joey_big_nose Posted September 20, 2022 Posted September 20, 2022 1 hour ago, Tugayisgod said: Surely Ayala has to play? Replace him for Carter who drops to the bench and that’s the team I’d go with as well Love Ayala defending the box, but not a fan of his passing or lack of pace. I think it leads to us being very deep that creates a lot of other issues Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Upside Down Posted September 20, 2022 Author Posted September 20, 2022 Definitely need to be 3 in midfield. 2 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted September 20, 2022 Posted September 20, 2022 9 hours ago, booth said: Pickering. I rate him and I think he is good player Quote
WacoRover Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 As a relative newcomer to English footie, I’m guessing we don’t have the midfielders to play a 4-4-2? Quote
rigger Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 43 minutes ago, WacoRover said: As a relative newcomer to English footie, I’m guessing we don’t have the midfielders to play a 4-4-2? 43 minutes ago, WacoRover said: As a relative newcomer to English footie, I’m guessing we don’t have the midfielders to play a 4-4-2? It depends if you are playing midfielders or wingers. Or a combination of both. 1 Quote
joey_big_nose Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 4 hours ago, WacoRover said: As a relative newcomer to English footie, I’m guessing we don’t have the midfielders to play a 4-4-2? Very few teams play 442 sadly. Gets picked off in different ways by other formations. Just watching the England Italy game where it's devolved into a three at the back stalemate, and as interesting and sensible as the tactical game is, you do miss the 90s when virtually everybody would play 442 and play relentlessly end to end. 1 Quote
Mattyblue Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 ‘Interesting and sensible’, just what you want from your day out at a match. 4 Quote
Upside Down Posted September 23, 2022 Author Posted September 23, 2022 I miss the cavalier approach of the 90s. Far more entertaining and exciting than "a well organised press" Remember when players used to take each other on? 4 Quote
SuperBrfc Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 19 minutes ago, Upside Down said: I miss the cavalier approach of the 90s. Far more entertaining and exciting than "a well organised press" Remember when players used to take each other on? I remember the shouts of "skin him" from the Riverside whenever Gillespie was on the ball and facing the full back. More often than not, he would attempt to do exactly that, by trying to beat the defender on the outside and getting a cross in. We're lucky we saw some of the best wingers. Ripley, Wilcox, Duff, Gillespie, Bentley. The latter didn't need much space to whip a quality ball in. Exciting times and proper football. Ryan Giles on the right wing cutting in like Mahrez, anybody? Gally on the right wing? Not the fault of either of those two players, but some people in football today have lost the plot. 7 Quote
Upside Down Posted September 24, 2022 Author Posted September 24, 2022 Proper wingers. Not like this inverted wide forward bollocks. 1 Quote
Mattyblue Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 Won’t somebody think about the xG! 1 Quote
RoversTilliDie Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 We've got to make it fortress Ewood, and win our home games and start picking up points on the road. 3-0 Rovers. 1 Quote
Guest Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 Going to this with a colleague from Chile - would be a good time for BBD to break his goal drought, perhaps with one of those curling efforts from outside the box nestling sweetly in the top corner, eh? Like every other game in this division, it is painfully obvious to the outsider how Rovers should set up. As long as we don't do that infuriating tippy-tappy playing out from the back through Ayala, our defence should be reasonably robust, and we know we can nip a goal here or there. Going for a nervy 2-1 win on this one. If we set up right and get the tactics spot on we may get another footballing masterclass. Trouble is, I don't think we have worked out how to do either of those things reliably at this point, so another afternoon of oohs, ahs and FFS! in store, methinks. COYB! Quote
WacoRover Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 1 hour ago, Shirley Crabtree Wrestler said: Going to this with a colleague from Chile - would be a good time for BBD to break his goal drought, perhaps with one of those curling efforts from outside the box nestling sweetly in the top corner, eh? Like every other game in this division, it is painfully obvious to the outsider how Rovers should set up. As long as we don't do that infuriating tippy-tappy playing out from the back through Ayala, our defence should be reasonably robust, and we know we can nip a goal here or there. Going for a nervy 2-1 win on this one. If we set up right and get the tactics spot on we may get another footballing masterclass. Trouble is, I don't think we have worked out how to do either of those things reliably at this point, so another afternoon of oohs, ahs and FFS! in store, methinks. COYB! BB-D needs to start increasing his goal tally, otherwise, we will be wishing we had the £12 mil offered. Sadly, another player we lose, without getting anything in return. I will go with SCW’s score; I will say Gally with the winner, 2-1, good guys. Quote
Popular Post rigger Posted September 24, 2022 Popular Post Posted September 24, 2022 When I lived in Essex, I knew a Millwall fan. He told me of a chant the Millwall fans sang at the Walsall fans. It went : Three Ls, you've only got three Ls. 10 Quote
Upside Down Posted September 24, 2022 Author Posted September 24, 2022 4 hours ago, rigger said: When I lived in Essex, I knew a Millwall fan. He told me of a chant the Millwall fans sang at the Walsall fans. It went : Three Ls, you've only got three Ls. Pure fucking genius. 3 Quote
rigger Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 28 minutes ago, Upside Down said: Pure fucking genius. Have a look at how this threads title, is spelt. 1 Quote
Upside Down Posted September 24, 2022 Author Posted September 24, 2022 20 minutes ago, rigger said: Have a look at how this threads title, is spelt. I see what you mean. From Wikipedia: Spelt (Triticum spelta), also known as dinkel wheat[2]or hulled wheat,[2] is a species of wheat that has been cultivated since approximately 5000 BC. 1 Quote
Upside Down Posted September 24, 2022 Author Posted September 24, 2022 (edited) @Herbie6590 @J*B @K-Hodand any of the other mods, can the thread title be changed to rectify my egregious spelling error? Edit: Scratch that, I've got it sussed now. It's still a bit early in the morning for me here. Edited September 24, 2022 by Upside Down Quote
Oldgregg86 Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 4 minutes ago, Upside Down said: I see what you mean. From Wikipedia: Spelt (Triticum spelta), also known as dinkel wheat[2]or hulled wheat,[2] is a species of wheat that has been cultivated since approximately 5000 BC. I’ve not half learned some random things from this sight over the years 😂 Quote
rigger Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 6 minutes ago, Upside Down said: I see what you mean. From Wikipedia: Spelt (Triticum spelta), also known as dinkel wheat[2]or hulled wheat,[2] is a species of wheat that has been cultivated since approximately 5000 BC. Spelt - Spelled in a Lancashire accent. 2 Quote
RoversTilliDie Posted September 26, 2022 Posted September 26, 2022 On 24/09/2022 at 12:38, Shirley Crabtree Wrestler said: Going to this with a colleague from Chile - would be a good time for BBD to break his goal drought, perhaps with one of those curling efforts from outside the box nestling sweetly in the top corner, eh? Like every other game in this division, it is painfully obvious to the outsider how Rovers should set up. As long as we don't do that infuriating tippy-tappy playing out from the back through Ayala, our defence should be reasonably robust, and we know we can nip a goal here or there. Going for a nervy 2-1 win on this one. If we set up right and get the tactics spot on we may get another footballing masterclass. Trouble is, I don't think we have worked out how to do either of those things reliably at this point, so another afternoon of oohs, ahs and FFS! in store, methinks. COYB! Agree with the tippy tappy at the back, Kaminski has a habit of playing around with the ball, then rolling it out to a defender with the opposition steaming down on him, then its a nervous minute or two before its cleared.A big boot up field gives Rovers more advantage. Quote
JohnD Posted September 26, 2022 Posted September 26, 2022 A big boot up field only results in another attack to defend because we don't win headers and can't hold the ball up 3 Quote
rigger Posted September 26, 2022 Posted September 26, 2022 20 minutes ago, JohnD said: A big boot up field only results in another attack to defend because we don't win headers and can't hold the ball up At least the attack would be starting in the oppositions half, rather than on the edge of our box 1 Quote
tomphil Posted September 26, 2022 Posted September 26, 2022 1 hour ago, JohnD said: A big boot up field only results in another attack to defend because we don't win headers and can't hold the ball up Shore up the middle and add a bit of muscle and it would limit them strolling back through us. We need a Bradley Johnson type again from somewhere who has a bit left in his legs imo 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.