Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Championship - 22-23


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

If they don't go up this year it will be the final year of parachute payments having only spent 1 season in the PL last year, which means a fire sale of some supremely talented players

As they came down last year they will have 2 more years left after this year of diminishing parachute payments won't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, booth said:

I don't know if it was Bilic's fault in particular as he's only been in the job 6 months, but Watford weren't doing great. Unfair to sack a manager who didn't even begin the season though.

I just think it's run completely wrong and no chance to build a team there. Even successful head coaches don't survive like Javi Garcia or Xisco Munoz 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat.  Delusions  of grandeur come to mind

Edited by roverandout
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, roverandout said:

I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat.  Delusions  of grandeur come to mind

 

To be fair, that's exactly what he's trying to do. 

It just so happens that instead of having a team full of generational talents, he has a squad full of average second division players. It must be so frustrating for their fans seeing their team dominate the ball every game without doing anything with it. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Circumventing FFP is not what is needed, although legally I don't see how the Kamara deal is anything but clever use of a loophole. 

The key to keeping within FFP is not having owners that prevent player sales to allow for reinvestment.

To sell a player for reinvestment, you need an offer of a decent amount of cash.

Rothwell apart, that hasn't happened. 

And there would have been demonstrations at Ewood last January is 2nd placed Rovers had cashed in by selling to 3rd placed Bournemouth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, roverandout said:

I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat.  Delusions  of grandeur come to mind

I can understand why he wants copy Barca's tactics and style of play. Problem is the choice of signings he can make there

9 hours ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

Watford under investigation for the transfer of Kamara 

Bought for cheap, sold expensively to Udinese and loaned back for the year 

“circumvent FFP” we keep getting told. It does not work 

Let's hope they get a transfer ban then. Tho I still can't believe they sacked Bilic and appointed Wilder. 

9 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

 

The key to keeping within FFP is not having owners that prevent player sales to allow for reinvestment.

On Rothwell I agree on but on BBD I disagree. 

The offers we got for BBD wasn't near good enough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Circumventing FFP is not what is needed, although legally I don't see how the Kamara deal is anything but clever use of a loophole. 

A loophole is used to circumvent rules or regulations 

Is it not what is needed or is it clever? 
The statement is contradictory 

They are breaking the rules of fair competition. With any luck it breaks this so-called “successful” model that Watford have. It isn’t the first time they have used their Udinese connections to their advantage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, philipl said:

And there would have been demonstrations at Ewood last January is 2nd placed Rovers had cashed in by selling to 3rd placed Bournemouth. 

When did demonstrations at Ewood ever bother the club?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, roverandout said:

I know this is a left field post but I read somewhere that Russell Martin compares his playing style and has been quoted that he lends his style off Barcelona and the great 08' 12 Spain side. He really is a deluded twat.  Delusions  of grandeur come to mind

This article pretty much nails it on what has happened across the EFL and I include the Championship

https://www.theguardian.com/football/when-saturday-comes-blog/2023/jan/18/lower-league-football-premier-league-pyramid

Edited by AllRoverAsia
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, philipl said:

To sell a player for reinvestment, you need an offer of a decent amount of cash.

Rothwell apart, that hasn't happened. 

And there would have been demonstrations at Ewood last January is 2nd placed Rovers had cashed in by selling to 3rd placed Bournemouth. 

Even if there would have been such negative fan reaction, which is nonsense. You don't run a football club like that, and they dont otherwise appointing Owen Coyle would never have crossed their mind. The key is to reinvest that money, we could have been so much better off with a big chunk of £12m+ reinvested rather than the alternative of 6 months of a disinterested Rothwell and a year of Brereton.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

Even if there would have been such negative fan reaction, which is nonsense. You don't run a football club like that, and they dont otherwise appointing Owen Coyle would never have crossed their mind. The key is to reinvest that money, we could have been so much better off with a big chunk of £12m+ reinvested rather than the alternative of 6 months of a disinterested Rothwell and a year of Brereton.

 

We wouldn't have got any cash, instead of Venky's injecting £20m they would have done £8m instead. You'd have just had a few less players.

A normal club you'd be correct, with usit doesn't matter, logic goes out the window.

If you look at Brentford, so long as they made a profit each player was sold once an offer was made and cash reinvested and I hope this is what we start happening. We used to do this all the time under the trust but the comments used to be why are we selling and not keeping the player etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.