Venky’s v Indian Government (a) - 25/3/2025 - Perennially Re-Arranged Challenge Match

[TheRevAshton]

5 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

It's all virtually irrelevant to the football club at this stage I think. If they want to fund us they can. But as Paul Mani said they don't like the idea of being personally on the hook for it.

Whether or not the Court case materially affects other areas of their business I've no idea.

I wouldn't say so. True, they can fund us - but they seemingly don't want to with the current obstacles in place.

My hope is that they fail with the case, and then come to the realisation that it's completely unsustainable having to fund the Club via the current method (having to match every £ sent with a bond).

Edited January 13 by TheRevAshton

[RevidgeBlue]

9 minutes ago, TheRevAshton said:

 it's completely unsustainable having to fund the Club via the current method (having to match every £ sent with a bond).

Don't think they do have to, that's the point.

They have to provide a guarantee which presumably doesn't cost them anything as long as they stick to the rules but makes them personally liable if they  send money somewhere they shouldn't again in future.

[rigger]

Wouldn't it be great if the club came out and told us the truth of what the owners can or can't do.

[wilsdenrover]

11 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Don't think they do have to, that's the point.

They have to provide a guarantee which presumably doesn't cost them anything as long as they stick to the rules but makes them personally liable if they  send money somewhere they shouldn't again in future.

As you say, it doesn’t cost them a penny as long as they stick to the rules.

What it does do is reduce the cash/borrowing facilities they can use for other matters.

[wilsdenrover]

Court is still sitting, waiting to catch what number case they are up to.

[TheRevAshton]

2 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Court is still sitting, waiting to catch what number case they are up to.

Which number are they? Are they still in with that Sanjeev chap?

[wilsdenrover]

Just now, TheRevAshton said:

Which number are they? Are they still in with that Sanjeev chap?

Court number 8 - different judge - Sachin Datta 

[wilsdenrover]

A solicitor has just accused the court of being political.

It’s properly kicking off lol

No idea what the case is.

[KentExile]

1 minute ago, wilsdenrover said:

A solicitor has just accused the court of being political.

It’s properly kicking off lol

No idea what the case is.

Almost certainly that is ours then , lol

[wilsdenrover]

They’re on case number 25 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[RevidgeBlue]

3 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

They’re on case number 25 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

You're having a fun morning!

What number are we? 60?

And what time is it there? Nailed on for another adjournment?

[wilsdenrover]

2 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

You're having a fun morning!

What number are we? 60?

And what time is it there? Nailed on for another adjournment?

I’ve nothing else to do lol

It’s 16:30 in Delhi…

[wilsdenrover]

Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March.

One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which.

Edited January 13 by wilsdenrover

[KentExile]

1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said:

Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March.

One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which.

It never ends, and never will.

I imagine that the lack of meaningful acquisitions and/or extra sales in the January window will now have the excuse of "unforeseen complications" in India

Edited January 13 by KentExile

[davulsukur]

14 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March.

One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which.

Might as well just adjourn it indefinitely. It's never going to end.

[wilsdenrover]

5 minutes ago, KentExile said:

It never ends, and never will

There was one case in this court today which began in 2012…

[KentExile]

2 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

There was one case in this court today which began in 2012…

ffs, lol

[wilsdenrover]

9 minutes ago, KentExile said:

It never ends, and never will.

I imagine that the lack of meaningful acquisitions (or extra sales) in the January window will now have the excuse of "unforeseen complications" in India

But but but…

[chaddyrovers]

17 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March.

One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which.

It sounds like Indian court system is a mess and I wonder how many court cases are they in the system? 

[wilsdenrover]

I imagine plenty of people will remember FA cup matches going to fourth replays.

This ongoing saga puts that to shame.

[wilsdenrover]

7 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

It sounds like Indian court system is a mess and I wonder how many court cases are they in the system? 

There are over 1800 cases listed for tomorrow in Delhi alone.

[chaddyrovers]

6 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

There are over 1800 cases listed for tomorrow in Delhi alone.

what??? 

and how many do they get through? maybe 30 a day? 

what a crazy system 

[wilsdenrover]

2 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

what??? 

and how many do they get through? maybe 30 a day? 

what a crazy system 

Delhi has more than one court room so they’ll get through more than that 😁

You’re still right about it being crazy though.

[roversfan99]

3 hours ago, TheRevAshton said:

I wouldn't say so. True, they can fund us - but they seemingly don't want to with the current obstacles in place.

My hope is that they fail with the case, and then come to the realisation that it's completely unsustainable having to fund the Club via the current method (having to match every £ sent with a bond).

They dont want to full stop. They hadnt been in the years prior.

[Herbie6590]