TheRevAshton Posted January 13 Posted January 13 (edited) 5 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: It's all virtually irrelevant to the football club at this stage I think. If they want to fund us they can. But as Paul Mani said they don't like the idea of being personally on the hook for it. Whether or not the Court case materially affects other areas of their business I've no idea. I wouldn't say so. True, they can fund us - but they seemingly don't want to with the current obstacles in place. My hope is that they fail with the case, and then come to the realisation that it's completely unsustainable having to fund the Club via the current method (having to match every £ sent with a bond). Edited January 13 by TheRevAshton Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
RevidgeBlue Posted January 13 Posted January 13 9 minutes ago, TheRevAshton said: it's completely unsustainable having to fund the Club via the current method (having to match every £ sent with a bond). Don't think they do have to, that's the point. They have to provide a guarantee which presumably doesn't cost them anything as long as they stick to the rules but makes them personally liable if they send money somewhere they shouldn't again in future. Quote
rigger Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Wouldn't it be great if the club came out and told us the truth of what the owners can or can't do. 2 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 11 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: Don't think they do have to, that's the point. They have to provide a guarantee which presumably doesn't cost them anything as long as they stick to the rules but makes them personally liable if they send money somewhere they shouldn't again in future. As you say, it doesn’t cost them a penny as long as they stick to the rules. What it does do is reduce the cash/borrowing facilities they can use for other matters. 2 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Court is still sitting, waiting to catch what number case they are up to. 1 Quote
TheRevAshton Posted January 13 Posted January 13 2 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Court is still sitting, waiting to catch what number case they are up to. Which number are they? Are they still in with that Sanjeev chap? Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Just now, TheRevAshton said: Which number are they? Are they still in with that Sanjeev chap? Court number 8 - different judge - Sachin Datta 1 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 A solicitor has just accused the court of being political. It’s properly kicking off lol No idea what the case is. 1 Quote
KentExile Posted January 13 Posted January 13 1 minute ago, wilsdenrover said: A solicitor has just accused the court of being political. It’s properly kicking off lol No idea what the case is. Almost certainly that is ours then , lol 1 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted January 13 Posted January 13 3 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: They’re on case number 25 🤦♂️🤦♂️ You're having a fun morning! What number are we? 60? And what time is it there? Nailed on for another adjournment? Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 2 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: You're having a fun morning! What number are we? 60? And what time is it there? Nailed on for another adjournment? I’ve nothing else to do lol It’s 16:30 in Delhi… Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 (edited) Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March. One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which. Edited January 13 by wilsdenrover Quote
KentExile Posted January 13 Posted January 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said: Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March. One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which. It never ends, and never will. I imagine that the lack of meaningful acquisitions and/or extra sales in the January window will now have the excuse of "unforeseen complications" in India Edited January 13 by KentExile 5 Quote
davulsukur Posted January 13 Posted January 13 14 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March. One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which. Might as well just adjourn it indefinitely. It's never going to end. 6 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 5 minutes ago, KentExile said: It never ends, and never will There was one case in this court today which began in 2012… 3 Quote
KentExile Posted January 13 Posted January 13 2 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: There was one case in this court today which began in 2012… ffs, lol 1 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 9 minutes ago, KentExile said: It never ends, and never will. I imagine that the lack of meaningful acquisitions (or extra sales) in the January window will now have the excuse of "unforeseen complications" in India But but but… 4 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted January 13 Posted January 13 17 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Case adjourned until (I think) 25th March. One side was pushing for an earlier date, not sure which. It sounds like Indian court system is a mess and I wonder how many court cases are they in the system? 1 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 I imagine plenty of people will remember FA cup matches going to fourth replays. This ongoing saga puts that to shame. 2 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: It sounds like Indian court system is a mess and I wonder how many court cases are they in the system? There are over 1800 cases listed for tomorrow in Delhi alone. Quote
chaddyrovers Posted January 13 Posted January 13 6 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: There are over 1800 cases listed for tomorrow in Delhi alone. what??? and how many do they get through? maybe 30 a day? what a crazy system Quote
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Posted January 13 2 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: what??? and how many do they get through? maybe 30 a day? what a crazy system Delhi has more than one court room so they’ll get through more than that 😁 You’re still right about it being crazy though. Quote
roversfan99 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 3 hours ago, TheRevAshton said: I wouldn't say so. True, they can fund us - but they seemingly don't want to with the current obstacles in place. My hope is that they fail with the case, and then come to the realisation that it's completely unsustainable having to fund the Club via the current method (having to match every £ sent with a bond). They dont want to full stop. They hadnt been in the years prior. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.