Tony Mowbray Discussion

[K-Hod]

9 hours ago, Tom said:

My worry is we will win 2-3 on the bounce at the end of the season and all will be forgotten.

‘he should be given the chance to build on it’ etc etc will ring around the Twittersphere

I’m the opposite, I’ve no concerns about us winning 2-3 games....

[Mattyblue]

28 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

I don't think anyone could seriously say that

Oh they can.

[K-Hod]

29 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

I don't think anyone could seriously say that, even if we won every remaining game. The run we went(are) on is just too bad. He has to go. 

You’d be surprised mate. ‘Where are all the Mowbray haters now?’ is just getting warmed up....

[gumboots]

For goodness sake, we DREW! Yes it's a better result than losing, but you'd be likely be relegated if you drew every match. I'm not a Mowbray hater, but I am firmly in the Mowbray out camp because he's outstayed his shelflife here. Most managers don't get half the time he's had, even if their results are better than Mowbray's.  

Edited April 11, 2021 by gumboots

[Bigdoggsteel]

1 hour ago, K-Hod said:

You’d be surprised mate. ‘Where are all the Mowbray haters now?’ is just getting warmed up....

It would be delusional though. Like you can't just forget the last 25 games

#neverforget 

 

[Athlete]

IMHO Mowbray needs to go and has done for a long time along with Waggot and Venus 

Unless Venkys get lucky with a agency recommended appointment we will be rinse and repeating same scenarios with debt to the owners rising yearly .

The cancer will never go whilst owned by Venkys

I would take a admin and come out the otherside anyday

[PeteJD13]

20 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

It would be delusional though. Like you can't just forget the last 25 games

#neverforget 

 

But they do though, some posters everyone’s to blame but Mowbray 

[PeteJD13]

We will beat derby and the narrative will shift to many scarred by Kean and Coyle

[Stuart]

11 hours ago, Tom said:

My worry is we will win 2-3 on the bounce at the end of the season and all will be forgotten.

‘he should be given the chance to build on it’ etc etc will ring around the Twittersphere

“Judge him after 10 games”.

“Most of these players are new and need time to bed in”.

“He needs at least the January window”.

It’s really hard to see what is going to change before Mowbray leaves. He has a contract until Summer 2022 and a CEO that won’t hold him to account. I could just as easily see his getting a new contract as leaving.

[Stuart]

1 hour ago, Athlete said:

IMHO Mowbray needs to go and has done for a long time along with Waggot and Venus 

Unless Venkys get lucky with a agency recommended appointment we will be rinse and repeating same scenarios with debt to the owners rising yearly .

The cancer will never go whilst owned by Venkys

I would take a admin and come out the otherside anyday

It’s interesting isn’t it. The link between SEM, HSH and our managers is strong.

But why don’t Venky’s just appoint a different organisation to run the club? Is Pasha employed by them? Are they bound by a long term contract? Is there a question (still) over ownership?

Do Venkys have any control or judgement or are their hands tied?

[gumboots]

As you know, I watch Sale Sharks. Yesterday they were well beaten in La Rochelle. They interviewed Alex Sanderson, the DOR, after the match. No bleating about the fact that Sale had 2 days less preparation time than La Rochelle then had to travel to France with all the Covid testing that entails. No whingeing about a possibly dodgy try awarded to La Rochelle. No complaints about anything. Just 'we could have been better.' He said that he was proud, as were most fans, of the way the players fought to the end, and of the effort they put in. He then said that he and his coaching team had probably got their preparation wrong and made mistakes in analysis and they would learn from it to be able to do better in future. He took responsibility. Players were nearly in tears when coming off because they knew they hadn't performed to their absolute best. Everyone took responsibility. No blame. No excuses. No waffle about journeys or possession or anything else. Just we won together last week. We lost together this week. We'll learn together this week to be better next week. 

That's how it should be at Rovers too. But it isn't and won't be while Mowbray is in charge. 

[Richard Oakley]

@Stuart The nighmarish scenario I think we want to avoid 'Venkys sell Blackburn Rovers to Jerome Anderson'. To add to your list.

[den]

A lot of twitterers saying “I accept that it’s time for Mowbray to go, but those that have been shouting for that for ages were well out of order. They’re nasty people and not real fans”

In other words, “they were right and I was wrong, but there’s no way I’m admitting that”.

Its astonishing how blooming naieve they are.

[Bigdoggsteel]

4 minutes ago, den said:

A lot of twitterers saying “I accept that it’s time for Mowbray to go, but those that have been shouting for that for ages were well out of order. They’re nasty people and not real fans”

In other words, “they were right and I was wrong, but there’s no way I’m admitting that”.

Its astonishing how blooming naieve they are.

Works on the flip side too, fans shouldn't be saying "they knew before others" it was time for him to go. No need for petty point scoring from either side. I just find it amazing some actually aren't in agreement that he has to go, or are likely to change that viewpoint. 

[Stuart]

22 minutes ago, den said:

A lot of twitterers saying “I accept that it’s time for Mowbray to go, but those that have been shouting for that for ages were well out of order. They’re nasty people and not real fans”

In other words, “they were right and I was wrong, but there’s no way I’m admitting that”.

Its astonishing how blooming naieve they are.

I get that you are paraphrasing but what a ridiculous notion these people have, that the earlier you notice something is getting worse and needs fixing the nastier a person you are - and the less of a “real fan” you are.

Putting it politely, the line is clearly different for different people.

Those who went early are the ones who believed promotion (or at least play-offs) was the target. Those who have joined later seem to think that the target is avoiding relegation.

In any case, it’s another failure which will need another bail out from Venkys and another step closer to administration.

[Mattyblue]

It’s done to harvest serotonin inducing social media likes and re-tweets... and they’ll always get plenty, as there’s a sizeable contingent of uber-pious, earnest folk on Twitter to tap into. It’s like a modern religion.

‘Look at me, aren’t I an example of a caring, thoughtful citizen #bekind’

Edited April 11, 2021 by Mattyblue

[chaddyrovers]

1 hour ago, Stuart said:

Is Pasha employed by them?

@J*Balready explained that Pasha and Babu worked for Balaji. 

Here is J*B post from 21st March on Pasha and Babu

Suhail Pasha, who has worked for the family since 2009 in a whole host of roles. He started off relatively low in the business but has done well and now has Balaji’s support. He does a whole host of jobs but is trusted to run Balaji’s investments and make decisions on his behalf. He’s well trusted and in the inner circle. He is currently living in the area and running Rovers, reporting directly back to Balaji. 

Gandhi Babu, he works between Zurich and Pune and manages Balaji’s group of investments of which Rovers is one. He’s trusted by Balaji and reports back to him on the progress of his investments individually and as a group. If you have a business and want investment from Venkys, you speak to Babu who decides whether it is worth it and if so, recommends it back up the ladder. 

Balaji trusts Mowbray because he thinks he’s honest. He’s been stung before by people taking advantage and he doesn’t think Mowbray is doing. So he has his support. 

To fulfil EFL requirements you must have someone they deem to be up to standard as CEO and FD. Mowbray was asked for recommendations on who could fit these roles, in came Waggott as CEO. They fulfil their obligations within the club but ultimately Waggott reports to Pasha and Cheston reports to Babu. Key decisions (from money to on the pitch) are taken by Pasha and Babu. 

https://www.brfcs.com/forums/topic/34120-tony-mowbray-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=2190737

 

 

Edited April 11, 2021 by chaddyrovers

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

40 minutes ago, den said:

A lot of twitterers saying “I accept that it’s time for Mowbray to go, but those that have been shouting for that for ages were well out of order. They’re nasty people and not real fans”

In other words, “they were right and I was wrong, but there’s no way I’m admitting that”.

Its astonishing how blooming naieve they are.

No doubt the same cretins who lambasted and ridiculed our protesting fans at Ewood...even in the face of such blatant wrongdoing at the time.

[Hoochie Bloochie Mama]

Anybody still think Mowbray's job is on the line?

[Mattyblue]

As long as we are just bobbing along in this league, no.

Only possibility is if we were marooned in the bottom 3 at some point, but even then I would see this geezer as safer than Bowyer or Coyle was. His ‘Honest Tone’ persona obviously goes down well with those fools in Pune...

Edited April 11, 2021 by Mattyblue

[davulsukur]

10 minutes ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said:

Anybody still think Mowbray's job is on the line?

Don't think it ever has been.

[oldjamfan1]

1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

@J*Balready explained that Pasha and Babu worked for Balaji. 

Here is J*B post from 21st March on Pasha and Babu

Suhail Pasha, who has worked for the family since 2009 in a whole host of roles. He started off relatively low in the business but has done well and now has Balaji’s support. He does a whole host of jobs but is trusted to run Balaji’s investments and make decisions on his behalf. He’s well trusted and in the inner circle. He is currently living in the area and running Rovers, reporting directly back to Balaji. 

Gandhi Babu, he works between Zurich and Pune and manages Balaji’s group of investments of which Rovers is one. He’s trusted by Balaji and reports back to him on the progress of his investments individually and as a group. If you have a business and want investment from Venkys, you speak to Babu who decides whether it is worth it and if so, recommends it back up the ladder. 

Balaji trusts Mowbray because he thinks he’s honest. He’s been stung before by people taking advantage and he doesn’t think Mowbray is doing. So he has his support. 

To fulfil EFL requirements you must have someone they deem to be up to standard as CEO and FD. Mowbray was asked for recommendations on who could fit these roles, in came Waggott as CEO. They fulfil their obligations within the club but ultimately Waggott reports to Pasha and Cheston reports to Babu. Key decisions (from money to on the pitch) are taken by Pasha and Babu. 

https://www.brfcs.com/forums/topic/34120-tony-mowbray-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=2190737

 

 

Thanks for that Chaddy - every day is a school day as they say. I didn’t know the background to Maggott pitching up at Rovers (other than the TM connection)

[Mattyblue]

If what J*B hears is true, it’s the constant lies that emanate from the club that riles me.

If it is true that Waggott has little power and has to report to Pasha, then why does he state that ‘all major decisions are made by me’ ? 

If Mowbray only speaks to Pasha and not the owners, why was he talking about speaking to them after every game only last week?

Risdale at Preston is titled ‘The Owner’s Representative’ and it is clear that he runs the place on his behalf. So why is this club’s operations all shrouded in mystery with a shadowy figure pulling the strings, fake titles (though not a fake wage) of ‘Chief Exec’ etc and the manager pretending he is in regular contact with detached owners? 

Why bother with it all?

 

 

[Stuart]

1 hour ago, Mattyblue said:

It’s done to harvest serotonin inducing social media likes and re-tweets... and they’ll always get plenty, as there’s a sizeable contingent of uber-pious, earnest folk on Twitter to tap into. It’s like a modern religion.

‘Look at me, aren’t I an example of a caring, thoughtful citizen #bekind’

The ones who use hashtags like “be kind” are usually the least tolerant and most hateful people in the world when they happen across someone they don’t agree with.

[K-Hod]

29 minutes ago, Stuart said:

The ones who use hashtags like “be kind” are usually the least tolerant and most hateful people in the world when they happen across someone they don’t agree with.

It’s nearly always the people that were the absolute worst growing up as well!