What did he have for his tea last night? 🙂

That's what I'd do - play those 3 in the middle to stiffen things up.

The players on the pitch last night have more than enough about them ability wise to have got a result.

The only thing that stands out about our team at the moment, is our penchant for losing football matches.

Tomasson has enough about him to keep our heads above water. Another shit month though, and the 10 point cushion could then be 5. But then it's too late to do much about it.

Stop eating all that Christmas cheese 🙂

Absolutely clueless.

We've played pretty well and deserve that. Whether we gift them another is the worry.

Get In

FFS

What have the cutbacks got to do with us having a policy of signing, or not signing, anyone over the age of 25?

Then why - if we believe what we're being told that he has the final say-so on transfers - did he do so?

I'd be hard pressed to believe that anyone with any semblence of judgement would have signed Telalovic, whether that be Broughton, Tomasson, or a combination of both.

It's on Rovers TV

Aye OK.

How do you know he only gets young players to sign off on? The evidence, as quoted, suggests otherwise. Venkys are clueless, we all know that. But you haven't grasped the fact that despite this, some of the blame for our poor results is on Tomasson for his tactics, and on Broughton and Tomasson for between them signing poor players. Are you mates with Chaddy by any chance?

My angle is this. The argument that we only sign players over a certain age has been dispelled (Tronstad, Szmodics) So if Tomasson does indeed have influence on who we sign, but those players are young/inexperienced, then he needs to stop using 'inexperience' as an excuse every time we get beat. That was my original point. Not so strange after all eh? I think you're trying to avert any blame whatsover on our poor results from Tomasson. No offence like. And I'm perfectly aware what the bigger picture is, thanks all the same.

So we sign players then without Tomassons say-so, yes?

Having no players is not a transfer policy. It's having no money in the first place. My question is rather about the players we actually do sign, and whether he is on board with those.

Tronstad got sanctioned - he's 28.

In your opinion then, Tomasson isn't on board with the transfer policy?

Because he's still here collecting his salary.

If the rumour is true, then I suspect that we'll be shipping someone out, probably Carter, and looking to make a trading profit on the face of things. I think Sam Barnes' contract is up in June also.

Indeed we did. It still provided endless amusement though.

If it is what the club want and Tomasson is on board with it, then the 'inexperience' excuses need to stop when we lose.