Please explain, x1xxx- xXxx not sure what you mean, how do I roll back to IE6? I have one game on my 'puter, Call of Duty the card handles that game very well. Like I said the issue seems to be exclusively Rovers World, I spent 2 hours tonight playing streaming video's from youtube, played some of the clip I have links to, watched all kinds of news videos at Yahoo and my home page, no problems with any of those. BTW I'm not using a laptop. Well I did a little more playing around and here is what I found. I got the video to run much much better, still not as good as when I had IE6 but far better than it was. Only a few stutter rathr than the buffering every 5 seconds. What I did was to disable the tabbed browsing feature in IE7, unfortunate since that was the only reason I downloaded it. For the time being if you have IE 6 and you are ok with the performance I'd stick with it. I'd still like to know how to roll back to IE6. I had already tried restore and it did not want to know. It's almost midnight thirty so I will try again when volume is likely to be higher.

Not for me anymore, I'm miffed. I just re-upped my subscription and for some reason the Video Highlights have gone bunk. The whole site now takes forever to load and the video on high setting buffers about every 5 seconds. Whats happened everything worked fine a few week ago video delivery was smooth as silk, no buffering in high, fast loading. It's as bad (almost) as my old 233mhz. I have a cable connection, 7.5Mbps download, 128mb radeon 300se video, 512mb RAM 2.8Ghz processor. It should handle everything fine. The only other thing I have changed is to download IE7 but I can't put my finger on whether that is when things went to crap or not. All other video downloads fine, just Rovers World. Like I said it ain't worth a penny Any ideas/input from fellow members would be welcome, or even the great guru LEE could shed a little, it's very frustrating.

GAV, please clarify "leathered" I have this awful image of you trawling the red light district in Amsterdam wearing.... well you get the picture.

I have just read his e-mail and it has just confirmed my original thought it's a complete plonker, possibly borderline for some serious help in the mental health dept.

I think you are missing the point a bit my friend, I think what we have here is an extreme case of absence making the heart grow fonder. The Mods are 100% correct the person hijacked almost every bloody thread with the same anti Walker sentiment. That, I for one got well and truly sick of. Let's spare a minute to think of the mods situation. If the person had stuck to a thread or even a couple perhaps he/she could not have been banned. I too doubt he/she has any fondness in it's heart for Rovers. In fact given the fact that most dingles despise Jack because he made us bigger, better and won us stuff It would not surprise me in the least if it was one of them as others have suggested

My Hero.

Now I've picked myself up off the floor from laughing, thanks for that.

Be better spent expanding the Gene pool down the unfriendly end of the Motorway I beg to differvinjay same old rhetoric an dwhile RTM's points may not be thought out and he lied about attending the game he does vary his theme some, and I think he actually means well. I found everthing vinjay said to be criticism levelled at the Family that rescued this club without any constructive substance whatsoever. In short I found his rantings to be quite offensive in nature, at least to a fan who was there during some of the clubs darker days. It's actually not, a medium that requires registration and membership is not exactly public is it? You just want him back so you can pick on him with you intellectual superiority don't you jim. Fair do's. Then if he is re-instated someone please educate me on the ignore function or I will banish myself to the official board

So you are saying that us not finding a Billionare is down to JW and his Job preservation, nonsense. My take, if I was a Billionare buying Rovers I would likely think the man has something to offer. I think the fella has done an excellent job really. I do beleive that the fact we had Jack has made the appreciation for JW's efforts somewhat tempered.

Local hero stuff has nowt to do with it as far as I'm concerned. I simply wanted to know when he's not being used more, sub specifically. I'm as real as it gets mate.

Another worry for Spurs, R Keane hit a hat trick, surely he will be brimming with confidence. That's one player I wish we had gone for when he was on the fringe at Spurs. BTW on another Spurs note, how is the mighty Mido doing this season, for those who thought we should break the bank to get him at all costs, it's looking to me like it's money well saved

Why do you always feel the need to demean people because the have differing opinions to yours. Hey, did anyone notice any Prem clubs sniffing around Tugay or Friedal or Bentley. It is usually a good sign of ablilities, right? Dreamers and comic strip readers, really. Little sidebar here, the other day I was watching the video highlights on RW, saw Gally's goal, extremely well taken, well this comic strip reader thought so. What I found interesting though was the fact that MH looked totally ###### off after Gally scored, no smile no nothing just arms folded and a grim look on his face. What is that about?

An interesting flash back if nothing else. De Pedro?? Shows just how far this manager of ours has brought us. Let's not forget that after our 5th defeat on the bounce Sunday.

I said it when McClaren was appointed and I'll repeat myself. Forget the Euro's we are not going to qualify. In football terms I am ashamed to be English. The FA have always been plonkers when it comes to the England manager. Do a Charlton and get rid now.

To be fair, those of you who have suggested the service to him was poor, you are right.

Elaborate why he's not good enough to come on as sub please. The evidence I've seen when he does is that Rovers start to look more threatening.

Good answer

Exactly the sort of answer I asked not to get. How can one just say he is not good enough when the evidence is there for all to see. He has clearly made impacts when he has come on, not perhaps in scoring but the whole team seems to buck up, we become more lively and start to show a little imagination. So good enough or not if he does that then why not more of him and sooner. He has, in the Souness era, started and been ineffective but he always seems to do well as a sub. I also think Sparky is man enough not to show preferencial treatment to HIS signings, if that was the case how the hell do you explain MGP playing all the time whenhe has been crap.

Dependant on the time of Month I'm sure.

Mine too, well I was split between him and Nigel Worthington. Bloody good job I'm not running things down at Ewood.

Respected me? Why how flattering. Perhaps some of it is I will usually defer to the people that actually attend the games, somefolks however prefer to get on their soap box arguing their opinions as fact without any thing to really back it up. Bloody hell, Danns and Douglas come of it or is RTM actually Souness? My question was quite simple I don't think I've seen a realistic answer yet.

I am becoming a little puzzled at the Gally situation. Okay okay I have not seen him as much as lots of you BUT, when I have seen him he has come on and has made a genuine impact. We have created more, wehave attacked more and created more chances. What's going on, IMHO the lad has earned a shot, or am I missing something Don't just tell me "he's not prem standard" either, I want something of substance, some examples of him not performing when he has come on to justify him not getting a go. Anyone?

On the contrary Rev, I thought there was plenty of movement of the front two, it just was not effective movement. Very unintelligent running. They moved to where the passing lanes were effectively closed off. Also to add did anyone else notice the game seem to turn after Benni got booked. We seemed to adopt the bully boy bit again and I had thought just prior to that we had played some of our better footy, we seemd to switch after that incident. And just a moan, Riley let an awful lot go for United in defence, several obstructions, fouls and holding and pushing. Not using it as an excuse but he seemed bound and determined not to let us have a free kick in any sort of danger area. Just my observation. Not saying Benni did not deserve the booking either BUT how many times do we see encroachment, just how many refs pull up for it let alone book people.

Did not know he was on the pitch yesterday till he was subbed

Toothless up front. Lacking in ideas, through the middle is not the way to get to the Mancs. As for Benni, some nice skill bit does not chase the ball. Why Oh why he will not move toward the ball is beyond me, it s one of the first tings we are taught is it not. Nonda?? was he playing. There were a few positives yes, I thought at times our defending looked a lot better I'm sure that has to do with Emo. Ooyah IMO is beginning to look a real class act, I can't wait to see him play with Nelsen. Hold on to your hats lads and lassies only one ,more defeat next week and we should start to get some results on the board. Sparky needs to sub sooner when we are chasing the game, I was very dissappointed not to see Gally, something afoot there cos whenever I have seen him come on he's had an impact, Sparky sees different. Why was Bentley subbed was it tactical or injury or just trying not to wear him out.