Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, rovers11 said:

That's more like it! Cook and O'Brien through the door. A striker too please. 

They're not through the door though, as far as we know.

I thought the LT deadlined day feed summary at the top was interesting...says a striker is our top priority, but the only two players it mentions are a defender and a midfielder. Sounds about right.

O'Brien would be an excellent signing though. Shame it's just a loan but a buy is unaffordable without promotion. I just don't think it's much use if we aren't going to sign a striker too. If we don't get promoted, no use paying high wages and possibly fees to borrow him and Thomas when we have a low budget and are meant to be building for the future.

Edited by bluebruce
Posted

More fool Nottingham Forest for thinking they're possibly getting £10m in the summer! 🤣

Maybe we should try and loan more players offering to pay £100m if we win the UCL, FA Cup and Premier League in the next half decade.

Forest singing 38 players is finally catching up to them... praying they go down.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, CD_93 said:

West Brom unable to match OUR package?

 

The difference is baggies might go up and are out of pocket by £10m. Unless we sign a striker too we won't need the £10m

Posted
2 minutes ago, islander200 said:

Thomas , O' Brian, Cook and a striker would be a fantastic window 

A decent striker added to that and I'll send Broughton a case of red.

  • Like 6
Posted
2 minutes ago, islander200 said:

Thomas , O' Brian, Cook and a striker would be a fantastic window 

It would be very impressive but I'm not hopeful we'll get all that done.

It sounded like we only had enough wages to cover 1 incoming after Hirst left?

Posted

I can’t for the life of me work out why we’d spend a penny on a centre back when we are so desperate for a number 9. 

  • Like 5
Posted
44 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

They haven't had the courage to announce BBD's pre contract agreement yet assuming it's genuine. Allegedly trying to water it down by announcing it alongside another signing. 

Sky announced re BBD

Posted
9 minutes ago, davulsukur said:

It would be very impressive but I'm not hopeful we'll get all that done.

It sounded like we only had enough wages to cover 1 incoming after Hirst left?

In fairness that came from one poster.

We have already signed Thomas and on the verge with O'Brien.

O'Brien alone will be costing us more than 10k per week

Posted

Brereton-Diaz, Sorba, Dack and O'Brien (Even JRC 🤣) offering better service would make me okay if it was Gallagher as the starting #9. He could easily score 10+ goals going forward playing with a proper winger, an inform Dack, +O'Brien.

Just please no Dack as the "False 9" to accommodate O'Brien. 

We know Gallagher is completely out of form, but I think every person on this thread would have 5+ goals at Man City this season if replaced with Haaland. We're (in essence) taking the two most creative (best) players from a team last year that arguably should be in the EPL already if not for some terrible Ref/VAR decisions in the Playoff Final last year.

Travis, Dolan, Hedges, Vale, Buckley, Garrett, Morton just aren't creative enough consistently. And now they're role players.

Posted
2 minutes ago, J*B said:

I can’t for the life of me work out why we’d spend a penny on a centre back when we are so desperate for a number 9. 

Because Wharton is currently unreliable and Ayala is due his couple of winter months off. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, islander200 said:

In fairness that came from one poster.

We have already signed Thomas and on the verge with O'Brien.

O'Brien alone will be costing us more than 10k per week

Ah ok, thought it came from JDT. My bad.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.