AllRoverAsia
  • Backroom
Posted

81 minutes, Norwich trail 1-0 and bring Rhodes on

83 minutes, Rhodes scores

May not do much else but he’s brilliant at what he does!

  • Like 1
Posted

Not looking good for the NW teams at the moment. Wigan PNE Bolton and Rovers all in the bottom half. Hope they all stay up and Burnley go down. Some good derbies next season. 

Blackpool not a million miles off the POs despite the ongoing fiasco.

Bolton will probably go mind. Not a pot to piss in.

Posted

6 points off the play offs after the run of games we’ve just had - as if the Xmas period isn’t tough enough says to me that we still might be knocking on the door at the tail end of the season.

  • Like 2
Posted

Rovers now have played both games against three of the top four which means on the teams around us have somewhat tougher games to come on paper.

Three clubs have zoomed up the table with runs of five or more wins- QPR, Brum and now Hull who are the third of our three home games coming up on the trot.

Hopefully, we can get a run of successive wins going ourselves now. Very often runs get going after grinding out the sort of win we have got at Millwall this evening. 

  • Like 3
Posted
7 hours ago, blueboy3333 said:

I'd say our squad is worth a lot more than £23million surely. Dack around £18milllion, Mulgrew at £3million, Nyambe £3/4million, Raya similar, Lenihan similar again. Then you have young players like Armstrong and Travis who are worth a few bob and then the rest of the squad. I'd say a figure of £35million would be more accurate.

Posted
2 hours ago, robbojohnno said:

I'd say our squad is worth a lot more than £23million surely. Dack around £18milllion, Mulgrew at £3million, Nyambe £3/4million, Raya similar, Lenihan similar again. Then you have young players like Armstrong and Travis who are worth a few bob and then the rest of the squad. I'd say a figure of £35million would be more accurate.

Dack £18m :unsure:

Posted
13 minutes ago, philipl said:

It was Mulgrew £3m that ?for me.

Get Dack properly fit and he is easily worth that.

I would have Dack around £10m. Similar to what we payed for Pat Bamford. Dack showed quality in League 1 but what I have seen this season has dropped off a bit.

Posted (edited)

We rejected £15million from West Brom in August and his profile and goal tally has only increased since then. He’s scored as many goals as this time last season - but at a higher level, so hasn’t ‘dropped off’ at all.

So of course £18million+ is reasonable in this daft market.

Edited by Mattyblue
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Mattyblue said:

We rejected £15million from West Brom in August and his profile and goal tally has only increased since then. He’s scored as many goals as this time last season - but at a higher level, so hasn’t ‘dropped off’ at all.

So of course £18million+ is reasonable in this daft market.

Looks like a bit of good negotiating going on on both sides there. Potential buyer and potential seller. :D 

Personally I wouldn’t part with a future England play-maker for anything lesss than £20m in today’s market. ;) 

Edited by Stuart
Posted
29 minutes ago, CP Company Lad said:

I would have Dack around £10m. Similar to what we payed for Pat Bamford. Dack showed quality in League 1 but what I have seen this season has dropped off a bit.

He played in a better team last season relative to the opposition. This season the responsibility on his shoulders is huge. Yet Dack is still the top scoring AM in the league. He's got more than highly-lauded Harry Wilson and Harvey Barnes. As a goalscoring AM he is a bit special, as this seasons goal return has showed. 

It's needs putting in context too. He is the top scoring AM in the league in a team that creates very few chances from open play. 

He's kicked on this year, not dropped off. 

  • Like 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, K-Hod said:

In his first ever season in this division, no less!

Where he is man-marked nearly every game because we don't really have anyone else worth marking in the attacking MF areas!

Teams don't tend to man-mark shite. 

  • Backroom
Posted

Dack had an excellent start to the season. His form only started to drop off when Mowbray started playing him as a CF, for reasons only the manager can explain. After that, even back in his preferred role, his performances waned a bit - but in fairness the whole team was struggling throughout December, so it wasn't just Dack. 

Mowbray subbing him off the past few games is interesting, as it wasn't happening before. Is it fitness, attitude or just that Dack doesn't fit into the shape Mowbray wants to play towards the end of our past few matches? 

Posted
Just now, DE. said:

Dack had an excellent start to the season. His form only started to drop off when Mowbray started playing him as a CF, for reasons only the manager can explain. After that, even back in his preferred role, his performances waned a bit - but in fairness the whole team was struggling throughout December, so it wasn't just Dack. 

Mowbray subbing him off the past few games is interesting, as it wasn't happening before. Is it fitness, attitude or just that Dack doesn't fit into the shape Mowbray wants to play towards the end of our past few matches? 

I think it’s gone a long way to shoring us up in the last few minutes, we went 4-4-2 vs WBA and brought on a pacy outlet we needed yesterday.

Risk/Reward with keeping the magician on when it’s not working or the ball is just being pumped into our box and we’re being pushed back.

Fantastic game management from TM.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.