23/24 kit; is a new sponsor needed?

[Oldgregg86]

I love that. Might buy that instead of the home shirt 

[Herbie6590]

6 hours ago, alex l said:

Keeper top. Any chance this was mistaken for the away kit given the description we've had.

Thought exactly the same..all yellow is alt keeper kit as well 😆

 

https://twitter.com/brfcsdotcom/status/1677773437899612160?s=61&t=YzghmFC1hBTxrcVJBu1kGQ

[Upside Down]

Don't like the home shirt.

The halves not being reversed is really shit. Its yet another simple easy thing that this club fails to get right.

[BankEnd Rover]

I must admit, the home shirt is growing on me, because at first I really didn’t like it….

[Mattyblue]

You can’t see the odd ‘Cambridge blue’ bit of collar when they are on the pitch, so all good.

[alex l]

For those who thought/think our shirts went on sale too late, Chelsea won't have any for sale until mid August.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66152580

[Iceman]

On 07/07/2023 at 15:14, Herbie6590 said:

 

Bingo

[Brainfreeze]

MPs criticise Blackburn Rovers vaping sponsorship deal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-66183944

Edited July 13, 2023 by Brainfreeze

[alex l]

Don't disagree with them but they could easily put legislation in place to stop it. And we can go over the same arguments about advertising for gambling, alcohol etc etc

[Dreams of 1995]

25 minutes ago, Brainfreeze said:

MPs criticise Blackburn Rovers vaping sponsorship deal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-66183944

Good

Maybe that will make our used car salesman think again. Bad press is never good. It really has spoken for the character of the man. A soulless money grabber who doesn’t give a damn about the reputation of the club at all 

I find it a crying shame. I think the Macron kits have been the best we’ve had in a while and they have been ruined with that shite logo 

[arbitro]

Accrington are once against giving every Year 3 kid in Hyndburn a new Stanley shirt. It is the seventh year of doing this and they expect to give around 8400 away.

https://www.accringtonstanley.co.uk/news/2023/july/community-stanleys-big-shirt-giveaway-to-return-for-seventh-year/

[Mattyblue]

Hyndburn has been a Rovers stronghold since time immemorial, but with Stanley now a perennial league outfit (plus being a far more proactive club than this one) and the Dingles spending a lot of time in the Premier League, I’d be interested in the views of residents to how our support is holding up there?

[chaddyrovers]

6 hours ago, Brainfreeze said:

MPs criticise Blackburn Rovers vaping sponsorship deal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-66183944

Rovers and totally wicked defend the partnership 

https://c.newsnow.co.uk/A/1188297382?-11198:839

5 hours ago, arbitro said:

Accrington are once against giving every Year 3 kid in Hyndburn a new Stanley shirt. It is the seventh year of doing this and they expect to give around 8400 away.

https://www.accringtonstanley.co.uk/news/2023/july/community-stanleys-big-shirt-giveaway-to-return-for-seventh-year/

I don't know why Rovers don't do similar tbh and with Hyndburn, Ribble Valley and etc which have Rovers fans within those areas

[martonrover]

13 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Rovers and totally wicked defend the partnership 

Well, of course, they would do.

I'm so glad they've been called out for it.

Waggott clearly has no moral compass.

It's so obviously inappropriate for any sports club to be seen endorsing a nicotine based product.

[Guest]

7 hours ago, Dreams of 1995 said:

Maybe that will make our used car salesman think again.

It will be forgotten about next summer when the club changes its front of shirt sponsor.

Funny... We've had this sponsor for our training-wear for several years, and front of shirt sponsor this year. Why are these MPs only just getting around to criticising it? I feel like it's yet another bunch of MPs wanting to be seen to be moral.

[Upside Down]

2 minutes ago, goozburger said:

It will be forgotten about next summer when the club changes its front of shirt sponsor.

Funny... We've had this sponsor for our training-wear for several years, and front of shirt sponsor this year. Why are these MPs only just getting around to criticising it? I feel like it's yet another bunch of MPs wanting to be seen to be moral.

As alex I said, if they wanted to do something about it they would. 

With all the hand wringing about nicotine, you'd think they'd just ban it. But once again we see no action taken. 

Strange how it didn't take them long to ban MDMA and other such substances. 

[Mattyblue]

Why more of a fuss now? I’d say largely because of all the stories emerging from schools re those ‘elf bars’ and the like over the past few months.

[Upside Down]

1 minute ago, Mattyblue said:

Why more of a fuss now? I’d say largely because of all the stories emerging from schools re those ‘elf bars’ and the like over the past few months.

What on earth is an elf bar?

[Mattyblue]

Garishly colourful vapes quite obviously aimed at kids through ‘influencers’ on TikTok and the like - ergo now absolutely rife in schools.

[Exiled_Rover]

8 hours ago, arbitro said:

Accrington are once against giving every Year 3 kid in Hyndburn a new Stanley shirt. It is the seventh year of doing this and they expect to give around 8400 away.

https://www.accringtonstanley.co.uk/news/2023/july/community-stanleys-big-shirt-giveaway-to-return-for-seventh-year/

Poor sods. 

[Sweaty Gussets]

1 hour ago, goozburger said:

It will be forgotten about next summer when the club changes its front of shirt sponsor.

Funny... We've had this sponsor for our training-wear for several years, and front of shirt sponsor this year. Why are these MPs only just getting around to criticising it? I feel like it's yet another bunch of MPs wanting to be seen to be moral.

Because of increasing evidence it is harming kids. They have a moral duty to speak out. 

[Guest]

10 minutes ago, Sweaty Gussets said:

Because of increasing evidence it is harming kids. They have a moral duty to speak out. 

I'm more interested in the moral duty to do something. Everybody "speaks out". It's easy. The hard part is doing something, which most can't be bothered with.

[Sweaty Gussets]

52 minutes ago, goozburger said:

I'm more interested in the moral duty to do something. Everybody "speaks out". It's easy. The hard part is doing something, which most can't be bothered with.

You asked why they have becoming increasingly vocal. 

Agreed on your follow-up point, they'll do frig all unless it benefits them. 

[Upside Down]

They won't do anything at all. It would hurt the wallets of their friends in the tobacco industry. 

[Tom]

21 hours ago, Brainfreeze said:

MPs criticise Blackburn Rovers vaping sponsorship deal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-66183944

IMG_6239.webp