No impediment then!!!! I assume WATR will drill down on the no impediment line trotted about by Waggott, in the next meeting?

That's an absolutely brilliant post, but given the post made by Tomphil are we talking a bank guaranteed here, or a bond with hard cash deposited? Also I assume this is at risk, but in what circumstances would the forfeit the bond, or have to pay the value of the bank guarantee, dependent on what applies?

It depends what he said at the interview. I can make you millions, with my contacts in Europe. The proof is the signing I made happen of Maguire, which was at 20 times his true value. That was all done and dusted, until the tea lady spilled the contents of the teapot, onto his contract and we missed the deadline.

No.

Has anyone sent this to Waggott with a link to the Oxford English Dictionary, explaining the meaning of the word impediment? https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/impediment

Send him some Chile Con Carne, that might do the trick.

That’s a bent ref too and very topical after today.

My memory playing tricks on me. Cheers for posting and what a farce

It was amazing how quickly that spread, as from having very few of my schoolmates, supporting Rovers, back then, most used the chant in the playground if one of us shot wide during our many mini playtime games of 8 or 9 a side.

That's another one, I have never forgotten. I watched it on Sky and to make it worse, some of the pundits tried to justify the "foul" being given. Can you ever imagine that being given, in reverse? Never ever and even less so, when Sir Alex was in charge. PS I think it was a Sherwood "foul" by the way, but Shearer scored from his headed pass.

People still wonder to this day what "Beamo" means, but the older ones amongst us know exactly what it signifies.

There are a few on his back, in some cases undeservedly.

A great and very unexpected win and very timely too. The first goal was pure poetry and the second not far behind. That’s how to play the beautiful game and beats a hopeful punt up the pitch hands down. A shout out for Ohashi, who I thought was brilliant today and deserved a goal for his work rate alone.

It’s been a game worth watching so far.

The match was a sell out, so it was beamed back to Ewood on the big screen. I couldn’t believe the decision when I saw it live, but when I saw it on match of the day later, I also came to the conclusion that it was a corrupt one. There is no way a qualified referee could not know it was a stone wall pen.

Bernard will be very proud of him, I swear.

I honestly don’t think anyone on here, would mistake a few bad results as a plight, compared to 10 years of what must be close to the worst owners ever in English football.

A straight swap for Robins, would do for me.

I don't know if this is tongue in cheek, but have you not noticed we have a few issues here and there and that is putting it mildly. Perhaps you are happy with the way the club is being run, but I think you will find you are in the minority, if that is the case.

Hopefully Eustace is on their wanted list, as the sooner he goes the better for me. I have never taken to the guy.

At lease we now know that Eustace is safe, even if we fail to sore in the next 4.

As a stuntman?

We are 18/1 on William Hill and Paddy power. Those odds will have tumbled by the international break.

No wonder it was undisclosed. I would not want to be the person responsible for that fee, if it is at the level, quoted in this thread. He could well be used to lift up our new bus, if we get a flat tyre, but his goal scoring ability, deflates me.

I have never forgotten that penalty incident at Charlton, or the comments made by Alan Hansen on match of the day about it. “You will never see a clearer penalty in your life”. A biased opinion or not, it’s got to be the worst decision, I have ever seen on a football pitch ever and I’ve seen some bad ones.