JacknOry Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, nathan_rovers1 said: I mean, could it be the possibility that Mowbray is working on the centre defenders and the such like and nothing appropriate has come up? Fairly happy with Gally, think he will deliver massively in a better team than he had previously. I have faith in the big man! Thats the hope but this has been the hope for about 300 windows now for me. 1
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
bluebruce Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 55 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said: Ya, could work out expensive. Say a 4 year contract, plus the fee and you are into double figures in the millions. I just wonder is the flex open ended or will it impact us this window. I reckon the rest of the business will be a keeper on a free and a CB on loan. That simply wouldn't be an acceptable allocation of resources. I'm amazed you seem to think it would be. Not sure what you mean by open ended here? But yes, spending upwards of 10 million on a player between fee and wages would impact other areas this window.
Guest Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 If we’re to play 5 at the back, we need to sign 3 CB’s, no question about it. Mulgrew ain’t up to it and Williams should be sold. If you’re operating 3 CB’s you need at least 5 in the squad you feel can play there, we have 1. I’d be a lot less surprised to see us operate a 433 next season with Dack as one of the 3 as he mentioned England play it around April time if I remember? Just after we played Villa?
FGS5635 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, JacknOry said: Even so, we can barely field two quality CBs and are from having the depth to have three back there Depends what your take is on 3 at the back. The clubs that are succesful with it tend to play full backs at the outer 2 and a proper centre half in the middle. So we'd be more Williams, Lenihan, Nyambe kinda setup. If not saying thats a good 3, just it explains his lack of signings at centre half. Explains why he seems to prefer wing back type full backs etc
Guest Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 And just to clarify, fairly happy with Gallagher, rate him a lot. He only needs to hit 15 goals once and in today’s market you’re definitely recouping the transfer fee we’re said to have agreed with Southampton for him. Just think it could, and should, be better spent.
Bigdoggsteel Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, JHRover said: Armstrong for 1.5, Brereton for 7 and Gallagher for 5. All strikers by trade yet none will be playing there. Meanwhile in February we had no fit CBs and had to throw Magloire in. Makes no footballing sense and I refuse to accept Mowbray is entirely responsible for this. Its Venky policy. I wonder Here are Mowbrays west Brom signings https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/west-brom-albion-tony-mowbray-12793111.amp Only two defenders by my count. I only just scanned the names. Hoefkens and Ollsson. Two decent centre halves in fairness, but the vast majority of his signings were midfielders... God I would just love to see us splash some cash on a defender or goalkeeper. Even psychologically it would give the team a boost. If we don't strengthen and we continue conceding goals like last season, I'd say the players will even be pissed with the situation. 3
Miller11 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Never mind the fees we payed for Armstrong, Brereton and probably now Gallagher too... Dominic Samuel cost more than our entire defence. Denying there is something beyond Mowbray’s control going on is burying your head in the sand. Venkys won’t spend on defenders.
Oldgregg86 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 24 minutes ago, davulsukur said: ----------------Nyambe--Lenihan--Williams Bennett----------------------------------------------Bell **Shudder** You missed leutwiler
Bigdoggsteel Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) Just now, bluebruce said: That simply wouldn't be an acceptable allocation of resources. I'm amazed you seem to think it would be. Not sure what you mean by open ended here? But yes, spending upwards of 10 million on a player between fee and wages would impact other areas this window. Where did I say that I think it would be acceptable? I just said what I think will happen By open ended I mean, if Gallagher signs a 4 year deal, will his future wages mean we have less to spend this summer or will it come out of future budgets. Obviously coming out of future budgets would be better. Edited July 12, 2019 by Bigdoggsteel
davulsukur Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Mellor Rover said: If we’re to play 5 at the back, we need to sign 3 CB’s, no question about it. Mulgrew ain’t up to it and Williams should be sold. If you’re operating 3 CB’s you need at least 5 in the squad you feel can play there, we have 1. I’d be a lot less surprised to see us operate a 433 next season with Dack as one of the 3 as he mentioned England play it around April time if I remember? Just after we played Villa? He's mentioned a change in formation and hes also mentioned Liverpool's set up in the past as well? 4-3-3 would make more sense than switching to a back 3, a formation we've struggled with at times when he's tried before.
HowieFive0 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Oldgregg86 said: You missed leutwiler Leutwiler wont be missed!!
EgyptianPete Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 37 minutes ago, Beanie01289 said: Doubt that very much as it means you don't get the best outta Dack I think it was a joke from the England film cant remember the title, but a funny film all the same. someone will enlighten us.
Bigdoggsteel Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) Just now, davulsukur said: He's mentioned a change in formation and hes also mentioned Liverpool's set up in the past as well? 4-3-3 would make more sense than switching to a back 3, a formation we've struggled with at times when he's tried before. 4-3-3 wouldn't be a huge change from last season. It would just mean the two either side of Dack would push up and Dack would drop a bit to join the two midfielders. Could work if Dack didn't drop too much and the two wingers start contributing more goals and assists. Spreading the goals and assists around is almost as important as sorting the defence imo. We can't rely so heavily on Dack and DG Edited July 12, 2019 by Bigdoggsteel
Backroom DE. Posted July 12, 2019 Backroom Posted July 12, 2019 I just can't see Mowbray playing without two midfielders in the centre. Two DM's has been a constant throughout his tenure, along with strikers on the wings. I'd be surprised to see either change at this point. 1
yeti-dog Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Mellor Rover said: If we’re to play 5 at the back, we need to sign 3 CB’s, no question about it. Mulgrew ain’t up to it and Williams should be sold. If you’re operating 3 CB’s you need at least 5 in the squad you feel can play there, we have 1. I’d be a lot less surprised to see us operate a 433 next season with Dack as one of the 3 as he mentioned England play it around April time if I remember? Just after we played Villa? I did wonder about this myself. I do like a 4-3-3 but only when it's played in the way Liverpool do.
JacknOry Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Bigdoggsteel said: I wonder Here are Mowbrays west Brom signings https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/west-brom-albion-tony-mowbray-12793111.amp Only two defenders by my count. I only just scanned the names. Hoefkens and Ollsson. Two decent centre halves in fairness, but the vast majority of his signings were midfielders... God I would just love to see us splash some cash on a defender or goalkeeper. Even psychologically it would give the team a boost. If we don't strengthen and we continue conceding goals like last season, I'd say the players will even be pissed with the situation. He doesnt do defence does he? His regret from his time at Coventry was that he didnt buy a CB too. Odd considering it was his position as a player. More odd is that we hardly set up to attack in order to score more than the oppo - we set up to defend. 2
EgyptianPete Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 13 minutes ago, Gavlar Somerset Rover! said: Very short sighted in today's market though; you only have to look at the profit the Bees have made on Konsa in one season. Full back prices are also astronomical these days too. It's like the V's are still stuck in the 90s. The "v"s aren't buying the players Mowbray is apparently
yeti-dog Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Miller11 said: Never mind the fees we payed for Armstrong, Brereton and probably now Gallagher too... Dominic Samuel cost more than our entire defence. Denying there is something beyond Mowbray’s control going on is burying your head in the sand. Venkys won’t spend on defenders. Says you - you can't state something as fact when it's actually just an opinion. Opinions are indeed like arseholes... 1
SBlue Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) GK RyNy Lenihan CH Bell Travis Dack Johnson Gally DG Rothwell Would like that 433 is just 4231 in all but name really Edited July 12, 2019 by S8 & Blue 2
4000Holes Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, S8 & Blue said: GK RyNy Lenihan CH Bell Travis Dack Johnson Gally DG Rothwell Would like that Full backs not good enough defensively. Would mean Lenihan and CH being pulled out of position to cover. would be great going forward though. 1
JacknOry Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, S8 & Blue said: GK RyNy Lenihan CH Bell Travis Dack Johnson Gally DG Rothwell Would like that 433 is just 4231 in all but name really Yup, Travis and Johnson would sit, Dack would assume his usual position and Gally and Rothwell are the wide forwards that we already use anyway. Same thing as what we';re doing anyway tbh.
Miller11 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, yeti-dog said: Says you - you can't state something as fact when it's actually just an opinion. Opinions are indeed like arseholes... You can draw conclusions when presented with evidence though. And there’s plenty of evidence to suggest my theory holds water.
ruggles1995 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 heres a shout, what about Peter Crouch on a Free ? I think he would be a alright squad player. Forget Age, experience, and squad role I think he would do a job
yeti-dog Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 No, I think if it's proper 4-3-3 then you have to have three genuine midfielders in there. For instance, Liverpool might have Keita, Fabinho and Henderson. All mobile, get up and down the pitch to support both the attack and the defence - they aren't just there to be defensive mids. I'd be okay with that as it rules out Evans and Smallwood and prefers the Travis type of midfielder. 1
Recommended Posts