Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

The Summer Transfer Window (Press Submit)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mercer said:

No one is saying we immediately accept £500k less for SS or pay £400k more for de Lange - it's a negotiation but my goodness it always seems at a snail's pace by Rovers.  Where two parties are minded to do a deal, as they are in these two transfers, then you sit down, hammer it out and get the feckin deal closed.

With SS - clearly, the lad wants to go and almost certainly wont play for us again.  Not only is this unsettling for the lad but for the group as a whole.  He needs to be out the building.

With de Lange, all protracted negotiations do is alert other potential suitors and you risk losing the player.  Who can ever forget us losing Roy Keane to United because Rovers' offices were closed on a Sunday!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Snooze and you lose - it's that simple.

If it was as easy as that all clubs would have transfers done within 24/48 hours. Reality is clubs are businesses and they will penny pinch in every way possible until they find middle ground. Happens in every single club long drawn out transfer sagas isn’t just rovers look at Conor Gallagher transfer for example been on going few weeks now too. It’s football

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mercer said:

No one is saying we immediately accept £500k less for SS or pay £400k more for de Lange - it's a negotiation but my goodness it always seems at a snail's pace by Rovers.  Where two parties are minded to do a deal, as they are in these two transfers, then you sit down, hammer it out and get the feckin deal closed.

With SS - clearly, the lad wants to go and almost certainly wont play for us again.  Not only is this unsettling for the lad but for the group as a whole.  He needs to be out the building.

With de Lange, all protracted negotiations do is alert other potential suitors and you risk losing the player.  Who can ever forget us losing Roy Keane to United because Rovers' offices were closed on a Sunday!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Snooze and you lose - it's that simple.

Honestly, I don’t think we’re any faster or slower than anyone else. The speed of deals comes down to money.

When clubs are flush - they go in, pay the money and take the player. Most times there’s a considerable amount of negotiation behind the scenes. But to put this in context, Palace negotiated for around two weeks on Adam Wharton to do a deal for £18m. A player who was being courted nationally and is now worth 3 or 4x what they paid.

The agreement in principle / interest in JDL wasn’t even broken until this weekend. Let them get on with it…no need to swallow an extra £400k loss on what they want to pay, or bow to Ipswich re SS. It needs sorting but the main thing is that the 5/6 signings made last week means we can now field a decent team on Friday night.

FWIW - I still see the SS and JDL thing being resolved this week.

Edited by Paul Mani
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ricky said:

But it’s the same if we buy a player. It’s no different, we don’t pay the fee all in one go so it’s exactly the same. We could buy a £5m player with the £5m Raya sell on as we wouldn’t pay for that player all in one go. 

But.....the Premier League clubs have so much more money ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Leonard Venkhater said:

Yes.

This is the awful thing about the Raya add-ons...A Premier League club with all its riches, dragging out the payments over several years...

That’s our fault for not insisting it would become payable immediately upon a future sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Craigman said:

So Nixon is suggesting we want guaranteed £9million for SS, with extras to take up to £12million.

If Nixon is correct that's more than reasonable on our part.

It's Ipswich who are tyrekicking and not interested enough to pay a realistic fee imo.

We SHOULD tell them to do one until they're prepared to take negotiations seriously.

But.........

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Torgeir said:

Will probably favour the Blades but seems we have cast a wide net in our search for a new GK. Unless we want two......

Wouldn't be at all surprised if we do want 2 GK's. For all we know JE doesn't rate Pears, but he simply has to play him because Hilton is nowhere near the required ability.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sharpysharps86 said:

Wouldn't be at all surprised if we do want 2 GK's. For all we know JE doesn't rate Pears, but he simply has to play him because Hilton is nowhere near the required ability.

Rushworth wouldn't come on loan to play second fiddle 

The club won't pay a couple of million on Lange to bench him 

Maybe we are looking for 2 keepers,but it wouldn't be both those keepers 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Wing Wizard Windy Miller said:

Till the first howler. 

If we're changing keepers every time they cock up, they're going to be in and out like a fiddler's elbow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

So have we moved on from De Lange for the sake of a few hundred grand to try and borrow someone?

Or we're exploring our options.

The last thing you want to happen is to come to an impasse with De Lange and not have a backup plan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

Or we're exploring our options.

The last thing you want to happen is to come to an impasse with De Lange and not have a backup plan.

I would want a longer term goalkeeper. Wasnt there a second goalkeeper at PSV who we apparently wanted? Not that £1.25m should be beyond us.

Assuming that some of the rumours about goalkeepers this summer have been true, small cash buys, aging freebies, loanees, it doesnt scream of a club with a plan. 

Edited by roversfan99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.