I remember another save from their keeper first half which he tried to make look like a worldie (perhaps midway through the half, can't remember which Rovers player it was), and I also remember a couple of blocks by the Hull defence which were also shots on target/good chances. You can't keep citing similar promising situations that Hull had as 'chances' without giving equal credence to the ones that Rovers had.
I'm not a huge fan of stats per se, but by any measure we absolutely battered Hull last night and the only surprise is that it took us so long to actually make the breakthrough.
Striving for more is one thing, but mate you are not being fair, reasonable or rational in your analysis of what happened last night. 3-0 certainly did not flatter us and that's regardless of when the goals were scored. As one-sided a game as you could wish to see.
I appreciate that football is a game of opinions, but is everybody else really wrong and you are right?