Paul Mani Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 Absolutely gutted for Sam Barnes. He was the best defender we had in the preseason that JDT joined. Not sure what’s happened for him to end up leaving… I see Mcfadz AND Fleck are in contractual discussions too…😬 2 Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
simongarnerisgod Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 1 minute ago, davulsukur said: Retained list: https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2024/may/18/retain-list-confirmed/ Confirms we have taken the 1 year option on Gally and Dolan (sigh) and we are in discussions with Fadz and Fleck (why the fuck would we be?) Also, thought Charlie Weston was highly rated? another year of gallagher😒feel sorry for sam barnes,he was very highly rated at one time but has had a terrible time with injuries,have no idea why we are negotiating with fleck,he`s now broken his leg 3 times in 3 seasons,obviously that is`nt an issue with the spanners who run the club Quote
lraC Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 4 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Agreement with who? It can’t be with the court, as that was adjourned. Waggott stated that a precedent had been set and he therefore expected permission to be granted at the meeting in February. If the court have agreed that they can now send that money that why is it reported that it was adjourned. Surely the meeting would have had to have taken place for a decision like that to have been made. 1 Quote
roversfan99 Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 Why are we in talks with John Fleck? He has a plate in his leg and has barely played any football in years. We took a stupid risk last time, got a kick after 17 minutes, didnt play again yet we dont learn from our mistakes. 5 Quote
Forever Blue Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 4 minutes ago, davulsukur said: Retained list: https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2024/may/18/retain-list-confirmed/ Confirms we have taken the 1 year option on Gally and Dolan (sigh) and we are in discussions with Fadz and Fleck (why the fuck would we be?) Also, thought Charlie Weston was highly rated? Surprised Cirino and Fyles have also been released. I thought they were highly rated too. Quote
Dreams of 1995 Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 Really bloody annoying how frequently we make mistakes in our club correspondence Have we ever had a player called Jay Haddock? Steve Wagott oversees such as an amateur operation. Have some respect. He does not deserve his wage 5 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 (edited) 3 minutes ago, lraC said: It can’t be with the court, as that was adjourned. Waggott stated that a precedent had been set and he therefore expected permission to be granted at the meeting in February. If the court have agreed that they can now send that money that why is it reported that it was adjourned. Surely the meeting would have had to have taken place for a decision like that to have been made. The only other option would be an agreement with the Directorate Of Enforcement but if that was the case we wouldn’t have been fed the ‘technical and procedural issues’ line. Edited May 18, 2024 by wilsdenrover 2 Quote
Popular Post davulsukur Posted May 18, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 18, 2024 Just now, Paul Mani said: Absolutely gutted for Sam Barnes. He was the best defender we had in the preseason that JDT joined. Not sure what’s happened for him to end up leaving… I see Mcfadz AND Fleck are in contractual discussions too…😬 Being in discussions with Fadz and Fleck pretty.much confirms we have 0 budget to play with. As good as Fadz was, he was a short term sticking plaster and we won't move on if we are retaining players of his age. Signing Fleck back up is beyond barrell scraping and comfortably one of the biggest waste of wages/budget we could do. 11 Quote
lraC Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 5 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: I think it’s beyond obvious that Adam was sold because the case was adjourned. Yeah and the owners cannot find the running costs just now. 2 Quote
Devon Rover Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 Jay Haddock. Is there anything administrative that this club can get right?! Quote
Forever Blue Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 2 minutes ago, Dreams of 1995 said: Really bloody annoying how frequently we make mistakes in our club correspondence Have we ever had a player called Jay Haddock? Steve Wagott oversees such as an amateur operation. Have some respect. He does not deserve his wage Something fishy going on. It says Haddow now. 1 Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 giving gallagher another year is basically saying,we ar`nt buying another striker as this one is sufficient to achieve our aims,ffs put the house,car and the savings on us getting relegated,especially is sammie is sold 2 Quote
lraC Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 4 minutes ago, Devon Rover said: Jay Haddock. Is there anything administrative that this club can get right?! I’m getting a haddock, trying to keep up with all the lies and errors. Quote
lraC Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 Just now, simongarnerisgod said: giving gallagher another year is basically saying,we ar`nt buying another striker as this one is sufficient to achieve our aims,ffs put the house,car and the savings on us getting relegated,especially is sammie is sold It could be a tactic to allow us to sell him, instead of him walking for nothing, like Brereton and others. 2 Quote
arbitro Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 I'm really surprised Saadi has been offered a new deal. He is 22 and has spent time in loan at the likes of Marine. If he accepts I think he will be on peanuts but given our financial situation I think it's money wasted. Isaac Whitehall has been offered a new deal but I think he has something to offer despite spending nigh on two seasons injured. Similarly Alex Baker has been out injured for a long time and like Whitehall is clearly being offered a deal to prove his fitness. In light of these two I really don't understand letting Sam Barnes go. Surely he too should be given a chance to prove his fitness. Frankly I'm amazed that Fleck has been offered a deal. Quote
Forever Blue Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 9 minutes ago, lraC said: It can’t be with the court, as that was adjourned. Waggott stated that a precedent had been set and he therefore expected permission to be granted at the meeting in February. If the court have agreed that they can now send that money that why is it reported that it was adjourned. Surely the meeting would have had to have taken place for a decision like that to have been made. The meeting did take place in March and was promptly adjourned until August. Rovers then released a statement that as a result of that meeting that there remained only ‘technical and procedural’ matters remaining that ‘should’ have no impact on the funding of Rovers going forward. people can choose what to believe Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 3 minutes ago, lraC said: It could be a tactic to allow us to sell him, instead of him walking for nothing, like Brereton and others. gally is`nt worth anything like what brereton was worth before we let him walk away,we`ll be lucky to get half a million for him Quote
Backroom Popular Post Tom Posted May 18, 2024 Backroom Popular Post Posted May 18, 2024 Offering Fleck a deal is insulting to everyone, he’s been paid since January for 17 minutes and was a desperation move even then 17 Quote
davulsukur Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 16 minutes ago, lraC said: It could be a tactic to allow us to sell him, instead of him walking for nothing, like Brereton and others. Or, it's the simplest, cheapest, most convenient solution to a problem, so that's the route our senior management operate. 2 Quote
rigger Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 29 minutes ago, Paul Mani said: Absolutely gutted for Sam Barnes. He was the best defender we had in the preseason that JDT joined. Not sure what’s happened for him to end up leaving… I see Mcfadz AND Fleck are in contractual discussions too…😬 Injuries Quote
BankEnd Rover Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 Don’t doubt fleck would be a good player for us when fit, but contract talks with a player who hasn’t been fit for years is an awful sign…Really not looking forward to this summer/next season. 1 Quote
tomphil Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 34 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Why are we in talks with John Fleck? He has a plate in his leg and has barely played any football in years. We took a stupid risk last time, got a kick after 17 minutes, didnt play again yet we dont learn from our mistakes. I suspect there'll be a nice kick back for someone who gives him another contract 😉 Quote
Exiled_Rover Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 37 minutes ago, davulsukur said: Retained list: https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2024/may/18/retain-list-confirmed/ Confirms we have taken the 1 year option on Gally and Dolan (sigh) and we are in discussions with Fadz and Fleck (why the fuck would we be?) Also, thought Charlie Weston was highly rated? I'd say "I guess he hasn't set the world alight at Kidderminster", but we've sacked our DoF and Waggott is calling the shots now, so who knows. Quote
arbitro Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 15 minutes ago, Tom said: Offering Fleck a deal is insulting to everyone, he’s been paid since January for 17 minutes and was a desperation move even then According to President Nixon there was a clause in his deal which triggered a new contract offer if he played fifteen minutes or more. 😁😁 It is absolutely insane though considering what he has already cost us. 1 Quote
tomphil Posted May 18, 2024 Posted May 18, 2024 38 minutes ago, Forever Blue said: Surprised Cirino and Fyles have also been released. I thought they were highly rated too. Cirino was a willing trier but never going to make it at this level but i expect/hope he'll get fixed up lower down the chain. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.