Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 13/03/2025 at 16:29, lraC said:

You trust the people running the club a lot more than I do.

If they have done it in the past, I’m sure they would do it again and it seems to me, that keeping the club as a self funding operation, is more important than success on the pitch.

My line up yesterday, would have been.

 

                                       Toth

Brittain.               Hyam. Carter.        Ribeiro 

Jrc.                       Travis. Tronstad.     Buckley

 

                              Dennis Gueye. 
 

Have a listen to the Bennett podcast and see if you still trust the decision makers as much as you currently seem to.

That podcast is so frustrating.

Play for free for 2 years or go. FFS

These clowns

Posted
10 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

We made Norwich look good by sitting off and avoiding pressing their clumsy centre backs. Bristol City showing how its done.

That has been the real surprise to me of Ismael's three games as manager. We simply haven't pressed high up the pitch which is something we did well under Tomasson and Eustace. 

Teams are finding us too easy to play against.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, arbitro said:

That has been the real surprise to me of Ismael's three games as manager. We simply haven't pressed high up the pitch which is something we did well under Tomasson and Eustace. 

Teams are finding us too easy to play against.

The worst bit is, poor teams are finding us too easy to play against.

Posted

What were they thinking giving him a 3 and a half year deal? 

It was always going to be difficult for him if he didn't hit the ground running. Now he's hit the ground face first it could get very uncomfortable for him very quickly.

I'm still hoping he can turn it around somewhat because as we all know it's very frustrating in the past watching us refuse to sack a manager (Coyle, Kean the most egregious examples).

Any change in shape should've happened in the summer when he had time to implement it properly. He's got to revert back to what's worked for the side this season and scrape a few wins for respectability. Because if we continue in our current form he won't be getting the benefit of the doubt. These fixtures are on paper the easiest we will have until the end of the season. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

From what I can see, at three and a half years this contract length is longer than what any other manager has been given here on appointment since this lot darkened our doors - why?

Edited by Mattyblue
  • Like 4
Posted
56 minutes ago, Mattyblue said:

From what I can see, at three and a half years this contract length is longer than what any other manager has been given here on appointment since this lot darkened our doors - why?

He's cheap and will do as he's told.

Probably him that demanded that length and the club accepted as the next choice would have been even shitter and probably would have brought a lot of scrutiny and attention towards them.

  • Like 1
  • Backroom
Posted

It's also possible the club negotiated a cheap break clause in the contract which allows them to terminate without any major financial penalty at a certain point.

This would suggest a degree of competence which seems unlikely based on past history, but nonetheless.

Posted

He’s cheap and will do as his told could have been many others too - Bowyer, Coyle etc. they weren’t given three and a half year deals… even King Rat, the stooges stooge wasn’t.

  • Like 1
Posted

3.5 year contract looks worse and worse, whoever made that decision needs to be fired.

Even if you thought this clown was the right man for the job (he isn’t) what justification is there for 3.5 years? Ridiculous

  • Like 2
  • Moderation Lead
Posted

Usually, when a new manager comes in, you see some sort of reaction or something to cling to.

There’s genuinely nothing.

The players look lost and like they’ve met on the car park before the match.

  • Like 5
Posted

A disaster, as predicted. A good DOF hires a manager that fits the players available. Ours hired one that only knows how to play 3-4-3.

Posted
3 minutes ago, K-Hod said:

Usually, when a new manager comes in, you see some sort of reaction or something to cling to.

There’s genuinely nothing.

The players look lost and like they’ve met on the car park before the match.

As posted elsewhere.

I don't think it's a coincidence we're losing these games.

Whenever there's a sniff of playoffs we suddenly lose.

  • Backroom
Posted

Looks like Ismael is where Waggott and Suhail's luck runs out when it comes to bringing in unemployed cheap managers expected to keep the titanic afloat. And believe me, it's been nothing but a ridiculous streak of luck for the pair of them. 

  • Like 5
Posted

The lack of desire, emotion, reaction, anything from him on the touchline makes me more angry about the whole thing

 

either way; good for him, he’s secured a payday and some compo when he’s sacked - journeyman to the core like the rest 

 

as a player there’s no inspiration if he’s listless and disinterested

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, OnionBalaji said:

The lack of desire, emotion, reaction, anything from him on the touchline makes me more angry about the whole thing

 

either way; good for him, he’s secured a payday and some compo when he’s sacked - journeyman to the core like the rest 

 

as a player there’s no inspiration if he’s listless and disinterested

 

 

Its not just the managers fault.

Yes he's useless, but who's employed him?

  • Like 2
Posted

He won't be sacked even if we don't win another game for the rest of the season.

Then we start next season poorly, in the bottom 3 and even then they'll wait until Feb so the next manager cannot spend any money in the Jan transfer window.

League 1 beckons.

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, J*B said:

A disaster, as predicted. A good DOF hires a manager that fits the players available. Ours hired one that only knows how to play 3-4-3.

It's the wrong appointment. We needed someone who could grind out games with this squad/injury list.

But not signing that striker we needed in January, again, and also bringing in players no one else wanted is hurting us. Eustace left because he knew his stock would fall due to incompetence and lack of support above.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, booth said:

It's the wrong appointment. We needed someone who could grind out games with this squad/injury list.

But not signing that striker we needed in January, again, and also bringing in players no one else wanted is hurting us. Eustace left because he knew his stock would fall due to incompetence and lack of support above.

Yes Ismael is absolutely wank.

But who's selecting the team?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.