Supporters Consultation Meeting

[chaddyrovers]

[chaddyrovers]

[chaddyrovers]

[chaddyrovers]

[Oldgregg86]

Fair play to anyone that went to listen to the same speech for the sixth time

[G Somerset Rover]

Surely they’ll get a caning for our lack of defensive bodies brought in during the summer?

[chaddyrovers]

[chaddyrovers]

[Tom]

Is £2.5m for a league one player that bad? Especially compared to Brereton 

[Tom]

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18217435.live-updates-rovers-supporters-consultation-meeting/

 

All chaddys pictures are coming from here if you’d prefer to read it at the source 

[chaddyrovers]

 

[Atko's Engine]

14 minutes ago, Tom said:

Is £2.5m for a league one player that bad? Especially compared to Brereton 

Arguably yes, if said player had a contract expiring in the summer (Maddison)

[Inglorious basturk]

15 minutes ago, Tom said:

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18217435.live-updates-rovers-supporters-consultation-meeting/

 

All chaddys pictures are coming from here if you’d prefer to read it at the source 

Chaddy isn’t there ? What a strange thing to do . The answer are how I expected . It’s a bit easier to weave a story around what has happened after . 
 

[Stuart]

We can never have the kind of players you need to get promoted because Mowbray can’t integrate higher earners into the team.

Great stuff.

What exactly is our plan to get out of this cycle of failure and rising debt...?

[Tom]

Waggott ‘went to bat’ for the fans to ensure we didn’t have a season ticket price increase and stopped us having to wear an opposition kit by introducing a third kit!

[Inglorious basturk]

Just now, Tom said:

Waggott ‘went to bat’ for the fans to ensure we didn’t have a season ticket price increase and stopped us having to wear an opposition kit by introducing a third kit!

He actually said this ? Why would we wear an oppositions kit ? That just doesn’t happen now 

[Leonard Venkhater]

1 minute ago, Tom said:

Waggott ‘went to bat’ for the fans to ensure we didn’t have a season ticket price increase and stopped us having to wear an opposition kit by introducing a third kit!

"I'm on your side.."

[Stuart]

6 minutes ago, Tom said:

Waggott ‘went to bat’ for the fans to ensure we didn’t have a season ticket price increase and stopped us having to wear an opposition kit by introducing a third kit!

These guys...

[Tom]

5 minutes ago, Inglorious basturk said:

He actually said this ? Why would we wear an oppositions kit ? That just doesn’t happen now 

Apologies it was Tony 

“TM said he wanted to prevent Rovers having to play in an opposition's kit.”

[Inglorious basturk]

Just now, Tom said:

Apologies it was Tony 

“TM said he wanted to prevent Rovers having to play in an opposition's kit.”

Just as daft , in these days of squad numbers there is no way we would wear an opposition kit . There wouldn’t be a full squad of the home teams away kit ( match specifications ) the sponsors wouldn’t allow it etc . Is he daft or do they think we are daft ?? 
I agree with tombola re away fans but don’t make exceptions for Leeds and Preston 

[Mike E]

Rather than all the January BS, has anything been said about ownership? Finances? Commerciality? Tony Parkes?

Y'know, the actual agenda? We should reject Tony (or any manager) being part of these meetings, that's not what they should be!

Should be board members and relevant members of staff. It's NOTHING to do with the playing side.

[Mashed Potatoes]

Just now, Mike E said:

Rather than all the January BS, has anything been said about ownership? Finances? Commerciality? Tony Parkes?

Y'know, the actual agenda? We should reject Tony (or any manager) being part of these meetings, that's not what they should be!

Should be board members and relevant members of staff. It's NOTHING to do with the playing side.

It's amazing you were not there, isn't it ?

[Ossydave]

Surely the playing in opposition kit was a joke by TM, that's how I read it anyway but its hard to tell from just reading Sharps commentary. 

[magicalmortensleftpeg]

4 minutes ago, Mike E said:

Rather than all the January BS, has anything been said about ownership? Finances? Commerciality? Tony Parkes?

Y'know, the actual agenda? We should reject Tony (or any manager) being part of these meetings, that's not what they should be!

Should be board members and relevant members of staff. It's NOTHING to do with the playing side.

Have you read any of the live blog?

If Tony wasn’t there you’d be criticising him for not fronting up to the fans.

[Hasta]

It does happen.