Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Summer transfer window 2021.

chaddyrovers
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

oldjamfan1
oldjamfan1

We were promised a big name signing and here he is.

Angry_Pirate
Angry_Pirate

That article makes my blood boil. Mowbray logic: "We can't offer new contracts to Lenihan, Nyambe and Rothwell when others in the world are being Furloughed, so their contracts will have to run d

JHRover
JHRover

Quite astonishing that it seems some people are willing to just erase last season.  I fully understand that some are desperate to get back to watching live football at Ewood (I dearly wish I was

Posted Images

chaddyrovers

chaddyrovers

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

54 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

The issue is not over paying in wages but it seems that we have only one allocated signing in a striker. Why the manager cant make 2 or 3 reasonably priced permanent signings within the supposed Obafemi budget rather than having to splash out on one sole striker is beyond me.

Depends what players are asking wage wise. 

I would like to see 2 or 3 permanent signings including a permanent replacement for Armstrong like Healey who I think we could get 3 or 4 million pounds. Plus 2 or 3 loan signings on top of that to get us 5 summer signings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
roversfan99 World Cup

roversfan99

Posted
Posted (edited)

I wonder what positions the 5 loanees would be. If we got Khadra and Clarkson as well as "one, maybe 2 centre backs" as Mowbray said in the LT earlier, we still would look short in a few areas. We have no competition for Pickering who is finding his feet, we have no goal threat from midfield and even with Khedra and a striker added, i still would suggest that we would be lacking goals along the front line.

Edited by roversfan99
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jim mk2

jim mk2

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

Rovers after Man City defender Philippe Sandler who is 24 years old

https://the72.co.uk/245188/blackburn-rovers-could-sign-manchester-citys-philippe-sandler-on-loan-next-week/

Who looks at these obscure and worthless websites run by spotty teenagers let alone take them seriously as a source of news? If you want proper news that is fit to print read a national newspaper  that has stories sourced by credible and professional journalists. Anything else is clickbait for gullible people and a total waste of time

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
47er

47er

Posted
Posted

Sandlier from City an absolute certainty I'd have thought given his pedigree. Signed by City in 2018 and continually plagued by injury.

Loaned to Anderlecht last season and managed 9 games.

C'mn Mowbray--- give this lad sanctuary.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rigger World Cup

rigger

Posted
Posted
Just now, chaddyrovers said:

But the reason why Man City bought him in the first place. Yes he has injuries but he may come back stronger than ever now 

Perhaps, because they have more ready money than sense.                        

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rigger World Cup

rigger

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

and? 

He looks very good on clips of YouTube before his move to Man City. 

Could be a very decent signing

But we are not in a financial position to take a risk on an injury prone player, who may or may not turn out to be a decent signing. It doesn't matter how good someone looks on You Tube clips. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gavrover Premier League

Gavrover

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, 47er said:

Sandlier from City an absolute certainty I'd have thought given his pedigree. Signed by City in 2018 and continually plagued by injury.

Loaned to Anderlecht last season and managed 9 games.

C'mn Mowbray--- give this lad sanctuary.

Played some games for their under 23s at end of season. So it's more a case of of good player, now fit and needs games. Happy with this one

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chaddyrovers

chaddyrovers

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, rigger said:

But we are not in a financial position to take a risk on an injury prone player, who may or may not turn out to be a decent signing. It doesn't matter how good someone looks on You Tube clips. 

and given that Man City will have one of the best medical departments in the game. I hope his injuries are over with now. Never good seeing any players who has long term injuries. He appears to have played some under 23's football last season

I am in favour of signings a 2/3 of cash transfers plus a 2/3 of loans. A striker coming in permanent needed sorting this week.  

Edited by chaddyrovers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.