In general, I dont think the narrative that the grass isnt greener for many really applies anymore. It usually is, even if that involves spells of Premier League football followed by loans to play regular top end Championship football. With Dolan though, I dont think he necessarily will go onto bigger and better things. I dont think he should feel an obligation of loyalty though.

We have been in the top 6 twice in 3 years and we spent about half a million in fees across those 2 seasons. Why would it give them no hiding place.

Abuse only heard from Malta.

Rosenior is close to getting the sack at Strasbourg. I think with the players at his disposal last season questions were understandably asked at not being top 6.

The latest minutes are out and people from the club seem so keen to push how low the concession prices are, as if thats similar to if they reduced adult prices. Adult prices are the key, especially as they will likely be the ones footing the bill for the concession, its no good having cheap under age tickets if the adult cant afford or justify the cost of going. No questions seemingly on the massive hikes during various phases. Also, the pitch revamp would have cost £2.5m when it was priced up. The drainage system is from 1989, and the fact that our kind owners who "never fail to sign a cheque" refused to make the FFP exempt payment clearly is an issue.

Ring the ticket office and they will refund you.

Have you been under a rock for 14 years?

Vinjay will be an adopted scouser next year at this rate.

Its an irrelevance to him as a football manager. He definitely could still play expansive football in spite of not having the players, Tomasson did last year, and loads of managers do. At Birmingham one common comment from their fans was that he played more pragmatic football there too. More than ever these days, people demand expansive football and anything else is deemed to be not moving with the times. Hence why you have League 2 sides trying to play out from the back. Lately we still havent been playing expansively, but tend to create a small number of big chances a game through very cleverly crafted moves. They feel like ones worked on the training ground, Brittain did 2 crosses yesterday on the volley from crossfield passes, one he ballooned over everyone but the other led to Ohashi's chance. 2 areas which could give us more strings to our bow is to improve on set pieces as I still feel we defend them well enough but dont offer nearly enough threat from attacking them. And also we desperately need pace because when we sit back it would allow us to counter attack much better. Maybe ACD can help that but he needs new players to do it. Eustace said 4 areas to recruitment that he felt that the squad needed, one was pace but he didnt get it.

Gestede was supposed to have "knowledge of the French and Belgian markets" so I expect that Gueye was his recommendation.

When Travis or Tronstad have gone off, rare I know, Buckley came on. Baker has only really been used out of position. Assuming we go same again beside replacing Travis, ACD would be the first sub on. Whether chasing the game or winning and looking to counter. Not Hedges. Leonard just wasnt ready when he played last season. Often struggled to get involved, didnt score too many (missing quite a lot) and doesnt really contribute in other ways, ie holding it up, having pace to run in behind etc. He is young and raw and ideally would be out on loan. But he isnt totally useless like Gueye.

Why Everton?

I would also put Baker in for Travis but I wouldnt be surprised if Eustace opts for Buckley. Hopefully Cantwell will be fit to play. I would like to see ACD at some point to give us some pace and also assuming Ohashi doesnt last the 90 minutes, even though I dont think hes Championship ready, use Leonard, not Gueye.

I doubt we will have any money in January so it will be difficult to strengthen. Eustace wants a striker, he said as such recently. Gestede signed a donkey last time he tried to address that, but would we be willing and able to try and move Gueye on, would our main summer signing just become 3rd choice if not, and would Gestede be able to sign anyone with any use with potentially less money than he signed Gueye with?

I dont care who apologised. Pears shouldnt have passed it to him when he could see the full picture. Thankfully, he redeemed himself with the save so no harm done.

If you are reading them as criticism when I have repeatedly said that its a compliment to the manager then that is on you. Eustace is a pragmatic, defensively focused manager and is managing a side that has some solid players in it but one that due to budget cuts is lacking in goalscorers and lacking in pace. Therefore his approach suits the players we have and that is shown by the results. I wasnt specifically on about yesterday (I enjoyed both the game and mainly the result) and I dont understand how my comments are being seen as negative. Im not saying, its boring and we need to change. His pragmatic approach is the best approach with the players at his disposal.

Is this regarding yesterday or Norwich? Pears would have seen everything in front of him and shouldnt play either pass. Thankfully though neither led to a goal so it isnt overly important as long as he doesnt keep doing it.

Your problem is that you are so on guard to defend Eustace that you often misinterpet what people are saying as if its a criticism. I think another poster (maybe arbitro but apologies if not) said something similar the other day. Ive always said that its all about results, I am satisfied after a scrappy win and never satisfied by a high scoring open loss. As you said, I criticised Tomasson for continuing with his "principles" last season, something you couldnt possibly question at the time as he was the current manager. You look around and teams often play in a way not suiting their squad, I saw the highlights of Wolves giving away 3 stupid penalties yesterday after Gary O'Neil was persisting with playing out from the back. Ridiculous. I dont think our attacking players are particularly good, Cantwell is obviously a talent but otherwise we lack goals, we lack pace and we lack real quality there. Symptomatic of the owners lack of investment of course. My point is that I think a manager like Eustace, he comes across as quite dull and his teams dont play "exciting" football, but his strengths lie in organisation and his teams play more pragmatic and defensive football. That is the type of manager that suits our current situation because we dont have the players to play expansive and open football, and that was my point. The fact that Eustace doesn't have stubbornness towards the sort of style that most teams try to play regardless of whether they are capable of it is a positive, and its leading to good results. Im not sure why you have taken out that comment about not playing "thrill a minute" football and spun it as if I am demanding us to start playing like that. Also on Pears. Obviously we would prefer someone like Kaminski was for us, he was better than Pears and saved us points. But for Pears to go from absolute liability to someone who only once or twice has us goals this season with mistakes is a notable improvement which I am crediting him for. He no longer is a glaring weakness in our team.

The one at Norwich was Pears' fault. As the keeper, he can see everything so it was stupid to make the pass and fortunately I think it was Tronstad again who bailed him out. But he isnt making anything other than occasional goal costing mistakes this season with a few scares around that. He is having a good season off the back of a woeful one. He deserves credit for the imrpovement and has got it. Like I said yesterday goalkeeper has gone from being the main thing people wanted in the summer to not something mentioned ahead of January.

The player wouldnt be eligible for his parent club until the next transfer window.

Perception of Raya IMO has been skewed by how good he has become in the many years since. He was very raw and young here and made plenty of mistakes in the season we came up to the Championship prior to his departure. It was obviously short sighted to let him go but even when he initially joined Brentford in that first season he was still making mistakes, notably one at Hull and also one in the play off final that cost them promotion. A mixture of experience, expert coaching and exposure to playing at the highest level has of course turned him into a totally different proposition. Had he stayed here he wouldnt be the same keeper. Kaminski was excellent in the most part here. He won player of the season once and in his final season, he kept us in so many games (the Birmingham one at home stands out) but got an unfortunate injury which in the final couple of games prior to an extended spell on the sidelines, he made a couple of mistakes when he was carrying that injury. He then was never reinstated and moved on. To suggest that the Sheffield Wednesday mistake was an isolated mistake by Pears would be absolute rubbish. Last season he made so many, he chucked one into his own net against Ipswich in the home game prior, he also made 2 mistakes at Plymouth, one at home to Hull, one away at Preston, one away at Swansea and one or two away at Ipswich that led to goals. Maybe more. He was an absolute liability last season, regularly costing us goals. This season he made one at Coventry but otherwise the mistakes leading to goals (he has still had shaky moments, today v Leeds and a worse one at Norwich stand out) have been cut from his game and he deserves credit for that. He had a very much warranted reputation as a calamity who regularly cost us goals. Thankfully he has stopped doing that and the narrative is changing. When people mentioned in the past where we needed to strengthen, everyone said in net. Now they say other positions so he is gaining trust.

The point was that he is currently making the saves youd expect him to make, without being like Kaminski and making outstanding saves he has no right to save. And crediting him from going from a keeper who was making mistake after mistake last season (many of which cant just be fobbed off as down to us being open and less not as hard to play against, some where under Eustace) to one who is no longer making repeated unforced errors. Thats praise as its a considerable improvement and doesnt have any negative connotations.

It wasnt even just Mowbray. Venkys have never shown much interest in making a move in January.

The acid test might be whether we can sustain these levels across the season as that tends to be the issue. Eustace like Tomasson and Mowbray before has started the season well but its whether an underfunded squad can maintain it across 46 games. He is definitely the type of manager that is the right one for the situation we are in. He comes across as fairly mundane and his teams certainly dont play exciting thrill a minute football but the way he has the team organised and structured is really proving to be effective despite a lack of firepower. It feels like he is dripping them for everything they have got. There were question marks last season because he didnt win barely at all especially at home, but we are able to now. I dont think that Pears is anywhere Kaminski levels, Kaminski used to save us points and save things you wouldnt necessarily expect him too. Pears doesnt, take today (ignoring his wayward kicking and first half mistake) the saves he made were routine, same with the catches, youd expect him to make them. That has pretty much been the case all season, aided by being afforded far better protection. The difference comes in the goals he has conceded, last season there were so many that he let in that he simply shouldnt have done. This season, there have been maybe 1 or 2 that I can remember, very occasional mistakes. This may sound critical or at best a back handed compliment, but to go from regularly chucking in goals he should routinely save to now saving shots he should and letting in ones that he wouldnt be expected to save is an improvement I wasnt expecting, so fair play to him.

Have you given up on Gueye? (He is shite to be fair)