M_B

I honestly don't oppose the boycott, people can do whatever they feel is right. It does make me wonder though, why it has taken an official one for people to act,i mean come on, they've had 15 years. Also how it is now being seen as some cliff edge, do or die moment, and if you don't comply(not saying that the coalition have said this) you are somehow responsible for the ills at the club. It's absolutely ridiculous. You're right, I obviously do wish they'd go, but I don't think for one second that they'll be forced into it. The result of what's happening, in my opinion, is much more likely to result in a statement confirming their intentions to stay, rather than an intention to leave. If that does happen, you can guarantee that the boycott hasn't helped, quite the opposite.

It doesn't make me or anyone else complicit, stop peddling this ridiculous rhetoric , how old are you?

I explained it in a reply to TugaysMarlboro, there are 2 posts

Don't try to turn this on its head, we both know how this goes.

I've replied to TugaysMarlboro on p16 with the suggestion.

Look, just because a few people who I don't know have come up with an idea doesn't mean it becomes gospel. Who are they to call it "Official" anyway ??? They didn't ask my opinion, did they ask yours? Tell you what, the boycott is OFFICIALLY OFF and everyone has to attend the Watford match. There you go, 25000 crowd against Watford coming up, don't forget, you have to turn up because it's OFFICIAL because I said so.

On the contrary, I've just posted an idea. Just because it isn't your idea doesn't mean it's wrong.

I'd just add, there were a lot of comments on here about the number of absentees at the Leicester game last night. Imagine if there was a visual show of frustration, running alongside the boycott, from the ones who actually attended.

I'll definitely be attending, and everyone I've asked, and there's been a few, is also going. That's not to say I'm happy with what is happening at the club. The way this has been organised has become extremely divisive, it's being portrayed as some do or die cliff edge moment when we all know it's anything but, and the ridiculous rhetoric will only be ramped up even more as next weekend approaches. It should be obvious to anyone that most will still attend, a lot won't even know about the "boycott". Rather than attempt to drive a wedge between the two factions, which was an obvious consequence of the whole idea, if there was a visual protest inside the ground to run alongside the number staying away, it would have been a way to unite the whole thing, holding up a red card at a certain time for example. The whole boycott thing is riddled with contractions, but I could get on board with showing frustrations within the ground.

I know what it's about, but I said if you want a true reflection. As I've said before, if you weren't going anyway, it isn't boycotting, it's just not going.

Not really, not if you want a true reflection.

I didn't get that from his interview on the way home, he was obviously asked about the injury situation and he gave answers to the questions. His usual answer I've heard is that it opens the door for someone else. It's obviously going to be a topic of conversation when it's such a long list of absentees. To think otherwise would be strange.

Apparently, again according to someone the other day, the deal is sealed, it's in the club's hands, it's up to Rovers whether or not it happens.

Don't think that's possible according to someone the other day

Just watched the highlights, he actually won the ball back leading to our attack for the first goal as well.