January Transfer window

[BankEnd Rover]

Rumours from West Brom that Karlan Grant has handed in a transfer request after falling out of favour with moggers. 

Would be a good option, but he'll cost so will never happen. 

[roversfan99]

If he has recurring back injuries, then he will struggle to realise any potential he has either way.

Hes not Championship level at the moment and if fit im not convinced lending him to a Champipnship side (he isnt going to start over Colby Bishop) would be the wisest move.

[roversfan99]

Seems like Sunderland are in strong for Danns. So with him potentially going there and the Egyptian seemingly beyond us financially, is there a chance we again end up empty handed?

[Exiled_Rover]

2 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Seems like Sunderland are in strong for Danns. So with him potentially going there and the Egyptian seemingly beyond us financially, is there a chance we again end up empty handed?

A very strong chance.

[Mattyblue]

6 minutes ago, BankEnd Rover said:

Rumours from West Brom that Karlan Grant has handed in a transfer request after falling out of favour with moggers. 

Would be a good option, but he'll cost so will never happen. 

Only a matter of time with that arm

 

[islander200]

4 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Seems like Sunderland are in strong for Danns. So with him potentially going there and the Egyptian seemingly beyond us financially, is there a chance we again end up empty handed?

If Danns is let out on loan and we are really in for him then surely we would be favourites over Sunderland 

Locality ,relationship with Liverpool with previous loans and less competition for him to get minutes here rather than Sunderland 

[Penwortham Blue]

11 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Seems like Sunderland are in strong for Danns. So with him potentially going there and the Egyptian seemingly beyond us financially, is there a chance we again end up empty handed?

I would be surprised if Sunderland was deemed a better loan for Danns by his club or the player. He will play regularly at Rovers and can commute daily without any issue and it is a path well worn by Morton, Elliott and Beck. I doubt Liverpool will be too concerned about size of a loan fee or wage contribution, they can afford to just want the best development opportunity available.

Edited yesterday at 12:20 by Penwortham Blue

[Penwortham Blue]

3 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

Only a matter of time with that arm

 

Probably came into training with ripped jeans and baseball cap 😂

[Blow-in]

21 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

After 15 years of misery with these owners - yes .

I would only take Greenwood if we could release him into owners house.

[KentExile]

6 minutes ago, islander200 said:

If Danns is let out on loan and we are really in for him then surely we would be favourites over Sunderland 

Locality ,relationship with Liverpool with previous loans and less competition for him to get minutes here rather than Sunderland 

There is one other consideration... money (loan fee etc)

Fingers crossed, our previous relationship with Liverpool stands us in good stead

Edited yesterday at 12:21 by KentExile

[islander200]

13 minutes ago, KentExile said:

There is one other consideration... money (loan fee etc)

Fingers crossed, our previous relationship with Liverpool stands us in good stead

I don't think anyone will be paying a big loan fee for Danns 

[KentExile]

Just now, islander200 said:

I don't think anyone will be paying a big loan fee for Danns 

depends on what we consider "big"

Rovers big money signings are around £1M for a permanent signing.  Sunderland are splashing the cash this window.  which may be the difference between Rovers offering £100K, and Sunderland offering £500K + and extra few million if they are promoted

[chaddyrovers]

2 hours ago, MarkBRFC said:

Our staff don't work on Sundays.

I bet staff are in at Brockhall 

1 hour ago, roversfan99 said:

With 36 hours left, presumably weve had bids accepted and are getting players in to finalise?

Nah, most likely sat waiting and hoping that Liverpool allow us to borrow a kid they have.

They will be lots of things going on and talks between clubs, agents and players. 

Get yourself down to Brockhall and be on site reporter for BRFCS for the latest transfers. 

58 minutes ago, islander200 said:

Ihneacho medical at boro straight loan deal 

just a loan. Not spending any of that £22.5m on a quality striker

24 minutes ago, BankEnd Rover said:

Rumours from West Brom that Karlan Grant has handed in a transfer request after falling out of favour with moggers. 

Would be a good option, but he'll cost so will never happen. 

Would be interesting option for us. Wonder if we will make an approach for him. 

23 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

Seems like Sunderland are in strong for Danns. So with him potentially going there and the Egyptian seemingly beyond us financially, is there a chance we again end up empty handed?

Rovers have a good relationship with Liverpool. Look at the development of Beck here under Eustace. Plus Location and its believe Eustace wants him. 

Also who says Mustafa Mohamed is beyond us financially? 

[islander200]

2 minutes ago, KentExile said:

depends on what we consider "big"

Rovers big money signings are around £1M for a permanent signing.  Sunderland are splashing the cash this window.  which may be the difference between Rovers offering £100K, and Sunderland offering £500K + and extra few million if they are promoted

No chance Sunderland are offering that 

Where does he get minutes for them?

If we truly are in for Danns and Liverpool do decide to loan him we will be big favourites imo 

[islander200]

Just now, chaddyrovers said:

 

just a loan. Not spending any of that £22.5m on a quality striker

 

They have already paid £8 million for an attacker 

Ihneacho is a top quality loan for this division it will cost more than our signing of Kargbo 

[KentExile]

5 minutes ago, islander200 said:

No chance Sunderland are offering that 

Where does he get minutes for them?

If we truly are in for Danns and Liverpool do decide to loan him we will be big favourites imo 

I would imagine up front

Isidor is a wide player by trade, only playing up front by default as they do not have any decent strikers

Edited yesterday at 12:47 by KentExile

[martonrover]

3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Also who says Mustafa Mohamed is beyond us financially?

Suhail Pasha, ( unless you can get him drunk 😉 )

[TugaysMarlboro]

5 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

I bet staff are in at Brockhall 

They will be lots of things going on and talks between clubs, agents and players. 

Get yourself down to Brockhall and be on site reporter for BRFCS for the latest transfers. 

just a loan. Not spending any of that £22.5m on a quality striker

Would be interesting option for us. Wonder if we will make an approach for him. 

Rovers have a good relationship with Liverpool. Look at the development of Beck here under Eustace. Plus Location and its believe Eustace wants him. 

Also who says Mustafa Mohamed is beyond us financially? 

I vote for an RF99 and Chaddy deadline day live stream

[islander200]

Just now, KentExile said:

I would imagine up front

Isidor is a wide player by trade, only playing tere by default as they do not have any decent strikers

But he has been doing well for them up front, I genuinely don't think with them going so well they will sign Danns with a view of starting him up front and moving Isidor 

Even if they did take Isidor out of the striker position who do they drop from the wide positions 

He might not even be let out but if he is I do believe we will be favourites .I don't think financial rewards will be that much of a consideration 

[Inferi]

2 minutes ago, KentExile said:

depends on what we consider "big"

Rovers big money signings are around £1M for a permanent signing.  Sunderland are splashing the cash this window.  which may be the difference between Rovers offering £100K, and Sunderland offering £500K + and extra few million if they are promoted

I guess we could counter this by agreeing to pay severe financial penalties if he's not playing for us. But of course it's a terrible situation if the snake Suhail is essentially forcing Eustace to play a player regardless of his performances.

[KentExile]

30 minutes ago, islander200 said:

But he has been doing well for them up front, I genuinely don't think with them going so well they will sign Danns with a view of starting him up front and moving Isidor 

Even if they did take Isidor out of the striker position who do they drop from the wide positions 

He might not even be let out but if he is I do believe we will be favourites .I don't think financial rewards will be that much of a consideration 

Mundle and Watson who play wide left for them are both injured

There would also be the option of them rotating rather than running the same 11 players into the ground

They signed Le Fee, despite already having a midfield of Bellingham, Rigg, Neil, Browne & Samed, so the thought of them wanting an extra striker hardly seems ludicrous to me

Edited yesterday at 13:20 by KentExile

[chaddyrovers]

3 minutes ago, islander200 said:

They have already paid £8 million for an attacker 

Ihneacho is a top quality loan for this division it will cost more than our signing of Kargbo 

Whittaker was replacing Jones who they sold to Luton for around £5m. Plus Whittaker isn't a striker like Latth is. 

Iheanacho last season at this level for Leicester got 5 goals in 23 games for them, So I wouldn't agree that is top quality loan.

I thought They would have gone for Adebayo from Luton or Wright/Simms from Coventry 

[ageoftherover]

1 hour ago, Scoobydo said:

As if being a Rovers supporter isn’t depressing enough, being a Dallas Mavericks fan compounds the misery (off topic) 

I'm a Panthers supporter in the NRL and the contrast is mind blowing.

Edited yesterday at 12:58 by ageoftherover

[islander200]

2 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Whittaker was replacing Jones who they sold to Luton for around £5m. Plus Whittaker isn't a striker like Latth is. 

Iheanacho last season at this level for Leicester got 5 goals in 23 games for them, So I wouldn't agree that is top quality loan.

I thought They would have gone for Adebayo from Luton or Wright/Simms from Coventry 

They have also signed Travers and Giles expensive loan deals for good players at this level 

Boro are showing far more ambition than us in the market...surely you can't disagree with that.

They will also add other players most likely before deadline 

[Leonard Venkhater]

1 minute ago, islander200 said:

They have also signed Travers and Giles expensive loan deals for good players at this level 

Boro are showing far more ambition than us in the market...surely you can't disagree with that.

They will also add other players most likely before deadline 

"X are showing far more ambition than us."

There are so many EFL clubs to fill in this blank.

Venky's and stooges out!