I understand what you are saying but ultimately 6/7 wins and a 2/3 draws out of the last 13 games will do it. 73 points is the average needed to get in the playoffs. We need 1.8pts a game so technically 5pts every three games is enough. So the margin for error is bigger than you think. It would be ideal to pick up 3 of those wins this week but statistically we could lose three on the bounce, draw the next three (so no win in 6) and then win five on the bounce and still be in with a shot of the playoffs going into the last two games.

I think Bennett’s legs have gone you know. For what it’s worth I often advocated his inclusion last season. He worked the hardest and gave the most. BUT this season I think there’s been a notable drop in his physical attributes. He looks tired more and has lost a yard of pace when he didn’t have a yard in the first place. Nyambe has finished him and I expect him to be used sparingly for the rest of the season. Him starting vs Hull and then being dragged with Graham at 60 mins in a game where the subs came on and changed the course, for me signalled the end for both. Cant see DG being here next season. SG is his natural successor. I’d be tempted to see how Samuel does and offer him a year to fight for a spot. I think Bennett will stay but be used VERY sparingly next season.

I would say 4pts from those three games as a minimum. 6pts would be very good. 7pts amazing and 9pts = Me booking my accommodation and train for May! ??

There’s people coming on here hours after a 0-2 away win in the current circs demanding they manager be removed. TBH it wasn’t the term I wanted to use for them. But ultimately if I choose not to interact with them because I believe they care about their own agenda more than the club then that’s my prerogative.

Nope, they were posts from someone who doesn’t personally know the attendees at the meeting. (Mowbray, Waggot and Cheston). As I’ve stated openly on many occasions. So if my being appreciative to @J*B for the opportunity and being respectful of the attendees / cautious of what I said afterwards = ‘star struck’ then I’m happy to be so. In fairness, I privately told most of those who I wanted to and left out the ones who I think have negative agendas.

Top one. 100%. Del is decent at cb. Any word on likely length of injury?

I’m guessing ‘we’ do bearing in mind that ‘we’ have been working hard to galvanise, motivate and coach our second string plus a few U23’s to try to win a game every three days and stay within 3pts of the playoffs since December. ??‍♂️

I said in the summer (May) that the decision had been made to move Mulgrew, Smallwood and Graham out of the team. They had been told and the likes of Evans and Benno were also told that they needed to pick up their game to stay in the team which was going to evolve into a more technical based outfit. The manager later came out publicly and stated the same. He’s stuck to his guns and the team are now playing how he wanted them to. If only we had Dack, Holtby and Evans fit now. I’d really fancy us going into those last 13 games. Did I read somewhere that 7 wins will probably do it? If so then the season doesn’t hang on Saturday though a positive result would keep up the momentum.

Tosin....what a name!!

I’m not sure mate, Rothwell is very talented but at times can be an enigma. I think us getting the 6/7 more wins to get us into that top 6 will depend on whether we can keep the back 5 plus Trav, Arma and Downing fit. The defensive improvement from the signings of Tosin, Walton and briefly Cunningham as well as the progress of Nyambe who has improved dramatically since last season is giving us the platform. Meanwhile our pattern of play appears to be working in forward areas. Regardless of who is picked.

He obviously has spent some of those resources quite well or we wouldn’t be winning games like yesterday with the likes of Walton, Armstrong, Samuel, Johnson and Downing starring! Fyi - all this with our best three creative players (all signed by Mowbray) currently injured.

Ahhh the irony. So it makes you “sick” when you read references to haters? The post above yours following a 0-2 away win, 3pts off the playoffs, best points tally at this stage, most clean sheets etc is the EPITOME of hate. I think the recent form in spite of the injuries has done a bloody wonderful job of separating supporters vs haters with agendas. Many Doubters (including myself) are happy to put our hands up and say ‘fair enough’ the manager is doing some job to keep us in this position with the injuries. Whilst others are working tirelessly to prove their point. The “I think we’re winning in spite of Mowbray” one is particularly amusing to me! ??

They see him as a Silva type of player too. Plays on the half turn and very technical intelligent and mentally strong apparently. He’s seen as ‘the one’...he won’t be loaned out to league one for the same reasons City wouldn’t loan Foden out. Neither need to ‘man up’ they just need nurturing and to grow. Not get their legs broken in a league where they are mentally three steps ahead of everyone else. Interestingly - City will need another ‘Silva’ type player to replace Foden when he replaces Silva in the summer....

If he’s good enough then he won’t need to be as physical. Though there’s not many lads at 20 who’ve finished growing into their bodies so fingers crossed he puts a bit of weight on between now and August. Could be a massive player for us in the future.

Unfortunately I wasn’t there yesterday mate but I’ve seen the last few and yes I’d agree. I do think that perhaps it’s because the lads who’ve come in have had longer to understand though. We played a couple of matches with Dack and Holtby in those tucked in forward roles and couldn’t get it right. Rothwell has also played there. So we could prob argue that those three are better placed than most. But whatever ambiguity there is, I’m clear that Sam Gallagher cannot and must not play that role. EVER again! ??

Tbf I think the shape and tactics are exactly the same. A ball playing CB, Two sitting CM’s, inverted wide players and full backs pushing on and creating the width. It’s just now that it seems to be finally working and the biggest indicator for me is that AA can play as a lone striker for us now. There’s not a chance he could’ve done that for us last May because we were so direct.

Got to be honest, whenever I watch him I can’t help thinking there’s a player in there but he does drift in and out of games. Thanks for the info, much appreciated.

I’d just got home, scanned the thread and there was nothing comprehensive about Buckley. Most opinions on those I read were about Walton, Samuel and Johnson. If he had read my reply to the two lads who actually gave some feedback before droning on in spite of the truth.

The club (coaches / players etc) know when scouts are in attendance and who they’re in attendance for. ”They keep coming back to see him but it’d take 8 figures to get him. They know that” You don’t need to be playing every week for these clubs to pay 8 figures. They’ll pay that for U23’s if they see the potential. Which apparently they do. Just because you don’t understand something doesn’t make it false.

Wtf are you going on about!? I didn’t go to the game, saw he’d scored a goal and wondered how he’d done overall. Plus I never said he was worth £20m! I said in December that I knew (fact) that there were / are massive PL clubs watching him and that I wouldn’t be surprised if one made an 8 figure bid for him. There was no debate to be had with you or anyone. What is absolutely ridiculous is how paranoid and bitter you are. Even when your team wins. Embarrassing.

Thanks. I hope he gets a run. He’s the most likely of the young lads to open a team up. Needs to effect the games he plays with assists / goals because that’s his real value. Happy for him.

Can anyone tell me how Bucko did today?

No correlation at all. One is their desire to spend their money. The other is their ability to find the best manager. I also stated clearly that it was not the only (isolated) reason. I just said that Venkys inability to find great managers was a valid consideration when deciding whether to bullet a manager who statistically HAS taken us forward even though it’s not been as quickly as we would like.

No Stuey, you don’t have to wait for me or anyone else. As I’ve said you (and everyone else) is more than welcome to your opinion. For what seems like 20th time - My point was in relation to those aghast that fans aren’t keen on rolling the Venkys dice for another manager when this one is doing well enough (right now at least when looking at the stats). Just an attempt at a discussion and some context around a pretty common theme on here. In relation to the runs, I think they’re pretty common place in the championship. Mainly because of how competitive it is. That said, if we could prevent them it would help us to kick on. Mediocrity is being happy with finishing mid table on a mid table budget. Nobody wants that. The manager, the club, players or the fans. Based on your argument, should we finish in or just outside of the playoffs then I’d imagine you’d have to be looking at a 180 on Mowbray. Mid table won’t be good enough for me either. But then my stance is that I have serious misgivings as to whether TM can overachieve.

I’m fully aware (as stated) that this cannot be judged until May. HOWEVER.....we are currently debating the ‘progress’ of the manager / team as of today, which is impossible to do unless we look at where we are right now. I’m not talking about after the home win and I’m not pushing any positive spin on anything. I’m simply saying that as we sit here, today the stats would suggest that we have progressed since last season. Fewer goals conceded, more points, more clean sheets etc etc. The end of the season will provide us with the final judgement of course.