Tony Mowbray Discussion

[had.e.nuff]

50 minutes ago, rigger said:

8000 allowed on Ewood from mid May. Pity our season will be over.

you mean its not over already?

[simongarnerisgod]

25 minutes ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said:

4 years at the helm for old Tony today.

The journey continues...

tony is taking us on the journey in a morris marina.i.e we`ve already broken down and the car is a write off,i suggest the driver is to blame and should be replaced by someone with a sierra cosworth!!!!!!!

[matt83]

1 hour ago, rigger said:

8000 allowed on Ewood from mid May. Pity our season will be over.

Doubt we’ll get near that. 

[Stuart]

1 hour ago, Mercer said:

Doubt we'll get half that number going.

They would do well to convince iFollow to keep showing games to keep a bit of cash coming in.

2,500 people and to avoid complaints they’ll have to make the walk-on price inappropriately high.

£25 to watch a dead rubber anyone?

Just imagine if Mowbray is still here at the start of next season!

[OldEwoodBlue]

It is 4000 not 8000.

 

• Performances and large events will be subject to limits though. For indoor events they can be at half capacity or 1,000 people, and outdoors they can be at half capacity or 4,000 people - whichever is lower. For large venues (at least 40,000 capacity) up to 10,000 will be allowed to attend.

 

There wont be any walk on option as it is amost certainly going to need proof of vaccination and testing.

Waggott won't be able to manage that on a match day if he already taxes walk ons due to unexpected pie demand.

 

4000 will be more than enough to cover demand anyway.

[rigger]

4 minutes ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

It is 4000 not 8000.

 

• Performances and large events will be subject to limits though. For indoor events they can be at half capacity or 1,000 people, and outdoors they can be at half capacity or 4,000 people - whichever is lower. For large venues (at least 40,000 capacity) up to 10,000 will be allowed to attend.

 

There wont be any walk on option as it is amost certainly going to need proof of vaccination and testing.

Waggott won't be able to manage that on a match day if he already taxes walk ons due to unexpected pie demand.

 

4000 will be more than enough to cover demand anyway.

0 will be more than enough as our last game will be a week before the rules take effect.

[Stuart]

9 minutes ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

It is 4000 not 8000.

 

• Performances and large events will be subject to limits though. For indoor events they can be at half capacity or 1,000 people, and outdoors they can be at half capacity or 4,000 people - whichever is lower. For large venues (at least 40,000 capacity) up to 10,000 will be allowed to attend.

 

There wont be any walk on option as it is amost certainly going to need proof of vaccination and testing.

Waggott won't be able to manage that on a match day if he already taxes walk ons due to unexpected pie demand.

 

4000 will be more than enough to cover demand anyway.

Why wouldn’t there be a walk on? Who has said proof of vaccination will be required?

[WacoRover]

Just listened to Roverschat on YouTube, “well done” & good discussion to all those involved. 

I must say, if Mowbray were to leave the team today, we are definitely in better shape than when he arrived. 

Now I can say, after listening to a very fair discussion, if Mowbray were to leave the team today, we might not feel so good about the immediate future:

1) lack of a name manager that is out there right now, that we could get;

2) money (it’s always money, isn’t it!?)

If we get body slammed by Watford, I’d be willing to see him given his walking papers, but I would not be rejoicing at the prospects of the remainder of the season under an interim manager, or someone that would not instill anymore confidence than I have right now. 

[Richard Oakley]

6 minutes ago, WacoRover said:

Just listened to Roverschat on YouTube, “well done” & good discussion to all those involved. 

I must say, if Mowbray were to leave the team today, we are definitely in better shape than when he arrived. 

Now I can say, after listening to a very fair discussion, if Mowbray were to leave the team today, we might not feel so good about the immediate future:

1) lack of a name manager that is out there right now, that we could get;

2) money (it’s always money, isn’t it!?)

If we get body slammed by Watford, I’d be willing to see him given his walking papers, but I would not be rejoicing at the prospects of the remainder of the season under an interim manager, or someone that would not instill anymore confidence than I have right now. 

No we aren't in better shape -all the loanees we don't own and all the injuries.

There are managers out there who are much better and would, I believe, take the job.

[Gav]

5 minutes ago, Richard Oakley said:

No we aren't in better shape

We were heading to league 1, with an unfit, unmotivated load of crap in the squad.

Now we now a mid table championship side with probably over 35m in playing assets.

We are in far better shape than when Mowbray took over, we even have a European scout now!

 

 

[Richard Oakley]

1 minute ago, Gav said:

We were heading to league 1, with an unfit, unmotivated load of crap in the squad.

Now we now a mid table championship side with probably over 35m in playing assets.

We are in far better shape than when Mowbray took over, we even have a European scout now!

 

 

We're heading to league 1 with an unmotivated load players in the squad. Who says there are players worth £35m in assets?

Oh yes our european scout has been really instrumental ...

[WacoRover]

1 minute ago, Richard Oakley said:

We're heading to league 1 with an unmotivated load players in the squad. Who says there are players worth £35m in assets?

Oh yes our european scout has been really instrumental ...

I’d say Kaminski alone is worth it. 
Stergiakis... time will tell.

[tomphil]

We are very similar to when GB had been here a few years, it all went south pretty quickly. I think we all know though even if he'd stayed he was going backwards.

Next step now is vital but there won't be one, as you where.  All the off field stuff is about to be the major distraction away from the on field stalemate.  That'll probably run through next season as well.

[Richard Oakley]

1 minute ago, WacoRover said:

I’d say Kaminski alone is worth it. 
Stergiakis... time will tell.

Kaminski was on the radar before we had the european scout, wasn't he?

[Gav]

14 minutes ago, Richard Oakley said:

We're heading to league 1 with an unmotivated load players in the squad. Who says there are players worth £35m in assets?

Oh yes our european scout has been really instrumental ...

You're probably the only person on here who thinks we're going to be relegated, but of course you're entitled to your opinion, I'd put some money on it if I was you, it'll be big odds at the bookies.

As for assets - I think £35m is on the low side, but playing assets doesn't win you football matches sadly and eventually those 3 stooges in Pune will join the dots in the colouring book and sell them.

 

Edited February 22, 2021 by Gav

[Hoochie Bloochie Mama]

5 minutes ago, Richard Oakley said:

Kaminski was on the radar before we had the european scout, wasn't he?

Nobody had heard of him until he signed. 

[Richard Oakley]

3 minutes ago, Gav said:

You're probably the only person on here who thinks we're going to be relegated, but of course you're entitled to your opinion, I'd put some money on it if I you, it'll be big odds at the bookies.

As for assets - I think £35m is on the low side, but playing assets doesn't win you football matches sadly and eventually those 3 stooges in Pune will join the dots in the colouring book and sell them.

 

I said heading for relegation, not actually being relegated. There was time for Mowbray to save us on coming in for Coyle, but he failed. he won't stop us dropping like a stone this year.

No player assets don't win games. The players we do sell won't bring in £35m. I'd like to know whom you think would fetch that sum, 'cos I don't see it right now.

[OldEwoodBlue]

53 minutes ago, Stuart said:

Why wouldn’t there be a walk on? Who has said proof of vaccination will be required?

I imagine there will be more than 4000 wanting a ST.

Widely reported that proof of vaccination and testing are likely to be conditions of entry for concerts and sports events.

If testing is necessary before each game. 4000 x 15 min lateral flow tests is 1000 hours so wont be happening at the turnstile.

Waggott will love it. Not a single pie wasted.

[WacoRover]

32 minutes ago, Richard Oakley said:

Kaminski was on the radar before we had the european scout, wasn't he?

You’re probably right. 

[rigger]

1 hour ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

It is 4000 not 8000.

 

• Performances and large events will be subject to limits though. For indoor events they can be at half capacity or 1,000 people, and outdoors they can be at half capacity or 4,000 people - whichever is lower. For large venues (at least 40,000 capacity) up to 10,000 will be allowed to attend.

 

There wont be any walk on option as it is amost certainly going to need proof of vaccination and testing.

Waggott won't be able to manage that on a match day if he already taxes walk ons due to unexpected pie demand.

 

4000 will be more than enough to cover demand anyway.

I thought the statement said: Large outdoor venues, such as seated football stadiums, would be allowed 10,000 or 25% of capacity whichever is lowest. Anyway it is all irrelevant as it will probably all change by next season.   

[Richard Oakley]

17 minutes ago, WacoRover said:

You’re probably right. 

My question about Kaminski was a genuine one. I'm not claiming that the european scout didn't bring him in and he's been a good signing not that he's progressing under community center ben.

[Ulrich]

52 minutes ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

Waggott will love it. Not a single pie wasted.

You don't seriously think the catering staff can serve 4000 at half time?  Plenty of pies will be wasted due to slowness of service.

[Darrenbot]

4 hours ago, rigger said:

I thought the statement said: Large outdoor venues, such as seated football stadiums, would be allowed 10,000 or 25% of capacity whichever is lowest. Anyway it is all irrelevant as it will probably all change by next season.   

10000 is for stadiums with a capacity over 40000,for the rest of us its 4000 or 25% of capacity whichever is lower,doesnt matter really as our season is over before it comes into effect.Unless we miraculously make the playoffs.

Edited February 23, 2021 by Darrenbot

[Stuart]

8 hours ago, OldEwoodBlue said:

I imagine there will be more than 4000 wanting a ST.

Widely reported that proof of vaccination and testing are likely to be conditions of entry for concerts and sports events.

If testing is necessary before each game. 4000 x 15 min lateral flow tests is 1000 hours so wont be happening at the turnstile.

Waggott will love it. Not a single pie wasted.

I was talking about this season. Nobody is going to buy a 2020/21 ST in May.

[rigger]

3 hours ago, Darrenbot said:

10000 is for stadiums with a capacity over 40000,for the rest of us its 4000 or 25% of capacity whichever is lower,doesnt matter really as our season is over before it comes into effect.Unless we miraculously make the playoffs.

I cannot find any mention of 40,000 capacity. Just  mentions Hugh stadiums, but doesn't give a definition of what that is. It could effect us, in the fact that the rules may still apply next season. 

Edited February 23, 2021 by rigger