Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, JacknOry said:

Poor

Thats because you keep asking me for odds on things that I don't think will happen. Not on things that I think will happen.

Edited by rigger
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, rigger said:

Thats because you keep asking me for odds on things that I don't think will happen. Not on things that I think will happen.

Well you should offer longer odds on it happening then?

Posted

 

54 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

The issue is not over paying in wages but it seems that we have only one allocated signing in a striker. Why the manager cant make 2 or 3 reasonably priced permanent signings within the supposed Obafemi budget rather than having to splash out on one sole striker is beyond me.

Depends what players are asking wage wise. 

I would like to see 2 or 3 permanent signings including a permanent replacement for Armstrong like Healey who I think we could get 3 or 4 million pounds. Plus 2 or 3 loan signings on top of that to get us 5 summer signings. 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Sparks Rover said:

Well you should offer longer odds on it happening then?

No I wouldn't give odds or take a bet on something I didn't believe.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

I wonder what positions the 5 loanees would be. If we got Khadra and Clarkson as well as "one, maybe 2 centre backs" as Mowbray said in the LT earlier, we still would look short in a few areas. We have no competition for Pickering who is finding his feet, we have no goal threat from midfield and even with Khedra and a striker added, i still would suggest that we would be lacking goals along the front line.

Edited by roversfan99
Posted
5 hours ago, bluefred said:

Midfielder not a striker???? How odd 

 

I wouldn't say so, we clearly need reinforcement in both areas. It's also possible to work on two deals at once.

Posted
5 hours ago, bluebruce said:

I wouldn't say so, we clearly need reinforcement in both areas. It's also possible to work on two deals at once.

At other clubs I would agree.

Posted
1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

Who looks at these obscure and worthless websites run by spotty teenagers let alone take them seriously as a source of news? If you want proper news that is fit to print read a national newspaper  that has stories sourced by credible and professional journalists. Anything else is clickbait for gullible people and a total waste of time

  • Like 3
Posted

Sandlier from City an absolute certainty I'd have thought given his pedigree. Signed by City in 2018 and continually plagued by injury.

Loaned to Anderlecht last season and managed 9 games.

C'mn Mowbray--- give this lad sanctuary.

  • Like 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, MarkBRFC said:

Go on then, I'll be the first....

"Plagued by injury?! He will fit in here then!"

But the reason why Man City bought him in the first place. Yes he has injuries but he may come back stronger than ever now 

Posted
23 minutes ago, TruRover said:

That would be a ridiculously good signing 

Lets hope we revisit signing him. I agree he would be good signing. But can we match his wage demands? 

Posted
Just now, chaddyrovers said:

But the reason why Man City bought him in the first place. Yes he has injuries but he may come back stronger than ever now 

Perhaps, because they have more ready money than sense.                        

Posted
2 minutes ago, rigger said:

Perhaps, because they have more ready money than sense.                        

and? 

He looks very good on clips of YouTube before his move to Man City. 

Could be a very decent signing

Posted
3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

and? 

He looks very good on clips of YouTube before his move to Man City. 

Could be a very decent signing

But we are not in a financial position to take a risk on an injury prone player, who may or may not turn out to be a decent signing. It doesn't matter how good someone looks on You Tube clips. 

  • Like 5
Posted
24 minutes ago, 47er said:

Sandlier from City an absolute certainty I'd have thought given his pedigree. Signed by City in 2018 and continually plagued by injury.

Loaned to Anderlecht last season and managed 9 games.

C'mn Mowbray--- give this lad sanctuary.

Played some games for their under 23s at end of season. So it's more a case of of good player, now fit and needs games. Happy with this one

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, rigger said:

But we are not in a financial position to take a risk on an injury prone player, who may or may not turn out to be a decent signing. It doesn't matter how good someone looks on You Tube clips. 

and given that Man City will have one of the best medical departments in the game. I hope his injuries are over with now. Never good seeing any players who has long term injuries. He appears to have played some under 23's football last season

I am in favour of signings a 2/3 of cash transfers plus a 2/3 of loans. A striker coming in permanent needed sorting this week.  

Edited by chaddyrovers
Posted
7 minutes ago, rigger said:

But we are not in a financial position to take a risk on an injury prone player, who may or may not turn out to be a decent signing. It doesn't matter how good someone looks on You Tube clips. 

Given this is a loan, I am assuming our financial outlay will be minimal. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.