roversfan99
Members-
Posts
25464 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
107
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Uncouth Garb - The BRFCS Store
Everything posted by roversfan99
-
v Ipswich Town (h) - Good Friday, 29/3/24, 17:30
roversfan99 replied to philipl's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Im not sure you are particularly positive yourself hence celebrating draws at home v fellow strugglers! -
Venky’s v Indian Government (a)
roversfan99 replied to tomphil's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
That statement isn't worth the time it took to be cobbled together. To say we have always been supported by the owners in any way is laughable. -
v Ipswich Town (h) - Good Friday, 29/3/24, 17:30
roversfan99 replied to philipl's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
If we would lose 99 times out of 100 to any teams in the league in your opinion, whats the difference to being in the Prem, bar that we are getting beat by average players instead of world class? Surely you would prefer us to get relegated so we wont be playing against anyone who we wont be competitive with? I get why anyone would be pessimistic about our prospects, we havent won a game yet under Eustace, our record over the last few months is embarassing. So talk of people needing to lose a defeatist mentality and believe in them blindly is naive in the extreme. But I cannot fathom why anyonrle would say they would be happy to lose as long as we dont get tonked. Nor can I understand your reluctance for us to be a Premier League team. -
Venky’s v Indian Government (a)
roversfan99 replied to tomphil's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Its a very specific theory you have conjured up. More likely, there isnt (even prior to restrictions) an open chequebook to spend as much as is possible. -
v Ipswich Town (h) - Good Friday, 29/3/24, 17:30
roversfan99 replied to philipl's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Havent you always been disturbed by a potential season in the Prem due to a potential lack of competitiveness? Yet in the Championship you are happy to lose to Southampton and Ipswich at home (2 of only 8 games left and of only 4 at home) as long as we dont get hammered. -
Venky’s v Indian Government (a)
roversfan99 replied to tomphil's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Them being committed to investing the maximum they can under FFP is an absolute myth. Example, their repeated refusal to relay the pitch fully and to adequately maintain the ground, neither of which falls under FFP. -
John Eustace - our head coach
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Tomasson now being criticised for poor results against lower teams? The king is dead, long live the king. -
John Eustace - our head coach
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Those seasons sometimes included teams with points deductions. -
They do deserve and they do get plenty of criticism. But they are not THE problem nor are any of the incompetent staff hired in the last 13 years. Its bizarre that anyone would continiously want to specifically focus away from the owners.
-
Rovers Rumours & Speculation
roversfan99 replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Nixon doing his usual trick. Spending every week outside a transfer window adding a new supposedly interested team in a player we know will likely be sold, an easy article for any idiots who pay their hard earned money to have access to his weekly nonsense. Come the summer, he will go to one of the then considerable list of supposedly interested clubs, then he will pat himself on the back and his disciples will point out how he broke the story first. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
We certainly would be worse off with Telalovic in the team. Gallagher did pretty well yesterday, some good work getting other players into good positions, Szmodics had one shot saved from his hold up and got in on 2 or 3 other occassions through Gallagher only to dither and fail to take full advantage on a rare off day for him. Gallagher also had a powerful shot well saved in the second half. Had we sold him, none of the money would have been made available to do this straight swap, if £22m of Wharton money couldn't be touched due to the owners, a couple of extra million in the owners back pocket wouldn't have been either. A functional set of owners might have allowed a Gallagher sale and then a few million to be spent on a couple of strikers, but here we are. -
v Ipswich Town (h) - Good Friday, 29/3/24, 17:30
roversfan99 replied to philipl's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Did we thrive against the big teams who liked to attack us? Against the top 4, we lost all 4 and conceded 14. "We might avoid defeat." Not an ideal mindset considering we finished 7th last season, Ipswich were in League 1, shows how far in opposite directions both sides have gone. We are at home and we need wins but as it is, it seems a small chance. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
For 200k, I think hes been a shrewd addition overall at that price. Youll more often than not get far worse for that amount. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
The only good one really. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Eustace said we were "outstanding on and off the ball" post match. Obviously a pinch of salt needed as its obviously partly aimed to motivate but whilst we were well set up off the ball, on the ball we certainly weren't outstanding. We gave the ball away quite a lot and didn't create much in the way of clear cut opportunities. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Im pretty sure that even Haaland wouldn't "likely" score from a ball curled up high in the air 25-30 yards from goal, slightly wide and with a defender not too far away. Hardly on a plate, was a good pass but to bring that down, run on and finish is low percentage stuff for anyone. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Ive written off Rotherham outside that mini league so 3rd botton would leave us 21st. Not that such a season would warrant any praise. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Another drab watch, in isolation a decent point but yet another failure to win for Eustace. We have a good chance of survival purely because of the number of teams down there, in a mini league of 8 you just have to avoid being in the bottom 2 and we already have a buffer even though its been cut since Eustace came in. But it shouldn't be heralded as an achievement. The team looked far more balanced with a back 4 and I just hope that Eustace doesnt revert back and put in McFadzean who we looked much better without. Scott Wharton would probably go down as our man of the match and did very well. Hyam wasn't quite as solid but still the pair did very well all the same. Brittain was also good and slightly better than Pickering who uncharacteristically gave the ball away once or twice. But overall the back 4 did well. Tronstad was a huge bonus and is our only convincing midfielder, Buckley was tenacious but is not good enough on the ball and conceded possession too often. The attacking players dont play as if they are well coached as to what to do, that was an area that Tomasson clearly coached them well at. Under Eustace it is a regular occurence to see players playing on different wavelengths and passes not made at the right time. Gallagher was far more effective as an out and out striker even allowing for his usual clumsiness. Some of his link play got Szmodics in particular in a few times although he was well off his usual levels. Hedges tired badly and his end product can flatter to deceive but we are better with him playing. Sigurdsson again was pointless. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I think you are clutching at straws perhaps due to a dislike of Tomasson. I dont doubt that Eustace came into far from ideal circumstances. I also think that Tomasson's time came to an end. But we have seen zero new manager bounce and displayed relegation form in a run of games which has been favourable. It wouldnt be a remarkablr achievement to keep us up considering where we were when he came in. -
Broughton's transfer record is poor but the 500k release fee had to be negotiated across the month because we couldnt afford it and no doubt his wages are dirt cheap. Even Suhail who is just a worm of a middle man for the owners and Waggott aren't THE issue.
-
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
We was 7 points (I think) clear and about 8 teams clear when he came in. Hardly some turnaround. -
v Middlesbrough (a) - 16/3/24
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
An average of less than a point a game and 0 wins with none of the games being against the top 6 is not good foundations for anything. -
Sam Szmodics-Your thoughts?
roversfan99 replied to BRFC4EVA's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Not good news for us. Even if he avoids injury, he needs a rest. -
Hard to judge on his time here, struggled for his first few cameos then put in a brilliant performance v Sheffield United and one or two other good cameos before injury. Has been very good for Sheffield Wednesday now hes getting a run of games. But wil probably want above minimum wage.
-
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
roversfan99 replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Until?
