Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

v Sheffield Wednesday (a) - 10/12/2024


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bluebruce said:

Surely they will have to look at it to determine whether he touched it. You only said 'if' and 'I think' about it yourself. I've watched replays from several angles, several times, and I'm no clearer whether he touched it. Needs a slow-mo HD look.

No it doesn't.

Gueye will be desperate for the goal, the Sheff Weds defender will be desperate for it not to be an own goal. Panel doesn't need to meet. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

No it doesn't.

Gueye will be desperate for the goal, the Sheff Weds defender will be desperate for it not to be an own goal. Panel doesn't need to meet. 

Those are always the circumstances when a goal may be an OG. Changes nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bluebruce said:

I think that's a possibility, but I still haven't seen a replay where I can be certain he got a touch on it at all. If he did then as you say he should get the goal.

 
 

I think this is as good as we’re going to get…

Edited by Dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, booth said:

Screenshot2024-12-11at21_56_06.png.3859d576d0a4e4fb9c612a57464c2ec5.png

 

He definitely gets his head on it.

Wednesday players head is sideways so he didn't "ear" it in.

Not only is that blurry as shit but it looks more like, if anything, his head isn't on it at all. Again, I'd need to see it in a slow-mo hd to feel confident. But he'll either be allowed to keep it or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bluebruce said:

Sorry I don't understand what you're trying to say. How does any of that mean it won't be looked at?


If they review only 3 or 4 a season…why this one ?

What’s at stake?

Who loses out by giving to Gueye?

Why would they be so aggrieved? 

Who from Sheffield Wednesday is going to dispute it…? 

What would their motivation be? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Herbie6590 said:


If they review only 3 or 4 a season…why this one ?

What’s at stake?

Who loses out by giving to Gueye?

Why would they be so aggrieved? 

Who from Sheffield Wednesday is going to dispute it…? 

What would their motivation be? 

Never mind Wednesday I don't understand what the the motivation of some of our supporters trying to take the goal of Gueye is.

Not a difficult one for me, Gueye headed it, it brushed the top of the defender's head and went in. It was going in before it made contact with the defender's head so no problem.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bluebruce said:

Not only is that blurry as shit but it looks more like, if anything, his head isn't on it at all. Again, I'd need to see it in a slow-mo hd to feel confident. But he'll either be allowed to keep it or not.

That picture has clearly been frozen after he'd headed the ball!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Herbie6590 said:


If they review only 3 or 4 a season…why this one ?

What’s at stake?

Who loses out by giving to Gueye?

Why would they be so aggrieved? 

Who from Sheffield Wednesday is going to dispute it…? 

What would their motivation be? 

That's the Premier League's committee not the EFL's.  Nothing was mentioned of how often the EFL's Dubious Goals Committee meets.

When is anything at stake with such a thing, beyond accurate records and maybe a dispute over top scorer (which could only be known near or at season's end). When does anyone lose out, unless it's two teammates arguing over who scored? Yet it tends to be ones like this - was it the scoring team's player or an OG? Why would anyone be so aggrieved? Following this line of logic I'd say the panels, Prem or EFL, would never meet.

We've definitely had players get goals chalked off by them before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Never mind Wednesday I don't understand what the the motivation of some of our supporters trying to take the goal of Gueye is.

Not a difficult one for me, Gueye headed it, it brushed the top of the defender's head and went in. It was going in before it made contact with the defender's head so no problem.

I already answered that on page 19. Nobody here is trying to take it off him, primarily because we don't have the power to do so, but also because obviously we want him to be the scorer for his confidence.

That makes utterly zero difference to any objective debate about whether he did in fact score it or not. Emotive bias doesn't factor into that. What we want to be true isn't necessarily true.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bluebruce said:

That's the Premier League's committee not the EFL's.  Nothing was mentioned of how often the EFL's Dubious Goals Committee meets.

When is anything at stake with such a thing, beyond accurate records and maybe a dispute over top scorer (which could only be known near or at season's end). When does anyone lose out, unless it's two teammates arguing over who scored? Yet it tends to be ones like this - was it the scoring team's player or an OG? Why would anyone be so aggrieved? Following this line of logic I'd say the panels, Prem or EFL, would never meet.

We've definitely had players get goals chalked off by them before.

The bookies have paid out on it already apparently.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.