Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Tony Mowbray Discussion


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, darrenrover said:

Possibly but you'd guess that your head of recruitment would be involved in recruitment.

Brereton was only made available for transfer 2 or 3 days left of window If I remember correctly. Didnt we move for Luke Freeman before him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally think that was one of @chaddyrovers best posts. Until the last point about we don't know who we would have signed it was all based on reasons and well articulated. I disagree with a fair number of the points but appreciate reason, rational and facts as oppose to we don't know what would happen arguments. 

To suggest the loss of Dack hasn't had a huge effect is nonsense imo. Would it be enough to get us top 6? I'm not convinced as we weren't top 6 with him in the side. But given he is such a key player I'm confident we would likely be a bit closer/doing a bit better. I think the main thing for me from this is that it doesn't absolve TM as blame as there was no effort to replace a key player who was evidently out for a long time. To me that shows utter negligence, and whilst a like for like replacement would have been difficult, to not take any measures to counteract his loss is criminal. He could have thought ok we have lost Dack's goals so we need to conceed less and get a defender (or actual keeper in) or get a striker with a few more goals in them, buy or loan of budget is low - plenty of possible solutions to the absence of Dack. He is absolutely influential, not addressing his loss has been a big mistake. 

I think the arguments focusing in on the Millwall game is a bit of a red herring as there have been many occasions where the formation and the roles players have been playing have been real head scratchers. Personally the issue of playing favourites and the nadir of the lot dropping Nayambe for playing lots of football screams out that happiness of the squad is put before winning and is a sackable offence in and of itself. 

The European scouting network will take time to establish and I'm not sure when it was set up. If it was on our return to the championship it is unreasonable to expect any fruit from it last season, and an argument could be made for last summer depending on how long it took to establish (I have no idea on this!) 4 windows however does seem a tad alarming and there is a lot of pressure for it to work now. Whatever the length of time it takes to establish it cant be used as a positive for TM until it actually produces something! 

The loan situation and transfers in the summer in general is a huge problem because there is so much to do! We knew Mulgrew and Graham had limited shelf life in League 1 due to age and yet 2 years on neither have been replaced effectively. Admittedly not for want of trying but 12 million on we are no nearer to a replacement which is criminal. Factor in we need 3 key elements of our defence replacing  - an area of the team where consistency and continuity are even more crucial - and the age of Johnson and Downing. That's 7 players needing replacing before standing still. (The Mulgrew situation taught us something no matter how poor is better than notjing.) Even a slight less emphasis on loans would make this summer's task much easier. Given the age of the squad having so much emphasis on loans was a mistake. No issues with them being the missing pieces of the jigsaw, in fact they clearly are, but they shouldn't make up so much of the picture when half the pieces also need replacing due to age. 

There's also no doubt TM has made some great signings as listed by Chaddy BUT the issue is there's just as many clangers and they tend to be more costly. In the transfer review thread I gave him a 50:50 success rate on signings but when half of them are clangers that ultimately means half the squad are duds. And when the overall longevity of the squad is considered you can only wince at the problems we have. Yes we have some great players but it is totally undermined by the clangers we have in the team and unbalanced squad. Tosin is brilliant but it is undone by Walton's howlers. Armstrong is on fire but too many resources are lost in Ben and Gally who also won't contribute goals. One step forward, one step back. 

The biggest defence of TM is that he isn't a complete duffer as evidenced by promotion, some decent signings and our mid table finishes. In any other club that's no reason to keep a manager on whatsoever. However at the circus that is Rovers in the thrall of a substandard agency it is a very pressing and relevant factor. Their past record shows they couldn't appoint a good manager if they tried and are beholden to an agency so aren't really trying. Such circumstances make TM considerably more attractive as a proposition. Sadly though it doesn't make him a good manager. 

 

 

 

Edited by Blue blood
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Brereton was only made available for transfer 2 or 3 days left of window If I remember correctly. Didnt we move for Luke Freeman before him. 

If true that is strange.  Totally different players.  Points towards total chaos in Mowbray's management of the squad and what it requires.  We don't even need freeman, we need other areas sorting.  The guy has no idea and I cannot for the life of me understand your continued blind loyalty.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

 

1. We have improved in my opinion. Plus we have been without Dack for half a season and still reach the same points now with 2 games to go. Put Dack in this team we get top 6 In my opinion. If you took Grabban out of that Forest team they wouldn't be top 6 or WBA if they didn't have Pereira, or Fulham with Mitrovic.   Its enough for me. Might be different for other posters. 

2. The 1st half yesterday were awful. Too many long balls, no movement or quick tempo. Second half we were passing tempo wise and passing to feet. Rothwell had an impact. We moved to this boxed midfield with 2 strikers looking for space between their 3 man centre backs. Its didn't work. Am I concern? no

3. Its have taken time, hiring staff and money to bring this European Scouting Network that Mowbray wants. Its yourself who wants a replace Mowbray. So would you replacement want to use a European Scouting Network tho? That's a question for you. With the time and money Rovers have invested in bring this system into place surely this would be one of key questions you would asked of any managerial interview process? 

4. Loan signings are good thing at this level like WBA loan of Pereira or Leeds loan of Ben White. We aren't in a worst position then last summer but the same. Gallagher may come good next season or he may not. We have be over this Raya situation to death since last summer. Do we need to go over this again? 

5. I felt Mowbray should have used the money more better to sign players we need not just on one player. Jansson's agent was in talks with Brentford very quickly after he was told he  could leave Leeds. But we can suggest player names after names but we have no idea of the cost of the overall wages, fees involved and other factors. You mention no money? well we don't know what the owners will do. We will find out in the coming weeks. Mowbray has made a number of good signings over his tenure whether it Armstrong(1.8 million) and Dack(750k) or loan signings like Antonsson, Reed, Adarabioyo or free signings like Smallwood(Did a good job for us in league 1), Downing. Plus bringing through Lewis Travis to now becoming a key player for our club after watching him development from Under 18's football. With Buckley and Rankin Costello coming through and will be good players for this club next season and beyond. Davenport looks a good player from his appearances so far. Hopefully he develops into a good player for us in the future. 

6. Like I said in Point 1 if we had Dack I feel we would top 6 IMO. People will say Injuries happen but other teams had their key player out with Injury would have top 6 probably not. 

Sorry Chaddy, usually I defend you but I cannot agree with a single point and I'll go through why.

1. Yes we've been without Dack for half the season but we spent £12 million pound on attacking options. So the Dack excuse is completely void.

2. Neat passes? All of the passes were between Tosin and Lenihan? We looked like a team that were winning 1-0. The tempo was poor throughout and we did not look like scoring as all of the passes were along the back.

3. Mowbray says a lot of things. There is zero evidence that we are even looking at European players? We signed Holtby but he was training with us the whole summer before.

4. Well yes we are in a worse position. We had one of the best keepers in the league, and now we go into this summer with no keeper. 

5. Yes he's made good signings in Dack and Armstrong. Every other signing thats been permanent has been absolutely shambolic. Smallwood and Mulgrew getting extra tasty contract and then NEVER playing is sackable in itself.

6. Again we spent £12m on two big attacking options. I think if any other championship club spent this amount of money they'd be premier League class. But Mowbray isn't good enough to spend the big money, he's wasted it and now we have no money for the summer.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RoversClitheroe said:

. Mowbray says a lot of things. There is zero evidence that we are even looking at European players? 

So why have got Chief European Scout in Bruno Reis and from articles in local journalists saying we are scouting players in different countries. 

We have been linked to oversee players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

So why have got Chief European Scout in Bruno Reis and from articles in local journalists saying we are scouting players in different countries. 

We have been linked to oversee players

That's all you took away from my massive post?!

Edited by RoversClitheroe
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do wonder if Mowbray is being tactical with his comments in the press, again saying that our clueless owners still have given him no indication on the budget.

As if to put the blame slowly back onto them?

Doesnt feel like next season is one to be excited about, feels like groundhog day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

I do wonder if Mowbray is being tactical with his comments in the press, again saying that our clueless owners still have given him no indication on the budget.

As if to put the blame slowly back onto them?

Doesnt feel like next season is one to be excited about, feels like groundhog day.

Feels to me like he's already laying the ground for a season of absolute mediocrity at best!

Get those excuses in early!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TM doesn't need to do anything to put the blame back onto the owners.

If there's a fan out there that blames Mowbray for our delayed budgets / going into the summer unknown then as a collective we should tell them to take a look back at the last decade. This is a Venky problem, always has been and always will be. 

Mercer, give it a rest, not everything is the blokes fault. You are on overdrive lately. We've not had a budget on time since they came, it's hardly an excuse, it's the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TruRover said:

Anyone else hoping that the lack of communication with TM/ lack of trip to India is an indication that his future is being considered? 

No. 

More likely something to do with them being arseholes and the fact there's a small matter like a global pandemic going on

Edited by Dreams of 1995
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mowbray's comments almost identical to those of Paul Lambert in the early part of 2016. 

The owners are up to their old tricks. Manager and Ewood clueless as to what is going on and we are nothing but an inconvenient afterthought. Wish I could flush £20 million a year away on something so unimportant to me.

In another scenario I'd be expecting the manager to resign unless he got answers very quickly. There is no excuse for it. They are a disgrace and how anyone can express gratitude to them is beyond me.

I don't think Mowbray will resign. Partly because he isn't the quitter type but also because of the Covid.19 situation making it unchartered territory. He can probably soldier on without new signings, just give Samuel another year.

I do wonder how Waggott is going to wangle season tickets if he can't get answers from India. Just ignore it or go silent like he has the last 6 weeks?

Very concerning again. I wonder what Suhail is doing today?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

TM doesn't need to do anything to put the blame back onto the owners.

If there's a fan out there that blames Mowbray for our delayed budgets / going into the summer unknown then as a collective we should tell them to take a look back at the last decade. This is a Venky problem, always has been and always will be. 

Mercer, give it a rest, not everything is the blokes fault. You are on overdrive lately. We've not had a budget on time since they came, it's hardly an excuse, it's the truth. 

It's down to Waggott.

What is he - a man or a mouse?

Get them told we need a budget and in good time.  If he doesn't get it then he should walk, possibly with a case for constructive dismissal, as clearly he has not got the tools to do his job properly.

It aint rocket science.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mercer said:

It's down to Waggott.

What is he - a man or a mouse?

Get them told we need a budget and in good time.  If he doesn't get it then he should walk, possibly with a case for constructive dismissal, as clearly he has not got the tools to do his job properly.

It aint rocket science.

Every manager we ever have would just keep walking away if that is the case. I used to say it about Bowyer too but nothing will change whilst we are owned by them.

It's forever been the case. All this talk of walking for pride is no good to us as a club, however good it may look for the blokes doing it.

I agree wholeheartedly that it isn't a difficult request to make but we aren't dealing in normal here. What Mowbray has said isn't lining up excuses, it is the truth, and we've heard it from every manager except Bowyer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

Every manager we ever have would just keep walking away if that is the case. I used to say it about Bowyer too but nothing will change whilst we are owned by them.

It's forever been the case. All this talk of walking for pride is no good to us as a club, however good it may look for the blokes doing it.

I agree wholeheartedly that it isn't a difficult request to make but we aren't dealing in normal here. What Mowbray has said isn't lining up excuses, it is the truth, and we've heard it from every manager except Bowyer. 

The point I'm making, Waggott as CEO should be facing up Pune.

Let's say our Exec Directors and Mowbray all resigned, what do you think Pune would do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.