Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

January Transfer window


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, MB Rover said:

Tronstad 8 weeks apparently

Adam Forshaw, come on down!

"He's only a squad player"

"He'll get like 5mins off the bench"

"He's an experienced head to guide the younger lads in training"

"He's not coming as a starting player"

Laughable planning by the clubs hierarchy.

Worth noting, he was brought on in centre midfield, ahead of JRC yesterday. JE clearly doesn't rate JRC in CM.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davulsukur said:

Adam Forshaw, come on down!

"He's only a squad player"

"He'll get like 5mins off the bench"

"He's an experienced head to guide the younger lads in training"

"He's not coming as a starting player"

Laughable planning by the clubs hierarchy.

Worth noting, he was brought on in centre midfield, ahead of JRC yesterday. JE clearly doesn't rate JRC in CM.

Id say more than 50% of the fanbase (and Elliott Jackson) justified the signing of Forshaw in terms of budget allocation.

Theres no point signing anyone with the mindset of "oh they wont be starting every week" knowing they arent good enough. Weve seen in the last few years that form has fallen off a cliff after christmas due to not having a good enough squad. Yet no one learns.

Our midfield has been excellent all season, but as soon as one of them got injured we see the strength of the team become a big weakness.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CambridgeRover said:

Huge miss, I do think Tronstad is our best player. 

As it stands, whether due to injury or loan recall, the squad will be in a worse position than before the window began.

We possibly had the best FBs and best CM pairing in the league - the only reason why we were competing in and around the Top 6. 

Both CMs are injured, the reliable loanee has gone back and we're left with... what for Coventry on Tuesday? Buckley, Forshaw, JRC and Garrett? Yikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Id say more than 50% of the fanbase (and Elliott Jackson) justified the signing of Forshaw in terms of budget allocation.

Theres no point signing anyone with the mindset of "oh they wont be starting every week" knowing they arent good enough. Weve seen in the last few years that form has fallen off a cliff after christmas due to not having a good enough squad. Yet no one learns.

Our midfield has been excellent all season, but as soon as one of them got injured we see the strength of the team become a big weakness.

It was always going to happen - and it'll happen with Beck shortly. We've flogged a few players this season. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've got time, opportunity and money to do something about the Tronstad injury, before Tuesday if we really want.

But we won't.

Another example of CHOICES of the ownership and management torpedoing our fortunes on the pitch.

The most infuriating part is that there remain supporters who think these injuries are down to bad luck or that the club is powerless in this situation.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said:

With a hamstring injury it is likely to be months as opposed to weeks but people on here saying it’s 6 weeks apparently then it’s 8 weeks apparently. Where is this information coming from?

no idea but hamstrings are notoriously hard to treat,if you rush the player back he could end up with a tear which means an operation and months out

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Id say more than 50% of the fanbase (and Elliott Jackson) justified the signing of Forshaw in terms of budget allocation.

Theres no point signing anyone with the mindset of "oh they wont be starting every week" knowing they arent good enough. Weve seen in the last few years that form has fallen off a cliff after christmas due to not having a good enough squad. Yet no one learns.

Our midfield has been excellent all season, but as soon as one of them got injured we see the strength of the team become a big weakness.

The justification was fair enough, the context being they wanted to spend the majority of the budget on forwards. What’s the alternative if there’s no decent budget? It’s not the fans fault, or Jackson’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Forever Blue said:

The justification was fair enough, the context being they wanted to spend the majority of the budget on forwards. What’s the alternative if there’s no decent budget? It’s not the fans fault, or Jackson’s. 

Bringing in a bad player is just a waste of money even if he's relatively cheap.

Would have been better going with Garrett then we'd have had "even more" money for the forward positions.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, simongarnerisgod said:

no idea but hamstrings are notoriously hard to treat,if you rush the player back he could end up with a tear which means an operation and months out

Oh I know all to well with hamstrings was more questioning the ‘I’m hearing’ 

hearing from who Iv seen no official source confirm the extent of the injury 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.