Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

JANUARY TRANSFER WINDOW

adz4d2

By adz4d2
in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard

 Share

Recommended Posts

bluebruce World Cup

bluebruce

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Madon said:

70% completed. 

 

I can't believe it myself though.  I'd be astounded if it happened

70%? What does that mean in real terms? Sounds kinda like fee more or less agreed but personal terms not discussed yet?

Any idea whether this is permanent or loan to a view (presumably with a big loan fee)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Silas
Silas

Meanwhile, on another clubs messageboard: "But Blackburn got BD for 750k, Rodwell on a free, Armstrong for about a million, and DG for a reasonable price. And they're now 8th in the league.

K-Hod
K-Hod

Whilst I definitely acknowledge that he will need replacing sooner rather than later, I am honestly starting to think that even if Graham saved you from drowning, you'd complain that he didn't manage

philipl
philipl

There are too many people in Blackburn who are only happy when they are moaning or angry. Mowbray is doing a very decent job at Rovers. He has turned the club around in all the ways traditio

Posted Images

bluebruce World Cup

bluebruce

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, alderson777 said:

I'm 98% BA won't be joining Rovers. Would be fantastic but very very doubtful, the lad is earning £40,000+ at Boro

Conspiracy theory here, but I could see someone higher up thinking it's a good idea to have a bid accepted knowing we won't be able to agree personal terms. Then you turn around and say we tried but the player wanted too much for our wage structure. But at least we look ambitious to the fans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Backroom
Madon Uefa Europa League

Madon

Posted
  • Backroom
Posted

Sorry, i have no idea just got told that it's 70% done and Waggott is going over to Newcastle tomorrow for a meeting about it. 

Therefore, if anyone sees Waggott at Ewood tomorrow then I may be wrong!

Fee agreed? Not a clue. Loan? Not a clue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBlue

SBlue

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Madon said:

Sorry, i have no idea just got told that it's 70% done and Waggott is going over to Newcastle tomorrow for a meeting about it. 

Therefore, if anyone sees Waggott at Ewood tomorrow then I may be wrong!

Fee agreed? Not a clue. Loan? Not a clue. 

I hope he booked his train ticket in advance as prices go up on the day... he wouldn’t like that.

 

BRING IT HOME STEVO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JeffRover Premier League

JeffRover

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Madon said:

Sorry, i have no idea just got told that it's 70% done and Waggott is going over to Newcastle tomorrow for a meeting about it. 

Therefore, if anyone sees Waggott at Ewood tomorrow then I may be wrong!

Fee agreed? Not a clue. Loan? Not a clue. 

That implies meeting an agent to me or somebody from Middlesbrough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Backroom
Tom World Cup

Tom

Posted
  • Backroom
Posted
1 minute ago, S8 & Blue said:

I hope he booked his train ticket in advance as prices go up on the day... he wouldn’t like that.

 

BRING IT HOME STEVO

I genuinely bumped into him once on a return from Euston, standard class on the first off peak one, watch the pennies and all that!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
markhayhurst Premier League

markhayhurst

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Madon said:

70% completed. 

 

I can't believe it myself though.  I'd be astounded if it happened

Tony is going to go mental at all these potential leaks. 70% complete and in the public domain before across the line....etc.  He wasn’t too impressed last time he thought someone was leaking information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
USABlue World Cup

USABlue

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, blueboy3333 said:

Mogga was on the radio talking about AA yesterday. Said eventually that he will start up front (which is where AA wants to play) but that for now he'll continue to play out wide. What's been good recently is that we are actually putting the ball in between the full back and CH for him to run on to and not just giving him the ball out wide. It's frustrating to watch him making those runs and him never getting the ball. It must be immensely annoying for him. Again though it comes down to Travis' emergence. We seem to be a bit higher up the pitch and able to play through the 'thirds' at the moment. It's easier to play someone in on the deck from 20 yards than it is from 50. It's amazing the difference Travis has made really. I was all for the Smallwood and Evans combo continuing too?

Hard to pick out the run when our previous midfield only passed sideways or backwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bluebruce World Cup

bluebruce

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Madon said:

Sorry, i have no idea just got told that it's 70% done and Waggott is going over to Newcastle tomorrow for a meeting about it. 

Therefore, if anyone sees Waggott at Ewood tomorrow then I may be wrong!

Fee agreed? Not a clue. Loan? Not a clue. 

Cheers. Have you heard that it would be both him and Gally, or are you speculating on that part?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chaddyrovers

chaddyrovers

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, bluebruce said:

Doesn't necessarily mean anything. Do you have thoughts on this as a transfer if it does happen?

I would be very surprise if we signed him. Not sure this fit the signings we have been making over the last 18 months. 

Where has Gallagher does..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
roversfan99 World Cup

roversfan99

Posted
Posted
Just now, chaddyrovers said:

He has played wide under Pulis due to he wont play 2 up front. 

Don't want either him or Gallagher to be used wide. Would prefer an actual wide man wide. 

Neither of the 2 would dislodge Dack and Graham, nor would they be effective wide. Assombolonga a far better player though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tomphil World Cup

tomphil

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, bluebruce said:

Conspiracy theory here, but I could see someone higher up thinking it's a good idea to have a bid accepted knowing we won't be able to agree personal terms. Then you turn around and say we tried but the player wanted too much for our wage structure. But at least we look ambitious to the fans...

I'm sure that's  happened in the past after all an enquiry is just an enquiry until real numbers are placed on the table.

P.S Don't worry about the 'opposites' .. ??

Edited by tomphil
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.