Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, K-Hod said:

That’s not what you said initially though, you then changed the question. 
Might help if you said what you meant?

The question could be construed either way. I clarified what I meant straight away for those who didn't get that. So why are you still going on about it? 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, tugayislegend said:

Bournemouth reject bid by Man United for josh king. Rovers due 20% sell on fee if deal goes through today. At least 5 million if it happens.

Always presumed it was 20% of the profit, which is still most of that figure seeing as we only ever got about £500k for him.

Posted
2 minutes ago, tugayislegend said:

Bournemouth reject bid by Man United for josh king. Rovers due 20% sell on fee if deal goes through today. At least 5 million if it happens.

Was that part of the compensation deal? I didn't see anything mentioned at the time 

Posted

But what about when Rovers were skint because these lot who apparently bankroll promotion bids turned the taps off.  Somebody put it out that they were cashing in all their sell on clauses and add ons for one off smaller payments ??

  • Like 1
Posted

Think that 20% is a Football Manager fairytale. He was a bosman so a development fee is way more likely.

Waldemer Anton was the one we went for late last January, strikes of this Faes fella

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Fraserkirky said:

Think that 20% is a Football Manager fairytale. He was a bosman so a development fee is way more likely.

No I'm pretty sure at the time of that trial hearing it was determined that it would be a small fee and sell on percentage, don't think that's just plucked out of thin air...

Posted

Rich Sharpe tells me he believes there IS a sell on clause!!

Posted
9 minutes ago, CambridgeRover said:

Was that part of the compensation deal? I didn't see anything mentioned at the time 

I quick search and found only that the clubs agreed on a fee. No info on sell on clause.

But can't imagne Rovers, who actually offered him a deal he rejected, didn't get a sell on when they avoided a tribunal. That's just insane if so.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Bigdoggsteel said:

Getting excited about a sell on fee on deadline day. The life of a Rovers fan ?

At least it's brought us all together for a little while!

  • Like 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bbrovers2288 said:

That would be a result if we got some money for king- personally don’t think he is Man Utd quality but you batter in ole 

I agree with you regarding him not being a " Man Utd " player. Lots of very good players have flopped there.

  • Like 1
Posted

Sell on fee doesn't work like a quick bank transfer into Tony Mowb's Lloyds and there's a cheeky 5mil and Jozwiaks a Rover. It'll be the summer before we see the effect of that compensation, but will help massively with FFP more than anything. 

Posted
Just now, roversfan99 said:

Even if he was sold we wouldnt suddenly start splashing out buying players at this late stage.

Hey hey less of that 

Seriously though,it might give us a bit more flex with wages,but I agree I doubt we would splash it, but Curtis at 3 million......

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.