Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 20/09/2021 at 18:40, rigger said:

OK, if you take everything literally so be it. Bye.

The rest of the human race knew what you meant.  Probably a few dogs and cats too.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 20/09/2021 at 18:15, chaddyrovers said:

Of course it is cos scans and x-rays will show the extent of the damage and where it is in the back the injury is. 

Rovers management team have to decide if he worth the risk. If he is back playing for his club then Rovers have a decision to make. If not Maja then Rovers need to sign a striker early in the January transfer window 

We were right not to sign him it seems, but we did also appear to put all our eggs in one basket and leave it very late in the window to find out this was a non-runner. We knew Armstrong was leaving 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

We were right not to sign him it seems, but we did also appear to put all our eggs in one basket and leave it very late in the window to find out this was a non-runner. We knew Armstrong was leaving 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nottinghamforest.news/2021/09/05/president-stunned-as-nottingham-forest-josh-maja-deal-collapses/amp/

Seems someone is lying, he can't have had 2 preferred clubs...my money is on Maggot...although Forest seem to have similar shysters in charge.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Sparks Rover said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nottinghamforest.news/2021/09/05/president-stunned-as-nottingham-forest-josh-maja-deal-collapses/amp/

Seems someone is lying, he can't have had 2 preferred clubs...my money is on Maggot...although Forest seem to have similar shysters in charge.

Maybe not someone lying though, one of us could have had the deal agreed, it fell apart cos of the medical, the other team moved in and then it fell apart following the medical too.

Either way, doesn't excuse the fact we didn't have a plan B and C 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

Maybe not someone lying though, one of us could have had the deal agreed, it fell apart cos of the medical, the other team moved in and then it fell apart following the medical too.

Either way, doesn't excuse the fact we didn't have a plan B and C 

Who's medical then on the last day? Ours or Forests?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said:

Both could have happened that day. It has happened with players before

Either way, too late for us , especially without a plan B 

Who's was first? Both say he was their top target....if he failed theirs did we just give it a whirl with ours, or vice versa.....

Someone is bullshitting here surely.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sparks Rover said:

Who's was first? Both say he was their top target....if he failed theirs did we just give it a whirl with ours, or vice versa.....

Someone is bullshitting here surely.

Hard to know really 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sparks Rover said:

You'd have thought any decent journalists would ask.....he was in front of them...🤷‍♂️ useless them lot at the LET and live. Nodding dogs

The LET do press releases more than journalism, unfortunately 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 20/09/2021 at 18:40, rigger said:

OK, if you take everything literally so be it. Bye.

 

5 hours ago, booth said:

The rest of the human race knew what you meant.  Probably a few dogs and cats too.

Indeed, it's a bit naughty as the meaning was clear. Even if you genuinely thought the timings were not a generalisation and a mistake the point still stood. 

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Blue blood said:

 

Indeed, it's a bit naughty as the meaning was clear. Even if you genuinely thought the timings were not a generalisation and a mistake the point still stood. 

Yep and straight away he's defending the manager he wants sacking 🤷‍♂️

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Sparks Rover said:

Yep and straight away he's defending the manager he wants sacking 🤷‍♂️

That's ok - he's entitled to his opinion, even if it does seem a bit contradictory and confusing. 

 Imo It's less ok to deliberately misunderstand other people's posts. 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 23/09/2021 at 12:23, Bigdoggsteel said:

We were right not to sign him it seems, but we did also appear to put all our eggs in one basket and leave it very late in the window to find out this was a non-runner. We knew Armstrong was leaving 

Well we late finalise the Maja transfer far too late. 

Yes we did know that Armstrong was leaving but it appears that the terms werent right so they wait. 

Mowbray explained what happened on the final 3 days of the transfer window. I expect we go back in for him in January. 

If we had sign Maja then you would have been happy? would you be happy if we sign Oliver Burke?

Posted
6 hours ago, Ricky said:

Not going to get Sturridge on a free as he’s gone to Perth Glory

He was never coming here in the first place. And no other European club want him either. 

The fact that he has signed for a club in the A-league tell us he had little interest 

Posted
39 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

isn't it about Rangers wanting to sign Rothwell on a pre contract in January?

If you read the article it says Rovers could choose to sell in January

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.