tomphil Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Just because Hughes didn't fulfill his early promise as a top end Prem manager doesn't mean he's a bad one either. We are a midtable Championship outfit with the facilities, backing and potential be a top end one. We need to be getting blood out of stones and in some cases using what resources we have to better effect. Hughes was a good fit here last time so maybe he could be again although he'd need to be realistic in his expectations of salary etc. Also would be much better with as many of his Tafia as possible but to write him off given our current status is a bit daft. 1 Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Mattyblue Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 People seem to think he’s been terrible ever since leaving us. Been more mixed than that. He was at Stoke for five years and they were comfortable enough in the PL for the most part. 3 Quote
LeftWinger Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 I think he did alright at Stoke before going off towards the end when he got sacked. But he was fired from his last job over two years ago (Southampton), where he had a win percentage of 18.5% in 27 games. He was also pretty poor at QPR where he lost 58.8% of his 34 games. I'd still take him back though. Quote
JHRover Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Its just not going to happen is it. In the event Mowbray goes it will all be about preserving the status quo with Johnson, Lowe and Benson part of the furniture. Any new manager would be expected to work with them. I don't necessarily think that is a cost based decision just that there's a reluctance to bin off nice guys who have been here for years Unfortunately the best managers take their own coaching staff with them so those willing to work with whoever they inherit tend to be those just grateful to be getting a job. Remember Coyle was supposedly meant to be working with Irvine and Kelly, which was presumably one of the reasons he got the job rather than Warnock who insisted on bringing Blackwell and Jepson along. Once he was in Coyle then managed to bring his cronies in later. Quote
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted November 3, 2020 Moderation Lead Posted November 3, 2020 Seeing a few comments about negativity on here, well, if losing over half of our games certainly makes me feel less optimistic! This is the kind of game where Mowbray pulls out a result tbh. Seen some very inflated numbers about 12 first teamers out! No way it’s that many on our injury list! After a quick Google- I’ve found 5 injuries, 3 isolating with Covid? This was from an article yesterday.... 3 Quote
Oldgregg86 Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 5 minutes ago, JHRover said: Its just not going to happen is it. In the event Mowbray goes it will all be about preserving the status quo with Johnson, Lowe and Benson part of the furniture. Any new manager would be expected to work with them. I don't necessarily think that is a cost based decision just that there's a reluctance to bin off nice guys who have been here for years Unfortunately the best managers take their own coaching staff with them so those willing to work with whoever they inherit tend to be those just grateful to be getting a job. Remember Coyle was supposedly meant to be working with Irvine and Kelly, which was presumably one of the reasons he got the job rather than Warnock who insisted on bringing Blackwell and Jepson along. Once he was in Coyle then managed to bring his cronies in later. I think when the venkys said they would keep the values of the club, family feel being one of them they might be taking it to literally. Quote
Hoochie Bloochie Mama Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18841943.blackburn-boss-tony-mowbray-awaiting-bradley-dacks-return/ Did he mention we have injuries? 1 Quote
Backroom Tom Posted November 3, 2020 Backroom Posted November 3, 2020 May be the last midweek game I watch for a while. No games on the red button this week, presume that will be the same going forward Quote
Mattyblue Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Tom said: May be the last midweek game I watch for a while. No games on the red button this week, presume that will be the same going forward Sky can only show 8 midweek rounds on the red button per their contract. “ ‘cos COVID “ there are 14 midweek rounds this season, so some weeks will be no red button. Edited November 3, 2020 by Mattyblue 2 Quote
CrouchingNunhiddenCucumber Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 1 hour ago, K-Hod said: Seeing a few comments about negativity on here, well, if losing over half of our games certainly makes me feel less optimistic! This is the kind of game where Mowbray pulls out a result tbh. Seen some very inflated numbers about 12 first teamers out! No way it’s that many on our injury list! After a quick Google- I’ve found 5 injuries, 3 isolating with Covid? This was from an article yesterday.... I think you'll find we are midway through his latest death spiral, sadly. 1 Quote
CrouchingNunhiddenCucumber Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 52 minutes ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said: https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18841943.blackburn-boss-tony-mowbray-awaiting-bradley-dacks-return/ Did he mention we have injuries? We have a lot of injuries/absentees, can't argue with that. Sadly though, this isn't the main reason we are where we are; it's down to Tony not being a good enough manager. I guess we can hardly expect him to admit as much in the press though so the 'woe is us' rhetoric will be ramped up until we stumble out of the latest death spiral. Quote
tugayislegend Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Would love for us to a grind out an ugly 1-0 win. Not bothered if we dont play well or not. Need to be organised, men behind the ball. Cant have the full backs bombing forward leaving gaps behind. Some how I dont think this will happen! 2 Quote
unleaded Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 First it’s the absence Darragh Lenihan that’s why we losing then it’s Cause Ayala cause of his groin then it’s Travis then so & so ... No manager is going to have ALL of his players all of the time ... Get on with it Mowbray... he’s just buying time ... all the whilst we droping in the table .... same old story every year .... 3 Quote
darrenrover Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 I'm unsure who's available or not but based on my assumptions, I'd line up as follows: The Greek Nyambe Lenihan Williams Holtby Trybull Dolan Buckley JRC Elliott Brereton I appreciate, it's a tad unconventional but despite our desperate injury situation, I wouldn't include either Evans or Gallagher in my starting eleven. I wouldn't normally go with a back 3 but feel that it suits our players available as long as the wing backs work the line and 2 central midfielders protect the back line, it could potentially work. It's playing a 'false 9' too, which I wouldn't normally suggest. I'm curious as to whether anyone else can suggest, which of our other youngsters could possibly feature, if any. It's imperative we keep it tight at the back, win the midfield battle and offer a goalscoring threat. Despite all, I'll still be paying my tenner and tuning in but in honesty, expect the worst. COYB!! Quote
yellowsubmarine Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said: https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/18841943.blackburn-boss-tony-mowbray-awaiting-bradley-dacks-return/ Did he mention we have injuries? He is just preparing his excuses in advance. Quote
tomphil Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Why bother even having a squad of well paid players with the attitude he and some of his blindest followers seem to have. Might as well just have a first 15 and dip into the U23s every time there's a lot of absentees. At least the shoulder shrugging excuses would become genuinely valid. It's 11 v 11 on the day with the same ball and the same rules but tactics only seem to be relevant when we hammer someone. Quote
Mercer Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Think this is indicative from Sharpe. When oh when will Mowbray stop this, IMO, feckin madness of players not in their natural positions. Rich Sharpe @richsharpe89 · 2h As for tonight, without Armstrong, wonder if Mowbray/Rovers might revert to the early post-lockdown approach, but with Elliott as the 'centre forward' and Gallagher and Brereton outside of him. Be a welcome boost to the midfield balance too if Rothwell is available. Quote
Ruaney Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Still baffling to me that Pears starts in goal tonight. Only been here 5 minutes and he's one of Mowbrays favourites. I wonder what he would have to do tonight for him to get dropped for the next game, he's already done more than required. The Greek lad should be given a chance. Has better credentials for a start! 3 Quote
DavidMailsTightPerm Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 2 hours ago, K-Hod said: Seeing a few comments about negativity on here, well, if losing over half of our games certainly makes me feel less optimistic! This is the kind of game where Mowbray pulls out a result tbh. Seen some very inflated numbers about 12 first teamers out! No way it’s that many on our injury list! After a quick Google- I’ve found 5 injuries, 3 isolating with Covid? This was from an article yesterday.... I make it 9 or 10 (depending if Rothwell back or not) - but agree appears inflated (unless of course more players out than released. Quote
roversfan99 Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 Just now, Ruaney said: Still baffling to me that Pears starts in goal tonight. Only been here 5 minutes and he's one of Mowbrays favourites. I wonder what he would have to do tonight for him to get dropped for the next game, he's already done more than required. The Greek lad should be given a chance. Has better credentials for a start! Im not sure he really does, they have played a similar number of games in their careers if you include Pears loan spell and half of Pears' games came at Championship level, I have no idea on the standard of Bulgarian football but I would be surprised if it is on par with Championship standard. That isnt a defence of Pears who instilled no confidence in either game and looked like a little boy really, but I dont see how it can be baffling not to play a kid who has come from a backwater of European football who none of us had heard of prior to signing. 2 hours ago, Tom said: May be the last midweek game I watch for a while. No games on the red button this week, presume that will be the same going forward As someone with a season pass, it does actually rankle a little when the red button is regularly an option for the home games for which essentially I have paid a tenner for to be fair. I didnt know that prior to the season. A happy medium would be that the games are a fiver a pop. 1 Quote
roversfan99 Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, DavidMailsTightPerm said: I make it 9 or 10 (depending if Rothwell back or not) - but agree appears inflated (unless of course more players out than released. I think hes including Vale and Butterworth who have a cameo in a dead rubber each. Quote
tomphil Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 (edited) Pears has something like 24 appearances in 4 years at Boro and his most games have come not even in the pro leagues for Gatesheed. Hardly surprising if he doesn't look the part he's far from it. If he's been brought in now as number 2 it begs more questions about what actually goes through their heads when they think they are improving the back line. Then again nepotism plays a big part in this regime. Edited November 3, 2020 by tomphil 5 Quote
Guest Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 20 minutes ago, Ruaney said: Still baffling to me that Pears starts in goal tonight. Only been here 5 minutes and he's one of Mowbrays favourites. I wonder what he would have to do tonight for him to get dropped for the next game, he's already done more than required. The Greek lad should be given a chance. Has better credentials for a start! Really? I have to disagree with this take personally. You've got two young goalkeepers in Pears and Stergiakis, one of which has considerable Championship experience in comparison to the other. I think with Kaminski fit we'd have shipped one less goal vs Reading (still a loss at 3-2) and one less goal vs Swansea (still a loss at 1-0). Pears hasn't been amazing but to say he's now "one of Mowbray's favourites" when it's clear he's not even the first choice goalkeeper is a bit over the top. How does Stergiakis have better credentials? Quote
Mercer Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 (edited) 18 minutes ago, JoeH said: Really? I have to disagree with this take personally. You've got two young goalkeepers in Pears and Stergiakis, one of which has considerable Championship experience in comparison to the other. I think with Kaminski fit we'd have shipped one less goal vs Reading (still a loss at 3-2) and one less goal vs Swansea (still a loss at 1-0). Pears hasn't been amazing but to say he's now "one of Mowbray's favourites" when it's clear he's not even the first choice goalkeeper is a bit over the top. How does Stergiakis have better credentials? Are you really being serious!?!? Pears has about 20 games experience in the entire Football League across a 4+ year career. Stergiakis has some 80 games' experience in the Bulgarian top league including Europa games. There is simply no comparison in terms of experience and I would suggest ability (you don't play the number of games Stergiakis has at that level unless you are capable). I think it's clear, Warnock didn't rate Pears and I know whose judgement (versus Mowbray) I trust on a footballer's abilities. Based on his unconvincing appearances for us so far, I think Pears is a disaster waiting to happen. A four year contract for Pears is, IMO, the height of footballing lunacy. Just where was he going until Mowbray stepped in? Edited November 3, 2020 by Mercer 6 Quote
Dolly blue Posted November 3, 2020 Posted November 3, 2020 With regard to “ The Pears debate”....and who has the better credentials, he or the Greek....neither was the answer when they were signed. They are both perfect examples of poor scouting , panic signings. ....but , for Pears he has much against him... 1 Warnock saw he had little to offer ...got rid. 2 He’s been given a 4 year deal ( scandalous ) 3 He’s not big enough to cope with the physicality of the championship 4 He’s the son of Mowbray’s mate 5 He’s yet another “ Boro lad “ who takes our money but gives us nowt He will have to endure the negative criticism which Rovers fans level at him..............quite wrong.........level it at Mowbray. 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.