Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, perthblue02 said:

Brentford 2 up at Fulham, not a good result for our play off push

 What play-off push ?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Admiral Nelsen said:

We have three injured full backs who otherwise would have played. Bennett is a limited player, but is there anything to be gained by implying that he's so bad that he isn't up to being a reserve in the second tier? 

I suspect that comment was not just based on his inclusion today. 

Posted
Just now, Admiral Nelsen said:

We have three injured full backs who otherwise would have played. Bennett is a limited player, but is there anything to be gained by implying that he's so bad that he isn't up to being a reserve in the second tier? 

Bennett shouldn’t be in the team, and definitely not at full back. No need to find reasons to justify it.

  • Like 4
Posted

iFollow seems to be holding up very well so far. Crystal clear. Although we do have adverts now!

Posted
22 minutes ago, Doogs said:

How many clubs today will start with their leading goalscorer from last season, and this season both on the bench?

Didnt Kun start on the bench for city mid week?

Posted
6 minutes ago, J*B said:

iFollow seems to be holding up very well so far. Crystal clear. Although we do have adverts now!

/Not in my case , can't even sign in !!!

Posted

I’ve done myself no favours watching archive footage of when we had decent footballers at the club (even 2 different stints in this division).

That looks a grim xi. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Mattyblue said:

A fair few folk are struggling to even log in, ‘technical problem, please try again later’

At 5pm perhaps when the server can cope?

That’s the message I’m getting too.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Tom said:

Points to anyone that got that lineup spot on!

9 man bench and no place for Chapman or Smallwood 

My worries with the team are twofold.

1) the full backs look very weak. I like JRC but in a role further forward. Bennett is just a liability there. 

2) Beeston - no where near as good as Armstrong or Graham so it's disappointing to see him start ahead of them. If he starts with Gally shunted wide right then it's even more criminal. 

On the subs am disappointed no Chapman or Smallwood. Both may have limitations but both offer something very specific, with a very specific strength. Whilst that might not be enough to warrent a place in the first 11, with 9 subs, having said skills available doesn't seem a gamble and feels like it would be useful to have in our "toolbox" so to speak. Interestingly Mulgrew is back on the bench which could be a big option/impact sub for us. 

  • Moderation Lead
Posted

‘Sorry, but there has been a problem signing you in. Please try again later.’

Sounds about right....

Posted (edited)

As proposed earlier, willing to give BB a go at the tip of the restart just for the purely personal and time-limited curiosity of seeing if these "they do it in training" players perform any differently without an audience. Enough said about Bennett though.

Not gonna make any predictions. Uncharted territory.

Edited by CD_93
Posted

I’m told they’re due to reset everything close to kick off and that will allow all to log back in. Mines still working fine and very good quality. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.