Kit supplier and sponsor from 21/22

[nbdrovers]

scanning the faces at the end of that new promo video.. there's one that looks remarkably like tom lawrence.. but it could also be bucko.. the cropping makes it difficult to see for me. any thoughts? 

[nbdrovers]

1 minute ago, goozburger said:

It's not Tom Lawrence. A quick image search suggests his nose was broken at some point. I think it's Bucko.

did have a glance at some images, but didn't spot the broken nose!

[RoversClitheroe]

2 hours ago, nbdelboy said:

scanning the faces at the end of that new promo video.. there's one that looks remarkably like tom lawrence.. but it could also be bucko.. the cropping makes it difficult to see for me. any thoughts? 

That's John Buckley

Edited July 1, 2022 by RoversClitheroe

[chaddyrovers]

2 hours ago, goozburger said:

Home kit to be revealed on the 5th (Tuesday).

 

 

[1864roverite]

Looking at the Bolton away shirt here in westhoughton and I think is the rovers collar is similar it will be a lovely shirt it’s not a square collar and it’s kit exactly a round collar but the shirt does look great

[damo100]

1 hour ago, 1864roverite said:

Looking at the Bolton away shirt here in westhoughton and I think is the rovers collar is similar it will be a lovely shirt it’s not a square collar and it’s kit exactly a round collar but the shirt does look great

This one?

[Upside Down]

1 hour ago, goozburger said:

We talk about sponsors ruining our shirts, but Bolton's is on another level.

Looks like he's trying to fag a lift off someone. 

[Ossydave]

Hell fire what a sponsor 🤣 Actually looks a decent shirt too apart from that

[1864roverite]

12 hours ago, damo100 said:

This one?

No the blue away shirt

[Riversider28]

13 hours ago, damo100 said:

This one?

It’s polite to say please.

[RoversClitheroe]

Alleged leak

[glen9mullan]

1 minute ago, RoversClitheroe said:

Alleged leak

 

[Polky]

 

I was hoping for something similar to this…but beggars can’t be choosers.

[RoversClitheroe]

16 minutes ago, glen9mullan said:

 

Ooo I'm a fan of that collar

[windymiller7]

Halves don't look reversed though looking at the darker area to the right just under the label. Could be wrong & it could be just the shoulder panel detail.

[Gordon Gekko]

Not sure about this one 

[damo100]

[J*B]

Those are all, 100%, the kits.
 

A very simple question for those of you that meet with Steve Waggott, which he should be able to answer:

When other kits are produced, they’re sent with the sponsor already printed to the shirt. Why is ours different? 

I’d love to know his reply. 

[damo100]

8 minutes ago, J*B said:

Those are all, 100%, the kits.
 

A very simple question for those of you that meet with Steve Waggott, which he should be able to answer:

When other kits are produced, they’re sent with the sponsor already printed to the shirt. Why is ours different? 

I’d love to know his reply. 

Maybe Chaddy could forward this when he meets with him.

[Gumbi]

12 minutes ago, J*B said:

Those are all, 100%, the kits.
 

A very simple question for those of you that meet with Steve Waggott, which he should be able to answer:

When other kits are produced, they’re sent with the sponsor already printed to the shirt. Why is ours different? 

I’d love to know his reply. 

It's so the club can print the sponsor off centre...

I would imagine the reasoning this year I'd due to the sponsor not being finalised until recently. It could also because the Ladies team has a different sponsor so it's easier to send blank shirts and print them accordingly.

[J*B]

4 minutes ago, Gumbi said:

It's so the club can print the sponsor off centre...

I would imagine the reasoning this year I'd due to the sponsor not being finalised until recently. It could also because the Ladies team has a different sponsor so it's easier to send blank shirts and print them accordingly.

Good knowledge!
 

Macron don’t design issue different fits for mens and womens teams - it’s the same shirt. But they do print different sponsors on to different shirts, eg 3000 with the mens sponsor and 500 with the ladies sponsor.

If you don’t get them to do it at source, you use a company like Elms to add the sponsor once the shirts arrive in the UK - but that costs you (Rovers) money to print every kit. So again, Steve (if you’re reading), why have Rovers had to have the sponsors added at our own cost, rather than at source, and exactly how much did that decision cost?

[Tom]

Home and third kits look nice enough, always keen on red accents on the home kit and the rose is a nice touch on the third 

But what the hell is that away kit about, it’s lazy and pointless, should have just scrapped it or used as a third if necessary 

[IrelandsRover]

Any chance of being able to purchase without the sponsor

that would be great thanks 

[Sparks Rover]

56 minutes ago, J*B said:

Good knowledge!
 

Macron don’t design issue different fits for mens and womens teams - it’s the same shirt. But they do print different sponsors on to different shirts, eg 3000 with the mens sponsor and 500 with the ladies sponsor.

If you don’t get them to do it at source, you use a company like Elms to add the sponsor once the shirts arrive in the UK - but that costs you (Rovers) money to print every kit. So again, Steve (if you’re reading), why have Rovers had to have the sponsors added at our own cost, rather than at source, and exactly how much did that decision cost?

Normally about £3-£4 per top depending on the colours in the sponsors logo.  So on 3500 tops it's a pretty penny.

[Ghost7]

Is there any pattern or detail on the navy away kit? It looks extremely basic.

I'll also be disappointed if the badges are stickers and not embroidered like they were in the past and are on the training wear.