Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

RoverDom

Members
  • Posts

    4483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by RoverDom

  1. I'm not buying the whole mane thing. There were times when he was benched or at afcon and they still rolled teams over. 

    Nunez I think could come good, trouble is I don't think they're playing to his strengths  but I feel like when it clicks he could bang in a few. 

     

    FA are apparently investigating Henderson racially abusing Gabriel. I'd be very surprised if there was any truth in that whatsoever. John Terry, Suarez etc you can fully beleive it could happen but not Henderson. 

    • Like 1
  2. 30 minutes ago, roverandout said:

    As Simon Jordan on TalkSport said maybe the reason why trent plays regularly for Liverpool and not England is being Liverpool don't have the depth of talent England has at rightback.  Had Liverpool got other viable options in that position, then maybe trent wouldn't play in some of the bigger games 

    If it was a weak spot I'm sure they would have addressed it by now - atleast bought decent cover. Maybe the more defensively minded Gomez would have played there more often. I'm sure if Klopp thought trippier was better, he could have gone and got him over the years. It's all too easy to point out the times he's missed a header or not put a foot in and then ignore the moments of brilliance where he's unlocked teams with audacious passes. I'd say Liverpool are still in profit from him. 

  3. I'm a Southgate fan but one thing that does bug me is a reluctance to try anyone else. I can see the benefit of playing your preferred team so that they get minutes playing together but at the same time I'm sick of seeing Kane get 90 mins in meaningless games.

    • Like 2
  4. 16 minutes ago, roverandout said:

    Kane might not be as pleasing on the eye but hes a proven tournament scorer unlike Owen or Rooney 

    I think this is my point, I'd take Owen and Rooney over Kane (just) - but Kane has outperformed both by a long stretch on the international stage. Same with most of the 11, I'd take 04 over the current squad (mostly) on paper but the current crop have outperformed 04 by a mile and Gareth has to take credit for that. 

    • Like 1
  5. 9 minutes ago, roverandout said:

    I would say current keeper is far better. Kane is better than Owen or Rooney.  Rightback options much better. We had a world class team back then but they didn't have the passion to play for England like these players do

    Right back yes and keeper is probably better. Kane vs Owen / Rooney in their prime - I'd take Owen at his best and I'd take and 18-20 year old Rooney over Kane. 

    • Like 1
  6. 5 minutes ago, K-Hod said:

    Since the Euros final, for me we’ve been going backwards and IMO, Southgate has run his course. 

    The majority of the squad had a shocking season for their club after the Euros final. Southgate cant carry the blame for that. Faultless? No. Time for a change? No. 

    I would have waited till after this WC to give him a new contract though

  7. It's certainly no surprise to anyone that BRFCS is one of the most negative football forums out there? If a player misplaces a pass he's written off and Rovers relegated to conference North. 

     

    England are in a rough patch but in international football you judge the team on how they perform at tournaments. This squad and manager have out performed any in my lifetime and the counter arguments to that are 

    1. Look at the players he's had at his disposal - on paper I'd have the euro 04 squad with maybe Kane being the only one in contention to break into the squad. 

    2. Look at the runs he's had - we had to get past Germany in the knockouts rather than Iceland in 2016

    The quality of player we have available has surely been overhyped as well and as someone else said Gareth does well at making the whole better than the sum of its parts. Half the squad get pillared week in week out for their club by English press and fans, yet are suddenly considered world class and expected to walk every tournament going when on international duty 

  8. I'd stay with 3 at the back, gives us some defensive cover where we've been weak for years. Gives the opportunity to get TAA in the side who's attacking output could be crucial but is defensively weak. He can get  away with it in a 4 at Liverpool (although is being called out a bit now) but not with England. Bellingham and Rice as the midfield two is a better option than rice and Phillips as well. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.