T4E Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 In fact Jordan got it completely wrong. Tom Pringle It's Andy Welsh Text from Jordan, via T4E The text actually said that it was "Andy Wesh from Stockpost", So I dont think we should take that too seriously.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Tris Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Sorry Tris, Your out of order there, if people care to read back through the posts there is no mention of Jordan phoning a Radio station. In fact Jordan got it completely wrong. Tom Pringle It's Andy Welsh Text from Jordan, via T4E Happy to confirm that Jordan is NOT implicated in the current player-name-revealing scandal which is threatening to engulf Blackburn with Darwen and possibly Western Civilisation as we know it.
Hughesy Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 What I cant understand is how it may of affected our chances of getting any deal for him? He has played and scored for our team so surely we are ahead of any1 else that may be interested. We have actually given him a chance to prove himself so surely we are in pole position. After all we do have an excellent academy and im sure we could improve him.
grizfoot Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 You watch him now he'll turn rubbish now and end up getting sent back from where he come from
FourLaneBlue Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Tris isn't having a go at Jordan, its called sarcasm..... it does seem to get lost on some people though. I know...from now on we should put 'WE'RE ONLY JOKING' before we all get involved in these VolpatoGate revelations.
Flopsy Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 ACtually you're all wrong Ive found out who it is, I cant go in to details but looks remarkably like Sally Gunnel
Tom Pringle Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Bugger! after revealing the name of the possible trialist and with the hit squad out on patrol i best go into hiding. You ain't sin me.....right!
AlanK Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 It will certainly be interesting to see who the mystery trialist was after the dust has settled.
blue/white Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Can 't be Forlan... At last glance, ol' Diego was in Peru kicking lumps into Paraguayan shins.
joey_big_nose Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 As the trialist is playing with the first team players again today it would seem that if we did sign him it would be with the idea of putting him in the squad. Previous aquisitons for the reserves/academy, Darbyshire etc., have never played for the first team even in friendlies as far as I know. Also the fuss seems a bit to substantial for a purely youth player. Nice to see Volpatogate has not as yet prompted him being sent home.
Alan75 Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 As the trialist is playing with the first team players again today it would seem that if we did sign him it would be with the idea of putting him in the squad. Previous aquisitons for the reserves/academy, Darbyshire etc., have never played for the first team even in friendlies as far as I know. Also the fuss seems a bit to substantial for a purely youth player. Nice to see Volpatogate has not as yet prompted him being sent home. trialist is not playing in first game
joey_big_nose Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 As the trialist is playing with the first team players again today it would seem that if we did sign him it would be with the idea of putting him in the squad. Previous aquisitons for the reserves/academy, Darbyshire etc., have never played for the first team even in friendlies as far as I know. Also the fuss seems a bit to substantial for a purely youth player. Nice to see Volpatogate has not as yet prompted him being sent home. trialist is not playing in first game Yeah, just found that out.... how confusing.
bob fleming Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 FFS bring the season on quickly, sane and sound people are posting utter drivel. Normal life is being turned into a conspiracy theory. What do you mean by that? Are you getting at me Tris? So it is Sally Gunnel? Or was it Diego Forlan who phoned Radio Lancs? All very confusing and I've only been gone a day. For what it's worth I still don't know who it is - and that's the way I like it baby - thank you very much, I'm bound to fall out with someone for knowing or even for not knowing, in fact even by posting in this thread I'm leaving myself open to all sorts of accusations. Saunders: "You know too much Mr Fleming. You must die." or "You know too little Mr Fleming. You must die." or even "You know as much as the next man Mr Fleming, You must die anyway." You can't win with him. He's Welsh see isn't it. Where's Yorke gone? Pins for tea mother? Black! Black!
Gareth Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Ive found out who it is, I cant go in to details but looks remarkably like Sally Gunnel Ray Parlour?
Manchester Blue Posted July 21, 2004 Posted July 21, 2004 Souness was fairly annoyed about the fan who rang the radio by all accounts. Would say that Souness was out of order but for the fact that the fan in question knew the name wasn;t for public consumption. He was also privvy to the info as he is in the press section so really is abusing his privelege by ringing the radio. The fact that he named himself, dedicated fan or not, shows his motives for doing this IMO.
RevidgeBlue Posted July 21, 2004 Posted July 21, 2004 Souness was fairly annoyed about the fan who rang the radio by all accounts. Would say that Souness was out of order but for the fact that the fan in question knew the name wasn;t for public consumption. He was also privvy to the info as he is in the press section so really is abusing his privelege by ringing the radio. The fact that he named himself, dedicated fan or not, shows his motives for doing this IMO. Fair comment.
Jordan Posted July 21, 2004 Posted July 21, 2004 We were talking to Souey last night and he said the reason we didnt want Romeo De Pato(or who ever he is) is because we are going to try and sign him.
rover6 Posted July 21, 2004 Posted July 21, 2004 We were talking to Souey last night and he said the reason we didnt want Romeo De Pato(or who ever he is) is because we are going to try and sign him. Is it me or does that sound like the words of an inhibriated person? We didn't want him because we're trying to sign him
Recommended Posts