wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 I’ve posted this in the correct thread too but court case adjourned again (I think I heard 25th March) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Torgeir Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 6 minutes ago, Theaxe15 said: To be fair, Wikipedia isn’t really the font of accurate knowledge I expect you to come up with something more accurate then. "The 32-year-old has had trouble staying fit since joining the Pilgrims from Norwich City in January due to a series of minor issues, which has limited him to eight starts and four substitute appearances. Forshaw lasted only nine minutes of the match against Steven Schumacher's Stoke City at the bet365 Stadium on Saturday before he had to be taken off." https://uk.news.yahoo.com/more-injury-frustration-plymouth-argyle-113007214.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD5mFgSXrGIhcq7jAKEP2h-9iFCboG0ii1kE2iRcT2AdnhhPP_ZPtqN-27wkGpdd1CJmCDp7bu3Njn4A8qNAHefsNGku4JtP5Opq3atedOZNSIty_WABQOez8wEXtYj8eI7ho07md9r1ocQj69NmDA-Dk84zaQLGt2Q0XnAA4i2x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KentExile Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 This same tactic worked for Szmodics too, maybe we should just blow the remaining January budget on peroxide? 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerald Isle Rover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 22 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: Embarrassing the lengths you are going to prove your point. Do you have any evidence what Gestede has publicly to the fans forum isn't the way transfers are done here? and this season he has been fit. Simple As. The past is the past. he has started 7 games, came on as a sub 9 times and unused sub 5 times. not selected 4 times. It’s not lengths chaddy it’s right infront of my eyes this last 14 years and more specifically 3 that we get told one thing and another thing tends to happen or be the case its cool you love and like and believe everything the club does I just disagree and if you don’t like to debate it or be called out on it scroll past 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted January 13 Author Share Posted January 13 Just now, Emerald Isle Rover said: It’s not lengths chaddy it’s right infront of my eyes this last 14 years and more specifically 3 that we get told one thing and another thing tends to happen or be the case its cool you love and like and believe everything the club does I just disagree and if you don’t like to debate it or be called out on it scroll past I asked a simple question Do you have any evidence what Gestede has publicly to the fans forum isn't the way transfers are done here? a simple yes and no will do please? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theaxe15 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 26 minutes ago, Torgeir said: I expect you to come up with something more accurate then. "The 32-year-old has had trouble staying fit since joining the Pilgrims from Norwich City in January due to a series of minor issues, which has limited him to eight starts and four substitute appearances. Forshaw lasted only nine minutes of the match against Steven Schumacher's Stoke City at the bet365 Stadium on Saturday before he had to be taken off." https://uk.news.yahoo.com/more-injury-frustration-plymouth-argyle-113007214.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD5mFgSXrGIhcq7jAKEP2h-9iFCboG0ii1kE2iRcT2AdnhhPP_ZPtqN-27wkGpdd1CJmCDp7bu3Njn4A8qNAHefsNGku4JtP5Opq3atedOZNSIty_WABQOez8wEXtYj8eI7ho07md9r1ocQj69NmDA-Dk84zaQLGt2Q0XnAA4i2x Just saying if you’re gonna slam someone for being a couple of numbers off, which is largely unnecessary anyway, that Wikipedia might not be the best source. That’s all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 14 minutes ago, KentExile said: This same tactic worked for Szmodics too, maybe we should just blow the remaining January budget on peroxide? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post CrouchingNunhiddenCucumber Posted January 13 Popular Post Share Posted January 13 Thos thread should be named "people trying to convince person with chronic confirmation bias that there is an alternative narrative" 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevidgeBlue Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: I asked a simple question Do you have any evidence what Gestede has publicly to the fans forum isn't the way transfers are done here? a simple yes and no will do please? I wonder what happens if Eustace doesn't like any of the names presented to him? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 6 minutes ago, Theaxe15 said: Just saying if you’re gonna slam someone for being a couple of numbers off, which is largely unnecessary anyway, that Wikipedia might not be the best source. That’s all. I hope you’re not suggesting wiki can be fiddled with… 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torgeir Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, Theaxe15 said: Just saying if you’re gonna slam someone for being a couple of numbers off, which is largely unnecessary anyway, that Wikipedia might not be the best source. That’s all. Huh? Do you agree he's injury prone or not? That's the question - not whether wiki is pin-point accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theaxe15 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 5 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: I hope you’re not suggesting wiki can be fiddled with… Love it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torgeir Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 4 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: I hope you’re not suggesting wiki can be fiddled with… Same to you, what's your point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucimo Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 2 hours ago, chaddyrovers said: I would expect Eustace to have suggestions just like every head coach does and will suggested. JDT did, Mowbray did, etc. no-one expected Baker to be recalled but Rovers got a replace in and quick. Good quick management from Gestede and Eustace, Similar with Sanderson which no-one had the inside scoop on and when I saw the notification on my phone when I got to work I was surprised but happy with the signing I wish we would see good quick management bringing in the forward players we've desperately needed all season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Just now, Torgeir said: Same to you, what's your point? I don’t have a point. I’ve just watched two hours of a court in India and it’s put me into a silly mood. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerald Isle Rover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 21 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: I asked a simple question Do you have any evidence what Gestede has publicly to the fans forum isn't the way transfers are done here? a simple yes and no will do please? No do you have any evidence that the process above has taken place yes or no answer please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevidgeBlue Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: No do you have any evidence that the process above has taken place yes or no answer please Can we just summarise all this as chaddy believes that everything the Club says will happen does and you (like 99% of the rest of us) dont? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugayisgod Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Doesn't look like Bamford will happen, thank God https://motleedsnews.com/comment/leeds-united-look-set-to-make-patrick-bamford-mistake-as-exit-stance-shared/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilsdenrover Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 minute ago, Tugayisgod said: Doesn't look like Bamford will happen, thank God https://motleedsnews.com/comment/leeds-united-look-set-to-make-patrick-bamford-mistake-as-exit-stance-shared/ That’s the same dodgy ‘journalist’ who had about 10 different managers joining WBA last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasta Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) 6 hours ago, rigger said: And yet they deemed fit, a player who managed 20 minutes then retired. John Fleck didn't retire. He signed for Chesterfield and managed 18 minutes in the cup against Horsham. Made the bench on new years day though. 👍 Edited January 13 by Hasta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted January 13 Author Share Posted January 13 22 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: No Thanks that's all I want. 22 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: do you have any evidence that the process above has taken place yes or no answer please yes, Gestede word and the fact we have already signed 2 players in this window. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hasta Posted January 13 Popular Post Share Posted January 13 My issue with Rudy was when he said one of the reasons we couldn't spend money on players was because "the money we receive for outgoing transfers is paid in instalments". The club has since rowed back and acknowledged that incoming transfers are also 'paid in instalments' so it shouldn't make a difference. The problem is, once Rudy is caught out trying to pull the wool over the fans eyes you then start to doubt everything he says. The Forshaw signing looked a strange one on paper, and now we have the Boro link it starts to look a little bit 'lazy'. 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted January 13 Author Share Posted January 13 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ianrally Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 From The Star Ben Brereton Diaz’s Sheffield United return has been plunged into doubt amid reports one Championship promotion rival holds a key advantage in negotiations. United have been interested in signing Brereton Diaz all month, with manager Chris Wilder prioritising the arrival of attacking reinforcements. The Chilean international bagged six goals in 14 Premier League games on loan in South Yorkshire last season and parent club Southampton have made him available just months after agreeing a £7million fee with Villarreal. Bramall Lane chiefs had been hopeful of sealing a move for Brereton Diaz this week but as of Sunday, that is now highly unlikely - and there has now been fresh suggestions a move might not happen altogether. Sky Sports claim that while the 25-year-old is ‘keen’ on joining United this month, Sunderland and another former club Blackburn Rovers are also interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevidgeBlue Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 47 minutes ago, Tugayisgod said: Doesn't look like Bamford will happen, thank God https://motleedsnews.com/comment/leeds-united-look-set-to-make-patrick-bamford-mistake-as-exit-stance-shared/ Schlupp not looking very likely either - Palace manager saying that he doesn't want to lose him and the player hasn't asked for a move. Bearing in mind his contract expires at the end of the season, the situation only likely to change if someone comes in with a 2-3 year deal and Schlupp decides he wants the security. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.