Brockhall STC - planning permission application ?

[Mattyblue]

Just now, Herbie6590 said:

Are we TOTALLY out of the woods ? 🤔

Is that not just a face saving statement as it’s kicked into the long grass?

[Hoochie Bloochie Mama]

Just now, Tom said:

Well now it will be!

👏

[Herbie6590]

1 minute ago, Mattyblue said:

Is that not just a face saving statement as it’s kicked into the long grass?

I hope so...but until Waggott departs I’m ruling nothing out frankly...😬

[oldjamfan1]

2 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said:

Are we TOTALLY out of the woods ? 🤔

 

 

“current form” worries me....

I completely understand why you would think this Ian, but I do think you might be reading too much into what is essentially a face-saving statement.

[MarkBRFC]

2 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

Is that not just a face saving statement as it’s kicked into the long grass?

Not necessarily, having experience in this field that statement is used regularly, sometimes it can be used as a face saving statement and sometimes it can be that they will go away and tweak it to try again in the future. 

Hopefully it is the former.

Edited April 9, 2021 by MarkBRFC

[LDRover]

Well done to the residents, the letter writers and the general opposers of the scheme.

However, isn't it unbelievable that the statement tries to paint the picture that this whole thing was designed to strengthen the club? More utter bilge for the FB illuminati to pull themselves daft over.

Edited April 9, 2021 by LDRover

[DE.]

Good news. Let's hope it's soon followed up with the sacking/resignation of Waggott, Mowbray and Venus.

[Hoochie Bloochie Mama]

“As part of the planning process, we ran a comprehensive public consultation to explore the views of the supporters and local residents about the initial proposals and to understand more about what matters to our fanbase and the community in Brockhall and Old Langho"

translation: Waggott was totally out of touch with the fans and the local community around Brockhall. 

[Herbie6590]

1 minute ago, oldjamfan1 said:

I completely understand why you would think this Ian, but I do think you might be reading too much into what is essentially a face-saving statement.

Hope so...🤞🏻

[Mattyblue]

2 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Not necessarily, having experience in this field that statement is used regularly, sometimes it can be used as a face saving statement and sometimes it can be that they will go away and tweak it to try again in the future. 

Possibly, certainly something to be cognisant of if this shower remain in situ. But the fact it’s been withdrawn as quickly as it was proposed will hopefully mean there’s more removals to come.

Edited April 9, 2021 by Mattyblue

[arbitro]

It's reassuring to know we still have fans who care and put some pressure on Waggott and Co in various ways. Even a post on this message board will have helped so nobody should underestimate their involvement. Special appreciation to Revidgeblue for his forensic work in putting the excellent letter together. I also know others have been active in the background so thanks to you also.

Fans 1 - Coventrio 0

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

Looking at other options?

A victory for all involved.

[RevidgeBlue]

8 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said:

Are we TOTALLY out of the woods ? 🤔

 

 

“current form” worries me....

One step at a time, I think this is fantastic news personally.

I'm over the moon.

[Hoochie Bloochie Mama]

Just now, arbitro said:

It's reassuring to know we still have fans who care and put some pressure on Waggott and Co in various ways. Even a post on this message board will have helped so nobody should underestimate their involvement. Special appreciation to Revidgeblue for his forensic work in putting the excellent letter together. I also know others have been active in the background so thanks to you also.

Fans 1 - Coventrio 0

I sent the Letter to David Conn, Henry Winter and Gary Lineker.

I have no idea why I sent it to Gary Lineker. It makes no sense. 

[davulsukur]

8 minutes ago, Tom said:

Well now it will be!

😂😂

[Hoochie Bloochie Mama]

Just now, RevidgeBlue said:

One step at a time, I think this is fantastic news personally.

I'm over the moon.

Every credit for taking the time to put the letter together. It was a good 'un👍

[den]

Just now, RevidgeBlue said:

One step at a time, I think this is fantastic news personally.

I'm over the moon.

Thought you would be.

As Arbitro said, your letter would have played its part. 

Well done Simon.

[windymiller7]

3 minutes ago, Hoochie Bloochie Mama said:

“As part of the planning process, we ran a comprehensive public consultation to explore the views of the supporters and local residents about the initial proposals and to understand more about what matters to our fanbase and the community in Brockhall and Old Langho"

translation: Waggott was totally out of touch with the fans and the local community around Brockhall. 

I actually translated that as "we got busted & then got our pants pulled down when someone looked into the details"

As others have said, well done to all who put in a lot of hard work. 👋

[oldjamfan1]

2 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

One step at a time, I think this is fantastic news personally.

I'm over the moon.

You should pour yourself a glass of something nice Simon. You should also never have to buy a drink at Ewood ever again. Well done mate!

[Waggy76]

Hopefully this will see the removal from office of the Coventrio !!!

[1864roverite]

Here Endeth 1 conspiracy theory!

Now for gods sake remove the cancer running through the management 🤬

[RevidgeBlue]

5 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

Possibly, certainly something to be cognisant of if this shower remain in situ. But the fact it’s been withdrawn as quickly as it was proposed will hopefully mean there’s more removals to come.

Yes hopefully.

This must be the most enormous embarrassment for Waggott.

Given that so much store was set by not providing plans of any alleged new training facility, because it was supposedly too expensive, how much money must we have wasted progressing the scheme this far only to bin it?

Plus Waggott has needlessly alienated the local residents near Brockhall who previously were quite happy with the relationship between themselves and the Club.

A trio of sackings to follow and this would be a fantastic weekend regardless of the result tomorrow.

[Mattyblue]

4 minutes ago, 1864roverite said:

Here Endeth 1 conspiracy theory!

Now for gods sake remove the cancer running through the management 🤬

If we see certain individuals also removed in coming days, then ‘conspiracy theory’, it wasn’t.

[RevidgeBlue]

4 minutes ago, 1864roverite said:

Here Endeth 1 conspiracy theory!

Now for gods sake remove the cancer running through the management 🤬

Does it not tend to show there was one?

Not having a go it's a happy day.

[arbitro]

Although it's time to rejoice I can't help myself dislike Waggott even more than before. For the disdain and disrespect he showed Rovers he shouldn't be anywhere near our great club. From the outset this has been so poorly handled it's like a Brian Rix farce. Awfully worded announcements, ill conceived ideas and factually incorrect statements have shown him up for what he is.

Now do the honourable thing Swag and leave our club forever.