I really like Simon Jordan and agree with him the vast majority of the time but think he's wide of the mark there.

I disagree they were signings of the right sort of quality.

That banner is very impressive. How about crowdfunding a production run so people could put these in the windows of their houses/shops/cars etc. ? Got to start somewhere. The real key might be embarrassing the owners back in India. Any feasible methods come to light yet?

Ok, thanks for that, I still cant see that they would be micromanaging every single decision from India but it seems fairly clear that in overall terms we're running an exceptionally tight financial ship. We seem to be operating transfers on a one in one out basis, players going out on loan before another comes in etc, 20 k p.w. striker only coming in on loan at the last minute on the basis we ship out 17/18k p.w. Sigurdsson etc etc. Any promises made regarding funding havent been met to date and its difficult to see that changing no matter what is said.

Id imagine they have an annual budget and that 95% of decisions which fall within the budget are made in house. It'll only be when unusual expenditure outside the budget for a transfer window is needed or when something out of the ordinary crops up like the manager threatning to leave that they get consulted Id wager.

Indeed we will. To answer one of your other questions I dont know if Ive been calling for it as long as you, but for the last few months Ive been saying that Eustace needed to be given an improved deal and it was more important than any signings we could make in the transfer window.

He used to rent a house on Beardwood. No idea if he still does.

Exactly so. We should be a magnet for all the best young talent in the NW. Lot easier to break into our side than City/Liverpool/ManUre etc

I wouldnt put it past Waggott to have another crack at doing that at some point. Then when thats been done, most of the senior players have walked out and Carter's been sold, what advantage is there in putting the Club up for sale as opposed to into administration other than not losing face back in India?

Nothing like that in real terms. When the last attempt to sell Brockhall was made I think the figures were it cost £3.2m to run but we got a grant of £1.9m towards the running of it. A bargain in relative terms you'd imagine most regimes would think.

I cant see the difference from their point of view. Realistically to offload control they're going to have to write off the debt due to themselves and more or less give the Club away anyhow. (Unless we get promoted)

Problem with that is, technically they arent doing anything wrong. Players and major creditors have been paid (to date) etc etc

Tom Finn would do.

Why not if at some point a bit further down the line they are still losing money and there's no further funds to be squeezed out of player sales, a sale of the other bit of Brockhall etc?

Or they give him a new three and a half year contract. (Think a pig just flew past the window)

What do you think?

I dont think the Court proceedings have any actual effect on us now but back when Waggott gave the infamous "coach" interview they were very much affecting us and seemingly changed their stance and attitude on us for good. It does feel like we're moving (very slowly) towards some kind of end game and I suspect it's going to be tortuous in the meantime.

There's no sense in letting them walk out for nothing though under any scenario unless they've calculated that overall it would be cheaper than giving them an extended contract on an increased salary.

Thats the problem supporters groups who have wanted to help in the past have faced.

Just read the second half of that sentence back to yourself and see how unlikely it sounds.

They're currently providing the level of investment it takes to get out of the League all right. Just not at the right end.

Maybe it's more likely they're trying to eke out the last remaining drops of value from player sales before placing the Club up for sale or into administration. We're likely to have to suffer for a while longer yet though.

It doesnt prevent any money being sent. They're not sending money over because they seemingly dont WANT to provide personal guarantees for any money sent. Doesnt even involve them in any extra expenditure as long as they dont do anything else wrong.

Think he means they might try but at this stage it'd fall on deaf ears. I doubt we'll even genuinely try. "Lets get that £750k in".

They held JDT to his contract for a long while when he clearly wasnt happy and it was only when he mentioned Pasha publically and was clearly about to let rip on the Mcguire debacle that it seemed to be the straw that broke the camel's back. I dont think they'd have any qualms about keeping Eustace here for a few days even if they knew he was leaving.