Adam Owen set to become Rovers new head of technical.

[K-Hod]

Fair enough if people think we’ve too many happy clappers or people unwilling to fight.

I trust those making these assertions will be fighting themselves? Otherwise, I reckon those observations are a little hollow tbf.

[roversfan99]

5 hours ago, Mercer said:

Generally, Rovers' fans are a placid lot and our owners, Waggott and Pasha get a very easy ride.

In my more 'militant' days, if it felt change was needed, we were on the pitch, in the enclosure in front of the directors' box (right in their faces) and outside the main entrance on Nuttall Street in vociferous numbers. 

Sadly, we have far too many happy clappers who can't see past their own nose.

Didnt you swerve the last Burnley game due to fear?

[RevidgeBlue]

On 03/06/2024 at 12:33, roversfan99 said:

The house wont fall until the owners are gone.

Your constant desire to defend Waggott and let him off the hook is absolutely baffling.

Edit: He's a scourge on the Club who needs removing yesterday irrespective of whether the current owners remain in charge.

Edited June 6, 2024 by RevidgeBlue

[RevidgeBlue]

As for the appointment of a "Technical Director" I too have no idea what one of those is but like Broughton it smacks of another low quality appointment with a fancy title to appease the fan base and deflect attention away from the fact that the one thing that really matters, the actual transfer budget, most likely consists of thruppence ha'penny and a half eaten Mars Bar.

[roversfan99]

52 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Your constant desire to defend Waggott and let him off the hook is absolutely baffling.

Edit: He's a scourge on the Club who needs removing yesterday irrespective of whether the current owners remain in charge.

Im not letting him off the hook. I repeat consistently that hes a Venkys stooge out of his depth and needs to go.

If despite this, merely saying that our problems wont go until the owners do is defending him then I think thats your warped definition.

[martonrover]

On 03/06/2024 at 14:16, Mattyblue said:

Think people on here fundamentally misunderstand large chunks of the fanbase.

It’s not that they don’t have enough fight to go after the owners - it’s that they don’t have any particular issue with them in the first place.

 

I think that's certainly true of a large percentage of current attendees.

Many of those who had the fight to go after the owners no longer attend. That is the ultimate form of protest.

[Mattyblue]

Exactly, and those lost thousands would worry the powers that be at a normal club far more than a couple of hundred folk at the back of a stand chanting about the CEO… here they couldn’t give a feck about the lost fans, but they didn’t half move quick at purging when Swag got an odd chant aimed at him.

[chaddyrovers]