Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 13:48, Herbie6590 said:

He will end up signing an NDA & the club will spin the family line...

Expand  

Yes I fully expect that narrative from the club, but I do not want it to be said by Eustace. Otherwise it helps Waggott, Pasha and co. 

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:11, roverblue said:

This just reinforces the point we are being run like in administration. Did I once read this costs £4m a year? If so it is an obvious saving to make for a club on its knees financially, however terminal to its footballing future.

Expand  

It’s about £4m but half of it comes from funding. I think the cost to the club is about £2m

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 13:50, davulsukur said:

Imagine next season when we shift about 3000 adult season tickets. 

Absolutely mental.

Expand  

I think you can halve that if the owners are still here .

I got a feeling Waggott will be  gone very soon (retired not sacked ) leaving Suhail alone .

Then what happens ?

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 07:48, Herbie6590 said:

That’s the question for which I have absolutely no answer…it makes no sense other than some kind of subjective wish to avoid reputational damage of being seen to walk away from a failure. 🤷‍♂️

Expand  

Yeah, this is the bit that just defies any explanation, which then leads to the view there must be something we are not seeing which leads to conspiracy theories.

Its hard to believe with all the heat from the court case etc they are just ignoring the situation at the club entirely, there must be a reason they want to keep it but minimise costs. But what is that reason...?

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:10, RevidgeBlue said:

I cant see the difference from their point of view.

Realistically to offload control they're going to have to write off the debt due to themselves and more or less give the Club away anyhow.

(Unless we get promoted)

Expand  

They will have no control.That is why 

Clubs that go Into administration it is usually because their external debt is large and the owners can't or wont pay it off and they put themselves into admin.

Most of our debt is internal.

You mentioned selling Brockhall.Why wouldn't they just do that themselves rather than have an administrator do it who will take less than market value?

 

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:11, roverblue said:

This just reinforces the point we are being run like in administration. Did I once read this costs £4m a year? If so it is an obvious saving to make for a club on its knees financially, however terminal to its footballing future.

Expand  

Nothing like that in real terms.

When the last attempt to sell Brockhall was made I think the figures were it cost £3.2m to run but we got a grant of £1.9m towards the running of it.

A bargain in relative terms you'd imagine most regimes would think.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:15, Waggy76 said:

I think you can halve that if the owners are still here .

I got a feeling Waggott will be  gone very soon (retired not sacked ) leaving Suhail alone .

Then what happens ?

Expand  

Gestede is nailed on to get the job. Exactly the reason he is in the shadows not rocking the boat.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:15, islander200 said:

You mentioned selling Brockhall.Why wouldn't they just do that themselves rather than have an administrator do it who will take less than market value?

Expand  

I wouldnt put it past Waggott to have another crack at doing that at some point.

Then when thats been done, most of the senior players have walked out and Carter's been sold, what advantage is there in putting the Club up for sale as opposed to into administration other than not losing face back in India?

Edited by RevidgeBlue
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:16, RevidgeBlue said:

Nothing like that in real terms.

When the last attempt to sell Brockhall was made I think the figures were it cost £3.2m to run but we got a grant of £1.9m towards the running of it.

A bargain in relative terms you'd imagine most regimes would think.

Expand  

As always nothing makes sense with these lot. The academy has been our life support for players in the first team and provided the biggest transfer fee received for a player. 

Scaling it back makes no sense, if anything they should be investing more into it.

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:18, Trinidad Rover said:

Gestede is nailed on to get the job. Exactly the reason he is in the shadows not rocking the boat.

Expand  

Could happen , I was more enquiring on Suhails position .He is going to be put under a lot scrutiny very soon.

Cannot see Gestede protecting him like Waggott ..

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:22, Waggy76 said:

Could happen , I was more enquiring on Suhails position .He is going to be put under a lot scrutiny very soon.

Cannot see Gestede protecting him like Waggott ..

Expand  

Suhail is the COO and runs the club for our owners. he is decision maker 

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:21, davulsukur said:

As always nothing makes sense with these lot. The academy has been our life support for players in the first team and provided the biggest transfer fee received for a player. 

Scaling it back makes no sense, if anything they should be investing more into it.

Expand  

Exactly so. We should be a magnet for all the best young talent in the NW.

Lot easier to break into our side than City/Liverpool/ManUre etc

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:25, chaddyrovers said:

well we see in the coming hours what happened 

Expand  

Indeed we will.

To answer one of your other questions I dont know if Ive been calling for it as long as you, but for the last few months Ive been saying that Eustace needed to be given an improved deal and it was more important than any signings we could make in the transfer window.

Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 13:35, roversfan99 said:

Head coach, manager. Dont be pedantic.

Expand  

2 different roles and one you don't get. We haven't had manager for 18 months. 

  On 10/02/2025 at 13:35, roversfan99 said:

So what you are saying is if you think the head coach should get to choose the players he is working with, that makes you exempt from being able to critique them? What utter bollocks.

Expand  

Its yourself saying Eustace should sign the players he wants but when x player is mentioned as his choice, you slammed and say no no and no to it. 

 

  On 10/02/2025 at 13:35, roversfan99 said:

He should have been given a new deal in the last few months but it shouldnt make a difference here either way. If we were run properly and gave him reasonable and competitive resources to do his job, then even if a side in the relegation zone activated his release clause, it would be laughed off.

Expand  

I don't remember you ever posting on here that he should be given a new deal unlike myself who said back in September we should be offering him a new deal. I don't remember you posting in agreement. do you?

Derby has made the approach and activate his release clause cos Eustace is interested in the job and the terms offered. 

 

  On 10/02/2025 at 13:35, roversfan99 said:

As it is and regardless of how "decent" you think the January window was. 22nd placed Derby is a more attractive proposition to a talented "head coach" as opposed to 6th placed Rovers. If ever you wanted to sum up Venkys run Rovers.

Expand  

a poster on here has told you why Eustace is interested in leaving the Rovers job and for the Derby job. Where I guess he has been told he has funds to spend in the summer and a greater say in recruitment than he does at Rovers

what don't you get? 

so unless he gets offered assurances he wants here, I suspect he will be off there

Posted

Given they're supposed to be working together / the face of the board you'd expect Gestede to sit with Waggot and co at matches as you'd see at other clubs. He doesn't - there's no united front, they're all in it for themselves.

Posted (edited)
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:35, chaddyrovers said:

2 different roles and one you don't get. We haven't had manager for 18 months. 

Its yourself saying Eustace should sign the players he wants but when x player is mentioned as his choice, you slammed and say no no and no to it. 

 

I don't remember you ever posting on here that he should be given a new deal unlike myself who said back in September we should be offering him a new deal. I don't remember you posting in agreement. do you?

Derby has made the approach and activate his release clause cos Eustace is interested in the job and the terms offered. 

 

a poster on here has told you why Eustace is interested in leaving the Rovers job and for the Derby job. Where I guess he has been told he has funds to spend in the summer and a greater say in recruitment than he does at Rovers

what don't you get? 

so unless he gets offered assurances he wants here, I suspect he will be off there

Expand  

That same poster said Eustace was given assurances last summer that the McGuire money would be available for him to spend. That didn't come to fruition.

So why would he think any assurances now will be different?

Edited by TugaysMarlboro
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:01, Torgeir said:

No one will buy this club once the fanbase is gone. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Expand  

The fan base has been dwindling slowly and those regulars that would bellow out on the terraces have all moved on from football got new lives other stuff to do on a weekend etc

Edited by ...
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:26, chaddyrovers said:

Suhail is the COO and runs the club for our owners. he is decision maker 

Expand  

He isn't the decision maker. He is the conduit for the Punekars and right now the only one with a direct line to India. They ultimately make the decisions based on what he tells them.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 10/02/2025 at 14:34, RevidgeBlue said:

Indeed we will.

To answer one of your other questions I dont know if Ive been calling for it as long as you, but for the last few months Ive been saying that Eustace needed to be given an improved deal and it was more important than any signings we could make in the transfer window.

Expand  

I said it 6 months. People like Eddie disagree with me. Most others didn't agree either. 

  On 10/02/2025 at 14:35, JamieUK said:

Given they're supposed to be working together / the face of the board you'd expect Gestede to sit with Waggot and co at matches as you'd see at other clubs. He doesn't - there's no united front, they're all in it for themselves.

Expand  

when I looked at the director box I see Gestede and Owen sitting on the same row and next to Pasha, Waggott and another people

  On 10/02/2025 at 14:39, ... said:

@K-Hodwhen did you say the next meeting is?

Expand  

Tomorrow night

  On 10/02/2025 at 14:41, TugaysMarlboro said:

That same poster said Eustace was given assurances last summer that the McGuire money would be available for him to spend. That didn't come to fruition.

So why would he think any assurances now will be different?

Expand  

Cos he is stronger position in terms of league position and he has out performed what most people thought this season would be like

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.