How am I biased against England?
You are getting carried away having beaten 2 sides that didnt even qualify for the Euros. Many of the players in the current squad are either average or have barely emerged into their current team. They are just making up the numbers because of a mixture of fitness concerns and the lack of importance that can be attributed to the nations league.
But the thing is, the current team and squad isnt anything like the side that would be playing if the game had anything riding on it anyway so it doesnt need to be a case of loads of potential new ready made starters are now here off the back of these fairly meaningless games. Saka, Rice, Alexander Arnold Palmer, Foden, Stones, Mainoo and whoever else will all come straight back either into the starting 11 or at least come on as sub. Shaw too if he is ever fit again Even some of the more likely squad players like Konsa will leap above average joes like Harwood Bellis. If we had a fully fit squad and a tournament tomorrow I would suggest that more than half of the current squad wouldnt make it.
The problem is youve made massive sweeping conclusions off these games. How can Madueke be considered anywhere near Sakas level? How can you possibly say based on 2 games that Gallagher has massively improved after about 10 games at a new club? How can you be so confident in Hall solving the left back issue after 24 club starts?
I have never said anything about hating being English so that obviously isnt at me. But under age groups dont necessarily determine senior winners and weve heard all the rubbish about something special before with a golden generation that player for player was stronger. Until we actually win a tournament then it perhaps needs to be parked.