Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, philipl said:

They bought Rovers because of Balaji's relationship with Jerome Anderson and the other family members accepted the pitch without doing enough homework. 

A business that size which is serious about global reach wouldn't be so zero committed

 

In one of her first interviews the woman Venky talked about spending £5m per window and 'leasing' players. Deary me the Walker Trust were spending more than that. They have never been committed, to them we were a vanity project that now hangs like an albatross around their grubby necks.

And still they won't sell us.

  • Like 8
Posted
1 hour ago, tomphil said:

A vanity project that just happened to have global exposure for their massive business expansion plans.

Brought about by con artists, snakes and serpents fortunate enough to have access to the most gullible pot of gold in football history.

Crazy thing is had it worked and had the right people been involved it could have been fantastic for the club but sadly everybody involved were looking at what THEY had to gain, not the club.

Walkers and those at the club selling it 100% included in that !

It was easy money for them, why actually work at the job when you don’t have to ?

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

And still they walk among us (from comments on BBC match report)…

IMG_1360.thumb.jpeg.efc37caab2d4e7d6572a3f29d222ab2b.jpeg

Absolute fucking retards.

Total fucking embarrassment to the club and the those of who have the capacity to think.

I've encountered amoeba with more brain power than these morons.

Edited by Upside Down
  • Like 5
Posted

They seem fairly representative of the fanbase (away from brfcs, of course).

They have never been as popular as they are at the moment, can’t remember the last time I heard a dissenting voice towards them at Ewood.

Posted
5 hours ago, Mattyblue said:

They seem fairly representative of the fanbase (away from brfcs, of course).

They have never been as popular as they are at the moment, can’t remember the last time I heard a dissenting voice towards them at Ewood.

Well that's just disgustful.

Posted (edited)

Lol.

No, not disgustful, disgracing 🤣 

Edited by Shirley Crabtree Wrestler
Pedantic overweight AND an aresehole. I'm baaaad
Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

That isn’t the holding company, it’s the one which owns the training ground.

That’s correct, that’s the company that owns the training ground, probably the final portion of the payment due to the club for the sale of the training ground.

However, does this then mean that the restrictions on Venkys sending money to overseas group companies have been lifted? It would appear so.

Edited by Brian-Potter
  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brian-Potter said:

That’s correct, that’s the company that owns the training ground, probably the final portion of the payment due to the club for the sale of the training ground.

However, does this then mean that the restrictions on Venkys sending money to overseas group companies have been lifted? It would appear so.

It may well just be money that was sent a while ago being turned into equity.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said:

That isn’t the holding company, it’s the one which owns the training ground.

The finance expert makes that mistake every time.

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

That isn’t the holding company, it’s the one which owns the training ground.

Could be the money from the venture capitalist loan

  • Like 2
Posted
On 27/10/2023 at 08:58, arbitro said:

In one of her first interviews the woman Venky talked about spending £5m per window and 'leasing' players. Deary me the Walker Trust were spending more than that. They have never been committed, to them we were a vanity project that now hangs like an albatross around their grubby necks.

And still they won't sell us.

We should have pulled the plug on the deal as soon as they started talking about what Rovers could do for the Venkys brand instead of the other way around. It was clear fromt the start, as you say, that the club was only bought to bolster the image of the owner. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, rickard said:

We should have pulled the plug on the deal as soon as they started talking about what Rovers could do for the Venkys brand instead of the other way around. It was clear fromt the start, as you say, that the club was only bought to bolster the image of the owner. 

Sadly Jack's family wanted the moolah and couldn't get their hands on the Rupees quick enough.

  • Like 8
Posted
14 hours ago, Rogerb said:

Could be the money from the venture capitalist loan

Venture capitalists typically take equity stakes themselves so they can have a say in how the business is operated, as opposed to lending money to the current owners for them to issue more shares. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.