chaddyrovers

The fact of matter is I think Anderson is much better suited to playing the number 6 (defensive midfielder) role under Tuchel and how he wants that role played. You prefer Wharton. Fair enough and different opinions is good. I did say I think Wharton would have better playing the 8 role(box to box midfielder) cos he could have played the final passes and find more thought balls.

Zinedine Zidane described Paul Scholes as one of the greatest midfielders of his generation, the "complete midfielder," and his toughest opponent, as reported Zidane reveals Scholes regrets | FourFourTwo https://share.google/mr870LX7mscjyTGHr

None but still nominated 5 times for him so your first point was factual incorrect He was great player. Take those tinted glass off

He was nominated 5 times for Ballon D'or

Knew about Anderson years ago. Very highly rated by Howe and Newcastle was forced to sell him to met FFP ruled Scholes was a world class player.. Wharton isn't anyway near his level. Maybe one day

Eh? Anderson had been highly rated for years. Its what best for the England team not about Rovers

We just have agree to disagree cos we aren't going to agree one bit What are going on about now? Fairly ordinary player??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Based on what? No-one is reliant on them but used it to back people opinion that Anderson is better suited to playing the number 6 (defensive midfielder) role than Wharton at this stage plus how Tuchel wants that role played and how the team play

Laughable comment. Scholes is one of best midfielder going ever in the PL. Take their Wharton's tinted glasses off

Nothing on line. Dont agree. Given that in my opinion we have only 3 spots in the starting 11 open and 2 of them are the positions that Bellingham and Eze played yesterday. Burn is a steady player but a squad player at best

Sorry, They were 3 points to play for, players given a chance to shine and against a tactic used by Albania that many teams will played against us. Bellingham was awful, Eze not good enough, Burn made mistakes, etc Cos Anderson was more effective than Wharton was as I said and I also said that I feel Wharton would be better playing higher up the pitch. I have said and others have said similar that Anderson is actually more suited to playing that 6 role(defensive midfielder) cos how Tuchel wants that role played but also how we play overall isn't he first in forward passes, or touches or line breaking passes or successful dribbles or progressive carries or Possession won then? I must have none seen that on Sky Sports PL channel before the Sunday games started.

these stats shown in those 6 categories he was ranked number 1 in every one which would say he has been the best in those areas of the game. Anderson has been very good this season and he has been in England shirt just like he was last season and for the England under 21's tournament which we won

Bellingham and Eze were poor but somehow Bellingham was man of the match according to the poll online with the England FA of course it matter, its a quality game and result and performance matter. Tuchel tried a different tactical approach first half. Not keen on that. Anderson was more effective in the 6 role(defensive midfielder) than Wharton was. Albania was well organised, solid and difficult to break down, something we face in the world cup so this was a good test for us, I fed up with you writing off these types of games at every opportunity you get. Why shouldn't take any significant Conclusions from yesterday?

or you could learn them and understand it but for clarity I will do both now.