Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rovers: Kaminski, Brittain, Ayala, S Wharton, Pickering, Travis, Buckley, Gallagher, Hedges, Brereton, Vale

Subs: Pears, Barnes, Edun, A Wharton, Markanday, Dack, Dolan

Posted
2 minutes ago, TruRover said:

Very attacking! I like it

Carter injured .

Already making us look very light at CB with just one out.

Still, looks a good side.

5-0

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, davulsukur said:

Huge call starting Vale and Hedges tbh. I didn't see Hedges as the type that fitted with the high press, high energy/intensity game plan? 

Dunno he’s nippy and runs his bollocks off

  • Like 1
Posted

Fecking Gallagher on the wing again. Further evidence that Waggott is spiking the coaching and managerial team with LSD. I just can’t see any other rational explanation for why we keep playing him on the wing. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, davulsukur said:

Huge call starting Vale and Hedges tbh. I didn't see Hedges as the type that fitted with the high press, high energy/intensity game plan? 

Hedges played more than anyone during pre-season so I think JDT must fancy him

Posted
1 minute ago, J*B said:

Fecking Gallagher on the wing again. Further evidence that Waggott is spiking the coaching and managerial team with LSD. I just can’t see any other rationale explanation for why we keep playing him on the wing. 

Isnt it heghes right diaz left and gallagher through the mid?

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, J*B said:

Fecking Gallagher on the wing again. Further evidence that Waggott is spiking the coaching and managerial team with LSD. I just can’t see any other rationale explanation for why we keep playing him on the wing. 

Unless he's no on the wing. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, TonyM said:

That's what I expect.....

Very attacking lineup - like it.

Where’s Vale playing?

Posted
Just now, SuperBrfc said:

Looking quite blunt upfront. Can't see us scoring today. Going for a 0-0.

Looking at that side it’s more likely to be 3-3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.