roversfan99

What would it do? A journalist who is banned criticising the club wont make one jot of difference.

The only reason it keeps coming back up is because people like you keep questioning me on it. I haven't said that Mercer has done anything wrong and indeed said fair play to him for knowing that someone had signed.

Pathetic, pitiful display yet again. Tronstad was the only player for us that resembled a Championship standard player. Nice to see Jorgensen score but I didnt see the quick forward that was suggested. Very slow and very weak, constantly losing the ball. Baradji an absolute liability again, constantly losing the ball and not someone you want in the trenches with you, bone idle. Ohashi again nowhere near good enough. O'Riordan miles away from the standard. Gardner Hickman and McLoughlin again showed why they had become surplus to requirements at previous clubs. Powell with a nice assist but physically isnt ready to compete with Championship players. Doherty anonymous. Not fair to keep throwing all of these kids together.

I am unsure why you (and others) are getting so precious about what I have said. I am not criticising you, I said fair play for knowing that a signing was imminent, but without knowing the name, that its hardly a massive scoop. Ismael said pre match that Cantwell was injured.

Frightening.

He was indeed spot on in that we were signing a player. Fair play. He just didnt know who the player was, which is fine. Its nothing to do with any supposed disagreements in the past. I am not saying that he has done anything wrong or deserves any criticism.

Spot on regarding the timing. But without a name hardly qualifies as a big scoop.

But surely the players name/identity is quite important in getting a story/scoop. Not just me being pedantic.

Its not sniping, I literally asked for some detail as to who he was referring to. He didnt get Jorgensen before anyone else. He never once specfied his name.

But without even a name, its totally worthless "information" surely.

Think hes been fit for quite a few weeks and playing in the under 21s.

I think sadly such a hope is a forlorn one.

I think it was said earlier today that the plan for Carter would be to start at 45 minutes for the under 21s and build him up from there. If indeed he actually manages to get to the end of that very small journey up to 90 minutes in the under 21s.

I can understand not revealing the "source" but not the player. Saying that we want an unnamed loanee but he might also stay or go elsewhere is a pretty easy stab in the dark to make.

Will a name be forthcoming for this supposed target?