Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Mike E

Backroom
  • Posts

    14008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Other groups

Subscriber

Mike E last won the day on April 8

Mike E had the most liked content!

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Location
    Clayton-le-Moors, Lancashire

Recent Profile Visitors

20910 profile views

Mike E's Achievements

World Cup

World Cup (9/9)

  • Great Content Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • One week done
  • 28 Days Later
  • Week Streak Rare

Recent Badges

15.2k

Reputation

  1. Difference being he had fallen out with his manager and had just been regularly playing in the Europa League for Vitesse.
  2. I’d argue we didn’t even want Forshaw, given we actively released him.
  3. Disagree entirely. Lowe getting out is a HUGE positive. Rumours he was fired and rehired in a shady way around the time Lambert was around.
  4. It’s info or knowledge that everyone has. Just look at the wages other clubs pay compared to us, and look at the players we get linked with who turn up elsewhere. Or the number of times it has been reported in the last 3 years that we’ve made an offer to a player and then low-balled them when they arrive to sign their contract. It’s not a mystery.
  5. As much as I have enjoyed some of the recent kits, I can’t bring myself to buy one. It’s actually not to do with my Venky-hatred, but affordability. As K-Hod said earlier, £60 for a football shirt is mental. I have spent less (very often half the price) purchasing better-fitting shirts made from better quality fabrics, that are genuinely wearable in non-sport settings. All from this site, or from FootballTown or from various retro-kit sites.
  6. Yeah, THAT’S what’s unacceptable, not the bog standard kit or the way our club’s name is being dragged through elephant shit in international news outlets…
  7. To any journo worth their salt (which is the whole problem), that is a story in itself.
  8. Ormskirk is nearly the halfway point between Brockhall and Wrexham…
  9. I’ve said before from my time in the Trust, in addition to those who made public offers (The two Ian’s, and the Qataris), there are at least 4 potential owners (I believe all are consortia) who had maintained an interest from when they first privately engaged Venkys up to at least the point I left the Trust a couple of years ago. That means they were still interested during our L1 season. Nobody should underestimate the appeal to new potential owners of the ‘kudos’ of ‘taking a founding member of the FL and PL back to the top’. It holds real appeal for those people that can afford to play Football Manager in real life. But it continues to beg the questions: Why does that not appeal to Venkys? Why do they not sell or seek external investment? What is in it for them to cling to our carcass?
  10. Now that I’ve paid attention to the source of the figures, could Rachel Dugdale have based her figure on the fact Venkys London Limited costs (year to 31/3/24) were £43 million?
  11. Fair point actually. Although that does just remind me what a shitshow Venkys have reduced us to 😕
  12. You think £6.4m isn’t realistic? If we include events since those accounts were finalised, including the sacking of two managers and a DOF, as well as multiple backroom staff, and around £1.8-2m in agent fees alone, then I think we could hit that additional figure reasonably quickly.
  13. We do accept it, but you keep using it as some sort of brag. Prioritising Rovers games over literally everything isn’t the flex you think it is.
  14. Girls who rejected City, Everton, and Chelsea pathways for Rovers (including two who did so purely for their love of Rovers) have been badly let down. I don’t like what our club has become at all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.