
vyeo
Members-
Posts
581 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Uncouth Garb - The BRFCS Store
Everything posted by vyeo
-
[Archived] Southampton 3 - 2 Rovers
vyeo replied to ihateburnley's topic in Football Messageboard Archive
what did souness do to emerton at half time!! come'on keep it up guys!!! great finish from dickov -
[Archived] Southampton 3 - 2 Rovers
vyeo replied to ihateburnley's topic in Football Messageboard Archive
philips was clearly onside. question is... what was emerton doing?! and what was short doing too?? sad. and what is souness doing??? matteo is no left winger... everybody knows that! sorry for tone. very upset at the moment. urgh -
ferguson: agree totally. i was unsure whether it was him or de pedro who got OUT of the ball's way for that freekick. after watching numerous displays over the last 2 days, i think its a combination of both. javier turned away, while our captain courageous turned away and put his hands up to cover his chest. hope this never happens again. tugay: i thought he did pretty well... looked our classiest player by far... and that drive from 30 yards wasnt too far away was it...? anyway, hope that souness actually LEARNS something from this match and play a proper formation for the saints match...
-
Perhaps Souness realizes this, which would explain his interest in El Hadmouai (who is described as a very pacy forward). Like jim, though, I'm still wondering where the goals are going to come from. i am hoping and praying that beyond all odds, that little dickov will repeat his form of last season. for me, him hitting double digits will be miraculous, if not nigh on impossible. at the risk of being slated, i believe that stead will struggle this season, and while he may get some goals, will be nowhere as prolific as last season. although i feel this way, i still hope that i'm proven wrong! so come'on! hope the players prove me wrong! regarding the point towards pacy forwards, our lack of pace is not only obvious up front... but also in our defence... think amo and matteo or nissa... they are big... but certainly not fast... *gulp*
-
[Archived] 2004-2005 Premiership Predictions
vyeo replied to Philly Rover ®'s topic in Football Messageboard Archive
1. arsenal 2. chelsea 3. liverpool 4. manure 5. newcastle 6. middlesbrough 7. charlton 8. villa 9. birmingham 10. US! 11. spurs 12. fulham 13. southampton 14. portsmouth 15. crystal palace 16. bolton 17. west brom 18. man city 19. everton 20. norwich -
no names... but are you sure he's from burnley???
-
while i believe and hope that we do bring in a quality striker to replace cole, i doubt that it will happen. souness seems to be well chuffed with dickov, publicly praising him several times already. in fact, i suspect dickov will be given cole's number. shearer 9, sutton 9, ward 9, cole 9, dickov 9 did i miss anyone out? however, i think we might bring in another young unknown striker, and barring a totally disastrous first half of the season, that'd be it for strikers. unless dickov screws up, i don't see us bringing in anyone else. however, if he's not performing, we might bring someone in during the january window ala cole and stead. also, there is always hope for matty... should we get a matty version 01-02, it'd be like a whole new signing. and if only yorke bothers to, he can still cut it i believe. he's strong, has a good first touch and other technical abilities. as for the wages saved, i now hope that they will be used to finance a deal for butt... he'd be a good foil for fergie in the centre, rotating with tugay depending on the opposition and situation.
-
Both clubs then agreed on the basis of a deal and now all that remains is for Cole to sort out personal terms with the Cottagers today. - LET the above was the most worrying thing for me. assuming that it's a free transfer as stated in the same article, the above can only mean one thing. - we will pay part of cole's wages at fulham. either that or a swap for mcbride. personally, i'm gutted. cole looks like he's able to command about a 1m transfer fee at least, and in this case, we're paying him to go. bad bad business, all because of souness' huge ego. we better have a decent replacement lined up. if it's dickov, there's only one way we're going. down.
-
to me, it is plain and simple that this reeks of souness' own personal bias. he should be professional enough to put the CLUB, US, BLACKBURN ROVERS ahead of his personal relationship with a player. yes, coley's reporting him to the PFA was perhaps 'unprofessional', but out on the pitch, we've clearly seen him be professional enough to fight hard and perform well for the club. in cole's history, he was not on speaking terms with sheringham, but still formed a decent enough partnership with him at manure. therefore, his professionalism is proven. as for senile souness, he's proved to us time and again that once he falls out with you, you're screwed. souness is afterall, the gaffer. if we sell cole, and bring in a replacement of similar class, i'd give souness the benefit of the doubt. however, i suspect that coley will be sold, and dickov will be the replacement. if this is true, then its really a sad day for us. dickov and stead upfront, i would say, plenty of endeavour, but lacking in skill and real quality. for all of stead's goals last season, i still think he is raw, and this season, he might find it much harder to get near last season's form. come'on souey. prove us wrong.
-
if this is true, souness should be the one booted out.
-
[Archived] Chelski Transfer Madness
vyeo replied to joey_big_nose's topic in Football Messageboard Archive
agree with you 6. and just to draw a parallel to the above, remember nicola ventola? talented, quick, skillful striker who broke onto the inter scene back in the middle/late 90s as a teenager, but moratti's constant purchasing of big name strikers led to him being frozen out and let out on loan to various teams for many seasons. think it seriously hampered his progress. when he first came on, he looked like one of the brightest talents in italy. look what happened to him. -
flitty has been a wonderful servant of the club. probably no rovers fan will question his battling qualities and commitment. however, as in life, it is undeniable that we have to move on with the times. to me, this move is just that, moving on with the times. its a fact that flitty was in and out of the team after fergie was bought, and became a more regular fixture only after the latter's injury. so, in all likelihood, with a fully fit fergie, its only natural that he assumes the captaincy as flitty becomes more of a squad player. besides, with all due respect, when you have scotland's captain playing in your team, who would you choose as captain? him or an uncapped squad player? thus, appointing fergie outright makes for a more logical and correct situation. look at chelsea, where desailly was officially club captain but terry was wearing the armband most of the time. certainly, it kind of 'diminishes' the value of the captaincy doesnt it?
-
i'm not english, but was an english fan until hoddle dropped sutton back in the mid-90s. then, the only reason i supported england was because of rovers players (shearer, le saux, ripley, wilcox) being in the team. after the sutton saga, i never rooted for england again, but still followed your progress through the WC and EURO qualifiers. then, the jansen debacle, combined with a personal dislike of eriksson (he lied to us!), made me root for anyone against you... until the day another rovers player pulls on the english jersey that is. but on the topic, i caught the match live on tv in the early hours of the morning (3am), and i thought that owen's goal was a classic opportunist's strike. but eriksson's tactics of defend, defend, defend was just not on. possession was about 65% to 35% in favour of portugal, and even in the first half, they looked the more probable to score, and it was really no surprise that they eventually did. as for the substitutions, if he wanted to adopt the hoof it up option, surely heskey makes for a better choice than vassell to play as targetman? at least the size is there. at the time, i was bemused by the scholes substitution, but upon realising that it was due to an injury, fair enough. but at that stage, joe cole would have been an option too. putting phil nev in only handed the portugese the impetus to attack even more. on this point, the contrast between last night's 2 managers cannot be more stark. put it crudely, big phil has balls. everyone has to give him that. to have the guts to pull your captain, who is arguably the biggest name in your team off, and replace him with a striker who've played sporadically, and scored only 1 league goal all season against the opponents on the day, takes guts, and big phil was proven right. albeit hypothetically, it is fair that beckham is sven's first name on the sheet. and my money is on sven NOT having the balls to substitute goldenballs should he have been in the same situation. also, i thought your players looked much more sluggish than portugal's. this could be down to the fact that the team has not been rotated. whilst portugal has not rotated all its players as well, they have made their fair share of changes while england havent. players like bridge, joe cole etc havent had a kick all tournament! surely, it wouldnt have been impossible to rotate the players in my opinion. therefore, i feel that ultimately, the manager (sven) has to shoulder the blame, and for you guys to move on, another manager (preferably english) would probably be the better option. maybe then, the team will feature a rover again!
-
4eva, fully agree with ur point. he's a waste at 7m. but, if it was nearer 2-3m (possibly what's left of our entire kitty, if there is at one in the first place) it would represent a pretty good bit of business for us. that said, i do agree that we have adequate cover in midfield. priority now has to be a defender. cheers!
-
damn chuffed!!! whilst keeping my fingers crossed... and, assuming that the butt rumours are true... de pedro butt fergie emo the above could be our first choice midfield next season. certainly mouth watering. with thompson, reid, tugay and flitts competing alongside those four, i reckon we could have one of the strongest midfields in the league even... even if the butt deal doesnt happen, we're still pretty well off there... add another centre back (matteo??) and next season sounds really promising!
-
with the way leeds have conducted themselves, surely they wouldnt mind contributing the other 18k a week? hehehe but then again, if matteo doesnt accept our offer, then i wouldnt lose too much sleep over him anyway. at least we're not being held to ransom.
-
good suggestion 6! how abt 1.5m and matty + another youngster on loan? we get our man, matty gets his match practice, and i think no matter what u do in training, playing competitive league matches, albeit in a 'lesser' league should do him a world of good. sadly though, if he can't cut it there, we really can't even hope anymore... but if it works out, we get MGP, and by november, we'd have a fully fit matty as well!
-
lovely interview! thanks for the effort everyone who made this possible. personally never rated filan above tim...