Despite signing 10,only 3 new players started on Saturday. Obviously injuries and suspensions will be a factor, but it will be interesting going forward to see how that changes. It will maybe be a good indication of just how successful the window was.
I'm more intrigued than anything, beyond Dolan and Britain, can't say I'm too fussed about the ones who've left.
Aye, he did well. I was meaning the overall amount of Championship experience which we've lost, and brought foreign players in.
it was a major topic throughout the window.
I'm struggling to know what your point is.
If they wanted to renew contracts, they could've done, they just chose not to . The other argument would be whose decision was it?
Showing the "ability", or knowhow to physically draw up a contract, new or otherwise.
They're quite capable of drawing up a contract, if it's to their liking.
You keep on saying it's inability when it clearly isn't.
I've never once said they're no good, but it's obvious what has happened/is happening and you just keep on yearning for something which clearly isn't going to happen.
As I've been saying for weeks, whether the new process works depends almost solely on how good the recruitment department is . They've got a lot on.
It isn't inability, they've just signed 10 players, they're more than capable of penning contracts, it's choice.
I'd rather they'd kept Dolan in particular, and Britain, although I can't say I let it "worry" me when it's so obvious what's happening.
If the personnel and makeup of the club hadn't changed it would be more of a worry.
The pattern will change when it comes to renewing the more recently signed players.
They're not going to re sign players on contracts they don't agree with.
They were always signing Baradji, and Travis, by his own admission, wasn't offered a contract. That sorts that out.
Hyam, I agree with you regarding the timing , but if it wasn't too good to turn down, why didn't they turn it down ?