roversfan99
Members-
Posts
25378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
107
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Uncouth Garb - The BRFCS Store
Everything posted by roversfan99
-
Ultimately we are all somewhat speculating and estimating no matter how much some profess otherwise but that would mean that we would have been over 10/15m over FFP regulations prior to the Armstrong sale. I don't doubt that Mowbray's spending has been far from 100% efficient. Gallagher is the stand out mistake, not very good, big fee and big wages. Often criticised a lack of ruthlessness upon promotion when he dished out new deals too. I don't doubt that he played a big part in coming into the summer with a poor squad, and based on last season he shouldn't be here, but he has been very restricted by an uncompetitive budget this season, and it is not Mowbray's fault that he got such a restrictive budget, he isn't in charge of the purse strings, and being so restrictive will actually impede us financially when assets leave for free, so it is short sighted by Venkys. The lines have been about how tough it has been in India and putting the breaks on the journey, the FFP reason in the main has come solely from supporters, surely if we was so far over regulations, Waggott in particular and even Mowbray would have regularly brought it out as an excuse throughout the summer, but they didn't. He does want as a big a squad as he can but even by loaning 4 in, the squad is still very thin and massively depleted in numbers compared to last season and we are struggling to name a squad with just a few injuries.
-
Mowbray has repeatedly said that he would like the current players to be given extended deals and regularly mentions the idea of selling players at a profit and then reinvesting part of that windfall, which should be the policy. He has also (as well as Waggott) mentioned the strict wage ceiling which has been enforced above his head that is preventing those players from signing on. He has just made 8 figures worth of profit on one of his signings, if the owners allowed just a little flexibility in slightly moving that ceiling up, they could then sell on some of those assets down the line and financially benefit. Sadly, they don't have a plan. When those players contracts were renewed, it was a very strange decision and compounded by the decision by Waggott and presumably those above to refuse refunds on season ticket holders, it felt like a slap in the face. But for an extra month, it would have been small fry overall if you compare it to the potential budget to sign players, and that strict ceiling would still remain. I don't get how is to blame for the uncompetitive budget of this season. I take on board and share the criticism aimed his way at the state of the squad going into the summer, 100%. But why is he to blame for the uncompetitive budget this time? FFP regulations? Something that regularly crops up but Mowbray/Waggott never once really mentioned it in regards to the low budget. A lack of trust? In which case, why is Mowbray still manager?
-
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Could argue that he is keeping his feet on the ground. He has been publically very supportive of Brereton for years. -
I am unsure how you have concluded from my post that I am constantly making excuses from him when you agree with the point I am making, that the only reason that people even notice his touchline demeanour is because of results, especially in the second half of last season. In regards to the other stuff, Mowbray is not the one who sets the budgets, so that is nonsensical. What he is to blame for somewhat is the state of the squad going into the summer, that I would strongly agree with. The budget this summer was not a competitive one, unable to even sign experienced loanees despite selling one of his own signings for a profit, mind you, he shouldn't have been manager going into the summer. But me constantly making excuses for him doesn't fit in with the fact that I have consistently said for months that I want him to be sacked and that he would have been if the owners had any interest in us. His touchline demeanour is an example of a stick used to beat him unnecessarily, the results and 15th place finish last season is a strong enough argument.
-
The squad does not have the quality to be in the top 6. Last season prior to selling Armstrong and being so hamstrung in the market, he should have been far, far closer. There will not be just one reason or specific failing as to why that didnt happen, and indeed suggesting it is all solely down to Mowbray "being tactically awful" is a massively presumptious oversimplification. I dont think anyone is comparing Mowbray to any of those. Point being that there is minimal correlation between animation on the touchline and quality of manager. Scott Parker, top of the league, very placid on the touchline. Mark Robins, doing brilliantly, not the most animated. Daniel Farke, 2 recent league titles, again not a shouter. You get the picture.
-
"Falling asleep" again is obviously blatantly not true. Your illustrious sporting career aside, I don't get the fascination with how he behaves on the touchline. There are many better managers that are equally if not even less animated than him as I gave an example of in Allardyce. Alternatively, some of the most incompetent managers in the game kick every ball on the touchline like Coyle did. I dont really think that it makes any difference, you could argue that a manager constantly running around like a mad man would only pass over signals of panic and chaos if it did. If the results were good, as they were for example in League 1, no one gave a shit about his touchline demeanour. Ultimately, when results became poor last season, his unchanged touchline demeanour then became a further stick to poke him with when inadequate results is more than enough on its own to justify an opinion of wanting a change.
-
I have always found the regular conversation about Mowbray's touchline demeanour to be a little strange, I do get the frustration about him in general and he shouldn't be here any more but ultimately, better managers than Mowbray are more reserved and worse managers are more animated. Coyle used to jump around wearing full kit and he was as bad a manager as you could wish to see, whereas Allardyce used to spend the first half sat in the stands and he was a very capable manager. Mowbray was the same in League 1 when we won almost every week, that is just his personality. I don't think that his failures are down to a lack of ability to inspire, nor do I think that players are motivated by a manager jumping around like a maniac on the touchline.
-
What noise aside from nonsense about Alex Neil's imminent appointment?
-
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
A yearly 20m loss isnt obligatory as part of being a Championship club. -
If he has had to go, then its totally crazy.
-
Surely they will come over to Ewood now that they said in a letter that they still care? Maybe not.
-
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Yes. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Brereton will miss the Coventry game, but I think that Brereton suits being left of a 3 ideally, he showed in a couple of games lately in which he played centrally that it doesn't suit him to play central. Burns would be a total wildcard selection. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Still not many goals there, and absolutely no evidence based on Mowbray's selection history that he would start Butterworth over Poveda or involve Burns. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/football-news/blackburn-rovers-injuries-break-blackpool-21746960 Gallagher is having a scan on a hamstring injury. Not that he in isolation is a huge miss, but a potential front 3 of Khadra, Dolan and Poveda certainly won't put any fear into Coventry in a couple of weeks. Really lacking in forward areas. -
Clearly not enough as its not signed.
-
How could you possibly know that?
-
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Absolute shite with an underfunded squad lacking in quality and depth showing further signs of being lacking. As soon as Magloire was named in the starting 11, we had as good as forfeited before the game had begun. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
You do wonder if giving him an extended deal was premature. Doesn't seem close to being up to the rigours of regular football. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Sounds like a mismatch for Saturday. Johnson is going to be involved, Van Hecke "not ready" although has been in full training for 2 or 3 days, Rankin Costello not mentioned but shown on the video, Lenihan a big doubt, Nyambe definitely out, Rothwell and Gallagher big doubts should be ok. I personally think we need to weigh it up and potentially take a small risk. If we go with Magloire, it will be a mix of a player not up to it and also some sort of mismatch, either Buckley at wing back or Magloire himself out of position. I think we need to weigh it up and decide who is fittest from Lenihan, (perhaps with a pain killing injection) Van Hecke or Rankin Costello. Not ideal but even if it backfired, we have loads more bodies back in 2 weeks, Lenihan, Van Hecke, Nyambe, Rankin Costello and Wharton. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Magloire at centre back wouldnt be too far off accepting defeat before kick off. Johnson is back available according to Mowbray. I think Johnson in for Nyambe with Travis moving to right back should be under serious consideration, not ideal but needs must. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Do people think there is a chance of postponement, looking at the forecast especially on the day and the history of postponements at Bloomfield Road? -
v Huddersfield (a) - 28/09/2021
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
With Edun, he certainly has regularly trained and played as a full back. Obviously, it is not ideal him playing on his wrong side, but he is a natural full back, it is better than playing a centre back so far off the required standard there instead. It would be between Edun and Travis, and I would prefer the latter in midfield. On Maja, we seemingly now have had it confirmed by Waggott that he was the player. Whether the loan would have been no strings attached, with a non committal option in it or an obligation will forever remain unknown, and ultimately is irrelevant to my point that the idea that we will have signings all lined up in an organised manner on a suddenly created budget seems fanciful to me. -
v Huddersfield (a) - 28/09/2021
roversfan99 replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Definitely another more viable alternative than what I expect (Magloire in a back 3, Buckley right wing back) but I fear that we would miss him too much in midfield. Who would your midfield 2 be? Edun, Davenport, Clarkson and if fit Johnson seem the choices. -
v Blackpool (a) - 2/10/21
roversfan99 replied to Mike E's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Assuming that Rothwell doesn't make it: Kaminski Edun Carter Ayala Pickering Travis Johnson Dolan Buckley Brereton Gallagher Subs: Pears, Davenport, Khadra, Butterworth, Clarkson, Phillips, Cirino
