Hasta Posted March 8, 2023 Posted March 8, 2023 46 minutes ago, Dreams of 1995 said: If they don't go up this year it will be the final year of parachute payments having only spent 1 season in the PL last year, which means a fire sale of some supremely talented players As they came down last year they will have 2 more years left after this year of diminishing parachute payments won't they? Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Mattyblue Posted March 8, 2023 Posted March 8, 2023 As they only had one season in the PL, I believe they only get two seasons of parachute payments. 2 Quote
Dreams of 1995 Posted March 8, 2023 Posted March 8, 2023 19 minutes ago, Hasta said: As they came down last year they will have 2 more years left after this year of diminishing parachute payments won't they? By my understanding if you only survive one season in the Prem you only get 2 years of parachute payments 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted March 8, 2023 Author Posted March 8, 2023 22 hours ago, booth said: I don't know if it was Bilic's fault in particular as he's only been in the job 6 months, but Watford weren't doing great. Unfair to sack a manager who didn't even begin the season though. I just think it's run completely wrong and no chance to build a team there. Even successful head coaches don't survive like Javi Garcia or Xisco Munoz Quote
Upside Down Posted March 8, 2023 Posted March 8, 2023 It's the other end of the spectrum to where rovers are. But as I've said previously, at least they have ambition. Quote
Mattyblue Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 Watford have had as many managers since 2012 (18) as West Ham have had in their entire history… 3 Quote
Mattyblue Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 Cracking David Brent corporate away day vibes 4 Quote
booth Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 19 minutes ago, Mattyblue said: Cracking David Brent corporate away day vibes 4 Quote
roverandout Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 (edited) I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat. Delusions of grandeur come to mind Edited March 9, 2023 by roverandout Quote
Admiral Nelsen Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 9 minutes ago, roverandout said: I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat. Delusions of grandeur come to mind To be fair, that's exactly what he's trying to do. It just so happens that instead of having a team full of generational talents, he has a squad full of average second division players. It must be so frustrating for their fans seeing their team dominate the ball every game without doing anything with it. 3 Quote
Mattyblue Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 Hmm, a load of Championship cloggers in your side instead of Xavi, Iniesta et al might be a bit of an issue then. Pound Shop Peps all over the place these days… 2 Quote
Dreams of 1995 Posted March 9, 2023 Posted March 9, 2023 Watford under investigation for the transfer of Kamara Bought for cheap, sold expensively to Udinese and loaned back for the year “circumvent FFP” we keep getting told. It does not work 1 Quote
roversfan99 Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 Circumventing FFP is not what is needed, although legally I don't see how the Kamara deal is anything but clever use of a loophole. The key to keeping within FFP is not having owners that prevent player sales to allow for reinvestment. Quote
philipl Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 5 hours ago, roversfan99 said: Circumventing FFP is not what is needed, although legally I don't see how the Kamara deal is anything but clever use of a loophole. The key to keeping within FFP is not having owners that prevent player sales to allow for reinvestment. To sell a player for reinvestment, you need an offer of a decent amount of cash. Rothwell apart, that hasn't happened. And there would have been demonstrations at Ewood last January is 2nd placed Rovers had cashed in by selling to 3rd placed Bournemouth. Quote
Mattyblue Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 So? If the club thought it was a fair price it was a fair price, especially if the player’s head had turned (which it had). *And would there buggery have been ‘demonstrations at Ewood’ 😁 6 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted March 10, 2023 Author Posted March 10, 2023 18 hours ago, roverandout said: I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat. Delusions of grandeur come to mind I can understand why he wants copy Barca's tactics and style of play. Problem is the choice of signings he can make there 9 hours ago, Dreams of 1995 said: Watford under investigation for the transfer of Kamara Bought for cheap, sold expensively to Udinese and loaned back for the year “circumvent FFP” we keep getting told. It does not work Let's hope they get a transfer ban then. Tho I still can't believe they sacked Bilic and appointed Wilder. 9 hours ago, roversfan99 said: The key to keeping within FFP is not having owners that prevent player sales to allow for reinvestment. On Rothwell I agree on but on BBD I disagree. The offers we got for BBD wasn't near good enough Quote
Dreams of 1995 Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 9 hours ago, roversfan99 said: Circumventing FFP is not what is needed, although legally I don't see how the Kamara deal is anything but clever use of a loophole. A loophole is used to circumvent rules or regulations Is it not what is needed or is it clever? The statement is contradictory They are breaking the rules of fair competition. With any luck it breaks this so-called “successful” model that Watford have. It isn’t the first time they have used their Udinese connections to their advantage Quote
R0verb0y Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 It's surely one of those loopholes that those clever but naïve people who frame rules always think nobody will ever circumvent. Until they do. Quote
Hasta Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 4 hours ago, philipl said: And there would have been demonstrations at Ewood last January is 2nd placed Rovers had cashed in by selling to 3rd placed Bournemouth. When did demonstrations at Ewood ever bother the club? Quote
rigger Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 24 minutes ago, Hasta said: When did demonstrations at Ewood ever bother the club? Sack the board in the seventies. Quote
AllRoverAsia Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 (edited) 19 hours ago, roverandout said: I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat. Delusions of grandeur come to mind This article pretty much nails it on what has happened across the EFL and I include the Championship https://www.theguardian.com/football/when-saturday-comes-blog/2023/jan/18/lower-league-football-premier-league-pyramid Edited March 10, 2023 by AllRoverAsia 3 Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, AllRoverAsia said: This article pretty much nails it on what has happened across the EFL and I include the Chamionship https://www.theguardian.com/football/when-saturday-comes-blog/2023/jan/18/lower-league-football-premier-league-pyramid Bang on article. 2 Quote
roversfan99 Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 6 hours ago, philipl said: To sell a player for reinvestment, you need an offer of a decent amount of cash. Rothwell apart, that hasn't happened. And there would have been demonstrations at Ewood last January is 2nd placed Rovers had cashed in by selling to 3rd placed Bournemouth. Even if there would have been such negative fan reaction, which is nonsense. You don't run a football club like that, and they dont otherwise appointing Owen Coyle would never have crossed their mind. The key is to reinvest that money, we could have been so much better off with a big chunk of £12m+ reinvested rather than the alternative of 6 months of a disinterested Rothwell and a year of Brereton. 1 Quote
phili Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 3 hours ago, roversfan99 said: Even if there would have been such negative fan reaction, which is nonsense. You don't run a football club like that, and they dont otherwise appointing Owen Coyle would never have crossed their mind. The key is to reinvest that money, we could have been so much better off with a big chunk of £12m+ reinvested rather than the alternative of 6 months of a disinterested Rothwell and a year of Brereton. We wouldn't have got any cash, instead of Venky's injecting £20m they would have done £8m instead. You'd have just had a few less players. A normal club you'd be correct, with usit doesn't matter, logic goes out the window. If you look at Brentford, so long as they made a profit each player was sold once an offer was made and cash reinvested and I hope this is what we start happening. We used to do this all the time under the trust but the comments used to be why are we selling and not keeping the player etc. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.