booth

Blames the fans, says he’s not in fear of his job. And there’s the problem right there.

What’s all this Elliott in the middle business? Bennett, Evans? 😧

A proper club management structure with the power to make changes based on what’s happening on the pitch. A proper recruitment of future first team managers and assistants and acknowledgement that the manager is of primary, not secondary importance. A clear intent to get the club into the Premier League to try and rectify the financial burden caused by the mistakes of the owners. That would be a great start.

It’s a question based on this. “Do we think Waggott would come to a club in millions of pounds of debt and slipping into obscurity just to sell off some land for some houses? I think there would be much more attractive options than where the club was when they came in and more importantly where it was heading.” I just didn’t see clubs queuing up to sign SW up as their chief executive, nor am I aware of any previous successes that would lead me to believe he’s the man to lead the club. So I was wondering which better or equal options than taking over as CEO of “a club in millions of pounds of debt and slipping into obscurity.” It must be well documented for you to be so sure. Unless you’ve spoken to his wife?

What were his other options?

Now down to 16th without even playing, no chance of Mowbray getting the chop.

All the ridiculous decisions both pre and during match but Mowbray will scab a win here, guaranteed. Someone like Elliott will bail him out.

He'll be on the phone blaming the pitch, the injuries, the cold weather and the cardboard cut outs of the fans. Anything but his bizarre tactics and ropey signings.

Souness got us promoted season after. edit: ignore, just seen someone beat me to it.

It’s like he switched on a cheat.

So either morning or late morning to them. Suppose it depends on how confused they are or whether Barry was having a party.

1. They are mates. 2. They’ll sack Waggott. The only time Venkys have ever shown frustration and decisiveness is when an executive presented a negative view of the manager.

Drink, feck, drink, drink!

It’s the defence and has been since he arrived, yet he chose to put that to the back of his mind. And now we’re seeing the consequences of that continual neglect as he’s now forced to play two kids at the back, a Leeds outcast and the only decent one amongst them who is continually used as scapegoat.

It’s different because it’s worse and now the penny has dropped for a lot more people, but yes other than that business as usual.

Armstrong and senior training centre sold, Elliott going back, Nyambe leaving. Then Mowbray praying for players like Gallagher and Brereton to score goals (from wide areas), Dack a false 9 and relegation looming. McBride on the bench. And he still won't sign any decent defenders. Mowbray. "It's up to the owners."

If they take Johnson on until the end of the season that's him in the job for good whether results are good, bad or indifferent. Venky's don't like to stretch themselves. Besides there's a much higher likelihood of them giving Venus the caretaker role.

If you can't find 10 great players, make a couple up and count one twice! I'm now convinced Wood is Mowbray's PR guy. Also spot the defenders in that list.

Such heights!

Or just look at the league table, the daft signings, the lack of proper defensive signings. Stick to the facts and you can't go wrong.

Anyone who thinks that the disappointment is purely about losing tonight has either. A: Watched every game this season with their eyes closed. B: Watched every game this season with their eyes closed.

He doesn't need to kick buckets around with these boys, they look you in the eye.

From that interview he's fully expecting 3 points from Coventry to get him out of his own badly defended hole.