Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Ivan Toney again would come with a huge premium because he is English. Hes a decent Premier League striker but certainly not one for a Champions League side.

Hes an all round forward.  Hes a typical old style English forward. Far better than the likes of Calvert-Lewin or Wilson 

Posted
2 minutes ago, roverandout said:

Hes an all round forward.  Hes a typical old style English forward. Far better than the likes of Calvert-Lewin or Wilson 

No way is he better than Wilson 

  • Like 4
Posted
6 minutes ago, Oldgregg86 said:

No way is he better than Wilson 

From the games I've seen him play he's strong quick.  Holds the ball up well. Expert penalty taker. I don't think Wilson has all those qualities 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, roverandout said:

From the games I've seen him play he's strong quick.  Holds the ball up well. Expert penalty taker. I don't think Wilson has all those qualities 

Game of opinions mate . I’d take Wilson if it was a choice. Far better finisher 

Edited by Oldgregg86
  • Like 1
Posted

It looks like the Chelsea owner is trying to make his mark and as a result, he is ready to throw crazy money around. He's spent £60m on Cucurella which is far too much, IMO. Now he's after Gordon for a similar price.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a last ditch move for Ronaldo before the window shuts. They've let Werner and Lukaku go. They don't have much height up there. Can somebody please point him in the direction of Sam Gallagher? That will be £20m notes for you, thank you, Mr Boehly.

Posted
38 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Cucurella was overpriced but at least he is one of the best in the league and an upgrade on what they have.

Not really.  I wouldn’t call him an upgrade on chilwell.  His stats don't match chilwells

Posted

Parker gone from Bournemouth, couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.

Posted

The Bournemouth owner probably didn't appreciate Parker demanding more investment publicly on the back of a 9-0 defeat.

Wonder where that leaves Rothwell? A new manager might not fancy him at all.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Mellor Rover said:

Parker gone from Bournemouth, couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.

A vastly overrated manager. Look at how Fulham improved when he left. Struggled to get them promoted too despite spending a load last season. And clearly unable to do anything when he isn't heavy favourite to win. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I see the media saying how hard done to he was and how hard it was for him to compete without backing. Such selective memories given what he spent in January. Amnesia it seems is rife in football. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Bang average manager but another example of how parachute money can propel even no marks like Parker to promotion.

And it’s why the Dingles will be up there.

Edited by Mattyblue
Posted

I was surprised by the news that Parker had been sacked but when you read the statement and read Parker's comments about lack of transfers happening, players coming in and lack of PL experience in the squad. After all that you can understand why they parted ways and where they look next. 

I think MK Dons's head coach Liam Manning might be the right choice to replace him. 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Blue blood said:

I see the media saying how hard done to he was and how hard it was for him to compete without backing. Such selective memories given what he spent in January. Amnesia it seems is rife in football. 

Championship players were brought in then and those players did the job they were brought in for to get them promoted. 

Parker was 100% right to call out the board on their lack of spending this summer.Relegation is a certainty with the squad of players they have.

I don't think Parker is a good manager but certainly think he has been hard done by getting sacked so early with minimal investment after succeeding in his objective of getting them promoted last season 

Posted (edited)

It's not much discussed in the media, from what I can tell, but the gap between the Premier League and the next tier has become even wider and we are effectively getting a domestic Super League with no relegation, because most relegated teams are likely to spring back up with the wealth they've attained. You'll have the same clubs circling the top flight, at this rate. It's not new but it's much worse, it seems, going off my impression.

It's enough to put me off professional football.

Edited by riverholmes
  • Like 6
Posted
4 minutes ago, riverholmes said:

It's not much discussed in the media, from what I can tell, but the gap between the Premier League and the next tier has become even wider and we are effectively getting a domestic Super League with no relegation, because most relegated teams are likely to spring back up with the wealth they've attained. You'll have the same clubs circling the top flight, at this rate. It's not new but it's much worse, it seems, going off my impression.

It's enough to put me off professional football.

That is pretty much what is happening. The last 4 years 2 of the promoted teams have been teams in receipt of parachute payments.

Posted
23 minutes ago, riverholmes said:

It's not much discussed in the media, from what I can tell, but the gap between the Premier League and the next tier has become even wider and we are effectively getting a domestic Super League with no relegation, because most relegated teams are likely to spring back up with the wealth they've attained. You'll have the same clubs circling the top flight, at this rate. It's not new but it's much worse, it seems, going off my impression.

It's enough to put me off professional football.

I've been saying this for the last 5 or 6 years. You're going to get 25 or so premier league teams and that's it soon. We picked the worst time to get relegated

Posted

Unfortunately, sadly it means that Bournemouth are a club with self-respect. With Venkys, we are not. Venkys have suffocated the life and soul of the club, to such an extent that we tolerate getting mauled by the likes of Fulham at home with 0 consequences at the time for the manager.

We will never really move forward with Venkys. 

  • Like 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. E said:

Unfortunately, sadly it means that Bournemouth are a club with self-respect. With Venkys, we are not. Venkys have suffocated the life and soul of the club, to such an extent that we tolerate getting mauled by the likes of Fulham at home with 0 consequences at the time for the manager.

We will never really move forward with Venkys. 

And add Dundee United to the list of clubs where 9-0 is apparently not acceptable. Who would have known there are things like acceptable standards. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

The Bournemouth owner probably didn't appreciate Parker demanding more investment publicly on the back of a 9-0 defeat.

Wonder where that leaves Rothwell? A new manager might not fancy him at all.

He could always just sit on his fat contract until it runs out, playing or not.

He has experience in managing such.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.