Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Andy

Members
  • Posts

    4415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Andy last won the day on September 16 2023

Andy had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Location
    Blackburn

ST

  • Season Ticket Stand
    JW

Recent Profile Visitors

10580 profile views

Andy's Achievements

Champions League

Champions League (8/9)

  • Great Content Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • One week done
  • 28 Days Later
  • Week Streak Rare

Recent Badges

6.1k

Reputation

  1. But in argument: he's not Aynsley Pears.
  2. We faced 3 shots on target yesterday - there is literally zero chance that Pears saves all 3. And that's not counting the 'fingertip save' onto the underside of the bar, as claimed by the Rovers social media team. Personally I'd stick Michalski in and let him finish the season for us, but Toth is several levels better than Pears, so it's better than sticking with Calamity. Hopefully he's played his last game for us.
  3. Jesus, has the lad shagged your wife or something? Flapped at a couple, but had safe hands otherwise - came for a few crosses that Pears wouldn't have had a clue how to handle. Save at the death was good also. A thousand times better than Calamity.
  4. Pears out / Toth in, win and a clean sheet away from home. Thought we defended well, Yuki took his goal well. Luton are absolutely shite.
  5. Literally speaking, correct. But Pears has been (rightly) targeted as the weak point in our side by most opposition this season - and it's paid off for them (early goals / etc).
  6. We finally drop Calamity Pears (injury my arse) and we don't concede in the first few minutes. In fact, a clean sheet at HT. Almost like it's a coincidence.
  7. Does anyone actually give any credence to anything that joker Nixon says?
  8. I genuinely refuse to believe that either Toth or Michalski would be performing worse than Pears. He's consistently atrocious, costs us goals/games and is - understandably so - targeted by opposition as our weak point in the team. Persevering with him, when he's so detrimental to the team, is mind boggling.
  9. Waggott should perhaps be reminded that it's impossible to be sued for telling the truth.
  10. Too many insiders. However, it does seem as though the owners have been intentionally kept in the dark and/or have neglectfully left SP with full autonomy to run the whole club. You would hope that this information and his blatant abuse of power / lack of competency in role will get back to them. It would seem that he's the root of all evil - as well as being the one constant - as far as what's wrong with the club.
  11. From the information and who it resolves around, you'd suspect that comes either directly from JE, or somebody with close links to him. Also, I've been (mentally) calling you Irac. Today I learned that it's just 'Carl' backwards.
  12. What is quite interesting is that we're seeing a lot of leaks of legitimate information - and this has ramped up recently. Certainly members of the backroom staff want to get certain points across. I'm still joining the dots at the minute, but we have the opposite of a united camp within the club.
  13. I said the same when I drove past earlier today. They seemingly jet washed the area near to the away ticket office, but the rest of the stadium looks like the inside of a neglected fish tank.
  14. I'll be somewhere over the Atlantic in a metal bird when this game takes place - which, under normal circumstances, I'd be a bit gutted about. But, quite frankly, it'll be nice to forget it's even happening. We know it'll be more of the same; we know Pears will play, we know Sheffield will get an early goal and we know things will go from bad to worse. All while Ismael stands gormless on the sideline and the 3 stooges are gormless in the stands.
  15. With the right people running the club, with the right intentions, we will see at least double the crowds we've been getting. With the right people running the club, we would not haemorrhaging money. Suggesting that Glen has some kind of underhand agenda is both bizarre and outs you as a Venky's stooge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.